An anchor-dependent molecular docking process for docking small flexible molecules into rigid protein receptors

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 48, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1638-1655

  Lin, Thy Hou ^a   Lin, Guan Liang ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; COMPLEXATION; MOLECULAR MODELING; MOLECULES; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; PROTEINS;

ENERGY MINIMIZATION; EXTENDED VERSIONS; FLEXIBLE MOLECULES; INACTIVE COMPOUNDS; PROTEIN RECEPTORS; RECEPTOR-LIGAND COMPLEX; STERIC INTERACTIONS; TRANSLATIONAL MOTIONS;

LIGANDS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; KINETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING;

ALGORITHMS; KINETICS; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 52049092075     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci800124g     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32, 335-373.
2. Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. New methodologies for ligand-based virtual screening. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 1189-1202.
3. Levinthal, C.; Wodak, S. J.; Kahn, P.; Dadivanian, A. K. Hemoglobin interaction in sickle cell fibers. I. Theoretical approaches to the molecular contacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1975, 72, 1330-1334.
4. Salenme, F. R. A hypothetical structure for an intermolecular electron transfer complex of cytochromes C and b5. J. Mol. Biol. 1976, 102, 563-568.
5. Koshland, D. E., Jr. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1958, 44, 98-104.
6. DesJarlais, R. L.; Sheridan, R. P.; Dixon, J. S.; Kuntz, I. D.; Venkataraghavan, R. Docking flexible ligands to macromolecular receptors by molecular shape. J. Med. Chem. 1986, 29, 2149-2153.
7. Gabb, J.; Jackson, R. M.; Sternberg, M. J. E. Modeling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 272, 106-120.
8. Jiang, F.; Gao, Y.; Mao, F.; Liu, Z.; Lai, L. Potential of mean force for protein-protein interaction studies. Proteins 2002, 46, 190-196.
9. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecular-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288.
10. Norel, R.; Lin, S. L.; Wolfson, H. J.; Nussinov, R. Shape complementarity at protein-protein interfaces. Biopolymers 1994, 34, 933-940.
11. Busetta, B.; Tickle, I. J.; Blundel, T. L. DOCKER, an interactive program for simulating protein receptor and substrate interactions. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1983, 16, 432-437.
12. Goodford, P. J. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849-857.
13. Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 505-524.
14. Goodsell, D. S.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of structures to proteins by simulated annealing. Proteins 1990, 8, 195-202.
15. Liu, M.; Wang, S. MCDOCK: a Monte Carlo simulation approach to the molecular docking problem. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 435-451.
16. Trosset, J. Y.; Scheraga, H. A. Prodock: software package for protein modeling and docking. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 412-427.
17. Murray, C. W.; Baxter, C. A.; Frankel, A. D. The sensitivity of the results of molecular docking to induced effects: application to thrombin, thermolysin and neuraminidase. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1999, 13, 547-562.
18. Jones, G.; Willet, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
19. Yang, J. M.; Chen, C. C. GEMDOCK: A genetic evolutionary method for molecular docking. Proteins 2004, 55, 288-304.
20. Thomsen, R.; Christensen, M. H. MolDock: A new technique for high-accuracy molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3315-3321.
21. Grosdidier, A.; Zoete, V.; Michielin, O. EADock: Docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization. Proteins 2007, 67, 1010-1025.
22. Knegtel, R. M. A.; Kuntz, I. D.; Oshiro, C. M. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 266, 424-440.
23. DesJarlais, R. L.; Scheridan, R. P.; Seibel, G. L.; Dixon, J. S.; Kuntz, I. D.; Venkataraghavan, R. Using shape complementarity as an initial screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 722-729.
24. Ewing, T. J. A.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-428.
25. Brooijmans, N. Theoretical studies of molecular recognition. Ph.D. thesis, University of California San Franciscojanuary 24, 2003, 250 pp.
26. Kearsley, S. K.; Underwood, D. J.; Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D. Flexibases: A way to enhance the use of molecular docking methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 565-582.
27. Miller, M. D.; Kearsley, S. K.; Underwood, D. J.; Sheridan, R. P. FLOG: A system to select quasi-flexible ligands complementary to receptor of known three-dimensional structures. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 153-174.
28. Boehm, H. J. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: A fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 309-323.
29. Brown, R. D.; Martin, Y. C. Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 572-584.
30. Budin, N.; Majeux, N.; Caflisch, A. Fragment-based flexible ligand docking by evolutionary optimization. Biol. Chem. 2001, 382, 1365-1372.
31. Pazos, F.; Sternberg, M. J. Automated prediction of protein function and detection of functional sites from structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 14754-14759.
32. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Verkhivker, G.; Rejto, P. A.; Foget, D. B.; Fogel, L. J.; Freer, S. T. Docking conformationally flexible small molecules into a protein binding site through evolutionary programming. In Evolutionary Programming IV, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Evolutionary Programming, San Diego, CA, March 1-3, 1995; McDonnell, J. R., Reynalds, R. G., Fogel, D. B., Eds.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1995, pp615-627.
33. Berman, H. M.; Henrick, K.; Nakamura, H. Announcing the worldwide Protein Data Bank. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003, 10, 980.
34. Goto, J.; Kataoka, R.; Hirayama, N. Ph4Dock: Pharmacophore-based protein-ligand docking. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 6804-6811.
35. SYBYL 7.3. The Tripos Associates, 1699 Hanley Rd., St. Louis, MO, 2006.
36. Lin, T. H.; Yu, Y. S.; Chen, H. J. Classification of some active compounds and their inactive analogues using two three-dimensional molecular descriptors derived from computation of three-dimensional convex hulls for structures theoretically generated for them. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1210-1221.
37. Randic, M.; Wilkins, C. L. Graph theoretical approach to recognition of structural similarity in molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1979, 19, 31-37.
38. Moock, T. E.; Henry, D. R.; Ozkabak, A. G.; Alamgir, M. Conformational searching in ISIS/3D Databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 184-189.
39. Singh, A. P.; Latombe, J. C.; Brutlag, D. L. A motion planning approach to flexible ligand binding. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 1999, 7, 252-261.
40. Hartenburg, R. S.; Denavit, J. A. Kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices. J. Appl. Mechanics 1955, 77, 215-221.
41. Shoemake,K. Uniform random rotations. In Graphics Gems III, 1st ed.; Kirk, D., Ed.; AP Professional: Boston, MA, 1992; pp 124-132.
42. Trosset, J. Y.; Scheraga, H. A. PRODOCK: Software package for protein modeling and docking. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 412-427.
43. Hestenes, D. Proper dynamics of a rigid point particle. J. Math. Phys. 1974, 15, 1778-1791.
44. Juffer, A. H.; Shepherd, C. M.; Vogel, H. J. Protein-membrane electrostatic interactions: application of the lekner summation technique. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 1892-1905.
45. Kabsch, W. A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr. 1978, A34, 827-828.
46. Lin, T. H.; Chiu, S. H.; Tsai, K. C. Supervised feature ranking using a genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 1604-1614.
47. Gehlhaar, D. K.; Bouzida, D.; Rejto, P. A. Fully automated and rapid flexible docking of inhibitors covalently bound to serine proteases. In Evolutionary Programming VII, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Evolutionary Programming.San Diego, CA, March 1-3, 1998; Eiben, A., Porto, V., Saravanan, N., Eds.; Springer-Verlag:New York, 1998; pp 449-461.
48. Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157-1174.
49. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T A. Glide: A new approach for rapid accurate docking and scoring. I. method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749.
50. Rarey, M.; Krame, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 267, 470-489.
51. Jain, A. N. Surflex: Fully automatic molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based searching engine. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 499-511.
52. Trosset, J. Y.; Scheraga, H. A. Reaching the global minimum in docking simulations: a Monte Carlo energy minimization approach using Bezier splines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 8011-8015.
53. Abagyan, R.; Totrov, R. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 983-1002.
54. Abagyan, R.; Totrov, R.; Kuznetsov, D. ICM-a new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comput. Chem. 1994, 15, 488-506.
55. Totrov, R.; Abagyan, R. Flexible protein-ligand docking by global energy minimization in internal coordinates. Proteins (Suppl.) 1997, 1, 215-220.
56. Pang, Y. P.; Perola, E.; Xu, K.; Prendergast, F. G. EUDOC: a computer program for identification of drug interaction sites in macromolecules and drug leads from chemical databases. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1750-1771.
57. Gruetter, M. G.; Rahuel, J.; Priestle, J. P. The crystal structure of recombinant glycosylated human rennin alone and in complex with a transition state analog inhibitor. J. Struct. Biol. 1991, 107, 227-236.
58. Garcia-Saez, I.; Parraga, A.; Phillips, M. F.; Mantle, T. J.; Coll, M. Molecular structure at 1.8 A of mouse liver class pi glutathione S-transferase complexed with S-(p-nitrobenzyl)glutathione and other inhibitors. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 237, 298-314.
59. Onodera, K.; Satou, K.; Hirota, H. Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1609-1618.
60. Pevarello, P.; Brasca, M. G.; Amici, R.; Orsini, P.; Traquandi, G.; Corti, L.; Piutti, C.; Sansonna, P.; Villa, M.; Pierce, B. S.; Pulici, M.; Giordano, P.; Martina, K.; Fritzen, E. L.; Nugent, A.; Casale, E.; Cameron, A.; Ciomei, M.; Rolette, F.; Isacchi, A.; Fogliatto, G.; Pesenti, E.; Pastori, W.; Marsiglio, A.; Leach, K.; Clare, P. M.; Fiorentini, F.; Varasi, M.; Vulpetti, A.; Warpehoski, M. A. 3-aminopyrazole inhibitors of CDK2/Cyclin A as antitumor agents I. lead finding. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3367-3380.
61. Pissamitski, D. A.; Asberom, T.; Boyle, C. D.; Chackalamannil, S.; Chintala, M.; Clader, J. W.; Greenlee, W. J.; Hu, Y.; Kurowski, S.; Myers, J.; Palamanda, J.; Stamford, A. W.; Vemulapalli, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, P.; Wu, P.; Xu, R. SAR development of polycyclic guanine derivatives targeted to the discovery of a selective PDE5 inhibitor for treatment of erectile dysfunction. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 14, 1291-1294.
62. Tong, Y.; Lin, N. H.; Wang, L.; Hasvold, L.; Wang, W.; Leonard, N.; Li, T.; Li, Q.; Cohen, J.; Gu, W. Z.; Zhang, H.; Soil, V.; Bauch, J.; Marsh, K.; Rosenberg, S. H.; Sham, H. L. Discovery of potent imidazole and cyanophenyl containing farnesyltransferase inhibitors with improved oral bioavailability. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2003, 13, 1571-1574.
63. Wei, H. Y.; Tsai, K. C.; Lin, T. H. Modeling ligand-receptor interaction for some MHC class II HLA-DR4 peptide mimetic inhibitors using several molecular docking and 3D QSAR techniques. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1343-1351.
64. Sato, H.; Shewchuk, L. M.; Tang, J. Prediction of multiple binding modes of the CDK2 inhibitors, anilinopyrazoles, using the automated docking programs GOLD, FlexX, and LigandFit: an evaluation of performance. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2552-2562.