An analysis of the effects of structural parameter variations on the auditory perception of environmental noises transmitted through a simulated window

Applied Acoustics

Volumn 69, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 1212-1223

  Trolle A ^a,b   Marquis Favre, C ^a,b   Faure, J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Auditory perception; Environmental noises; Merit values; Perceived distances; Quality of sounds; Window

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; WINDOWS;

ACOUSTIC COMFORT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BOUNDARY CONDITIONING; ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE; ENVIRONMENTAL NOISES; MERIT VALUES; PERCEIVED DISTANCES; PREFERENCE RANKING; QUALITY OF SOUNDS; STRUCTURAL DAMPING; STRUCTURAL MODIFICATIONS; STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS; WINDOW;

PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS);

EID: 52049092540     PISSN: 0003682X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Genuit K. Background and practical examples of sound design. Acta Acust Unit Acoust 83 5 (1997) 805-812
2. Widmann U. Three application examples for sound quality design using psychoacoustic tools. Acta Acust Unit Acoust 83 5 (1997) 819-826
3. Bodden M, Heinrichs R, Linow A. Sound quality evaluation of interior vehicle noise using an efficient psychoacoustic method. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Noise Control - Euronoise'98, Munich, Germany: 1998.
4. Bardot A, Roussarie V, Tsogo L, Masson M-H. Pertinence of sensory evaluation of vehicle sounds: analysis of a multidimensional scaling representation with the classical sensory profiling analysis. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering - Inter-noise 2002, Dearborn, USA: 2002.
5. Roussarie V. Analyse perceptive de structures vibrantes simulées par modèle physique. PhD Thesis, Université du Maine; 1999.
6. Meunier S., Habault D., and Canévet G. Auditory evaluation of sound signals radiated by a vibrating surface. J Sound Vibrat 247 5 (2001) 897-915
7. Hamzaoui N, Sandier C, Parizet E, Wetta P, Besseyrias C. Subjective assessments of the acoustic radiation from steel structures: some effects of a few parametric variations. In: Proceedings of Forum Acusticum 2002, Sevilla, Spain: 2002.
8. Canévet G., Habault D., Meunier S., and Demirdjian F. Auditory perception of sounds radiated by a fluid-loaded vibrating plate excited by a transient point force. Acta Acust Unit Acust 90 1 (2004) 181-193
9. Faure J., and Marquis-Favre C. Perceptual assessment of the influence of structural parameters for a radiating plate. Acta Acust Unit Acust 91 1 (2005) 77-90
10. Faure J. Influence des paramètres structuraux d'une plaque rayonnante sur la perception sonore. PhD thesis, Institut National des Sciences Appliquéees de Lyon: 2003.
11. Faure J, Marquis-Favre C, Sgard F. Perceptual attributes of sounds transmitted through a window: effects of the glass viscoelastic boundary conditions. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Noise Control - Euronoise 2003, Naples, Italy: 2003.
12. Faure J, Marquis-Favre C. Perception of sounds radiated from a vibrating plate: comparison of structural parameters influences. In: Proceedings of CFA/DAGA'04, Strasbourg, France; 2004.
13. Berry A. A new formulation for the vibrations and sound radiation of fluid-loaded plates with elastic boundary conditions. J Acoust Soc Amer 96 2 (1994) 889-901
14. Chiello O., Sgard F., and Attala N. On the use of a component mode synthesis technique to investigate the effects of elastic boundary conditions on the transmission loss of baffled plates. Comput Struct 81 (2003) 2645-2658
15. EN ISO 717-1: Acoustique. Evaluation de l'isolement acoustique des immeubles et des éléments de construction - partie 1: Isolement aux bruits aériens, 1996.
16. Lesueur C. Rayonnement acoustique des structures: Vibroacoustique, interactions fluide-structure (1988), Editions Eyrolles, Paris
17. Cottet F. Traitement des signaux et acquisition de données (2002), Dunod, Paris
18. Edwards A.L. The scaling of stimuli by the method of successive intervals. J Appl Psychol 36 (1952) 118-122
19. Carroll J.D., and Chang J.J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition. Psychometrika 35 (1970) 283-319
20. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1 (1966) 245-276
21. Sound Quality V.3.7 Manual. MTS Systems Corporation; 2002.
22. Thurstone L.L. A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 34 (1927) 273-286
23. Kendall M.G., and Smith B. On the method of paired comparison. Biometrika 31 (1940) 324-345
24. David H.A. The method of paired comparisons (1988), Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. Palm R. Utilisation du bootstrap pour les problèmes statistiques liés à l'estimation des paramètres. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ 6 3 (2002) 143-153
26. Zwicker E., and Fastl H. Psychoacoustics, facts and models (1999), Springer, Berlin
27. Aures W. Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen wohlklang beliebiger schallsignale. Acustica 59 (1985) 130-141