Central projections of trigeminal afferents innervating the face in naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber)

Anatomical Record

Volumn 291, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 988-998

  Henry, Erin C ^a   Sarko, Diana K ^a   Catania, Kenneth C ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dental; Pain; Somatosensory; Teeth; Tooth pulp

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME P450;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BRAIN STEM; FACE MUSCLE; FACIAL NERVE; HISTOLOGY; INNERVATION; METABOLISM; MOLE RAT; NERVE FIBER TRANSPORT; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY NERVE; TOOTH PULP; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

AFFERENT PATHWAYS; ANIMALS; AXONAL TRANSPORT; BRAIN STEM; CYTOCHROME P-450 ENZYME SYSTEM; DENTAL PULP; FACIAL MUSCLES; FACIAL NERVE; MOLE RATS; TRIGEMINAL NERVE;

EID: 52049090404     PISSN: 19328486     EISSN: 19328494     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ar.20714     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arvidsson J. 1982. Somatotopic organization of vibrissae afferents in the trigeminal sensory nuclei of the rat studied by transganglionic transport of HRP. J Comp Neurol 211:84-92.
2. Bates RE Jr, Stewart CM. 1991. Atypical odontalgia: phantom tooth pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72:479-483.
3. Belford GR, Killackey HP. 1979. Vibrissae representation in subcortical trigeminal centers of the neonatal rat. J Comp Neurol 183:305-321.
4. Byers MR, Dong WK. 1989. Comparison of trigeminal receptor location and structure in the periodontal ligament of different types of teeth from the rat, cat, and monkey. J Comp Neurol 279:117-127.
5. Catania KC, Remple MS. 2002. Somatosensory cortex dominated by the representation of teeth in the naked mole-rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:5692-5697.
6. Clark GT. 2006. Persistent orodental pain, atypical odontalgia, and phantom tooth pain: when are they neuropathic disorders? J Calif Dent Assoc 34:599-609.
7. Cody FW, Harrison LM, Taylor A, Weghofer B. 1974. Distribution of tooth receptor afferents in the mesencephalic nucleus of the fifth cranial nerve. J Physiol 239:49-51.
8. Crish SD, Dengler-Crish CM, Catania KC. 2006. Central visual system of the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 288:205-212.
9. Darian-Smith I, Mayday G. 1960. Somatotopic organization within the brain-stem trigeminal complex of the cat. Exp Neurol 2:290-309.
10. Gibson AR, Hansma DI, Houk JC, Robinson FR. 1984. A sensitive low artifact TMB procedure for the demonstration of WGA-HRP in the CNS. Brain Res 298:235-241.
11. Gonzalo-Sanz LM, Insausti R. 1980. Fibers of trigeminal mesencephalic neurons in the maxillary nerve of the rat. Neurosci Lett 16:137-141.
12. Gordon G, Landgren S, Seed WA. 1961. The functional characteristics of single cells in the caudal part of the spinal nucleus of the trigeminal nerve of the cat. J Physiol Lond 158:544-559.
13. Grant G, Arvidsson J. 1975. Transganglionic degeneration in trigeminal primary sensory neurons. Brain Res 95:265-279.
14. Gregg JM, Dixon AD. 1973. Somatotopic organization of the trigeminal ganglion in the rat. Arch Oral Biol 18:487-498.
15. Heffner RS, Heffner HE. 1993. Degenerate hearing and sound localization in naked mole rats (Heterocephalus glaber), with an overview of central auditory structures. J Comp Neurol 331:418-433.
16. Henry EC, Marasco PD, Catania KC. 2005. Plasticity of the cortical dentition representation after tooth extraction in naked molerats. J Comp Neurol 485:64-74.
17. Henry EC, Remple MS, O'Riain MJ, Catania KC. 2006. Organization of somatosensory cortical areas in the naked mole-rat (Heterocephalus glaber). J Comp Neurol 495:434-452.
18. Jacquin MF, Chiaia NL, Rhoades RW. 1990. Trigeminal projections to contralateral dorsal horn: central extent, peripheral origins, and plasticity. Somatosens Mot Res 7:153-183.
19. Jain N, Florence SL, Qi HX, Kaas JH. 2000. Growth of new brainstem connections in adult monkeys with massive sensory loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5546-5550.
20. Leiser SC, Moxon KA. 2006. Relationship between physiological response type (RA and SA)and vibrissal receptive field of neurons within the rat trigeminal ganglion. J Neurophysiol 95:3129-3145.
21. Ma PM. 1991. The barrelettes - architectonic vibrissal representations in the brainstem trigeminal complex of the mouse. I. Normal structural organization. J Comp Neurol 309:161-199.
22. Marbach JJ. 1993a. Phantom tooth pain: differential diagnosis and treatment. N Y State Dent J 59:28-33.
23. Marbach JJ. 1993b. Is phantom tooth pain a deafferentation (neuropathic) syndrome? Part II. Psychosocial considerations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 75:225-232.
24. Marbach JJ. 1993c. Is phantom tooth pain a deafferentation (neuropathic) syndrome? Part I. Evidence derived from pathophysiology and treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 75:95-105.
25. Marbach JJ. 1996. Orofacial phantom pain:theory and phenomenology. J Am Dent Assoc 127:221-229.
26. Marbach JJ, Raphael KG. 2000. Phantom tooth pain: a new look at an old dilemma. Pain Med 1:68-77.
27. Marfurt CF, Turner DF. 1984. The central projections of tooth pulp afferent neurons in the rat as determined by the transganglionic transport of horseradish peroxidase. J Comp Neurol 223:535-547.
28. Nord SG. 1967. Somatotopic organization in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, the dorsal column nuclei and related structures in the rat. J Comp Neurol 130:343-356.
29. Pfaller K, Arvidsson J. 1988. Central distribution of trigeminal and upper cervical primary afferents in the rat studied by anterograde transport of horseradish peroxidase conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin. J Comp Neurol 268:91-108.
30. Remple MS, Henry EC, Catania KC. 2003. Organization of somatosensory cortex in the laboratory rat (Rattus norvegicus): evidence for two lateral areas joined at the representation of the teeth. J Comp Neurol 467:105-118.
31. Robertson B, Arvidsson J. 1985. Transganglionic transport of wheat germ agglutinin-HRP and choleragenoid-HRP in rat trigeminal primary sensory neurons. Brain Res 348:44-51.
32. Sengelaub DR, Muja N, Mills AC, Myers WA, Churchill JD, Garraghty PE. 1997. Denervation-induced sprouting of intact peripheral afferents into the cuneate nucleus of adult rats. Brain Res 769:256-262.
33. Shortland PJ, Jacquin MF, DeMaro JA, Kwan CL, Hu JW, Sessle BJ. 1995. Central projections of identified trigeminal primary afferents after molar pulp deafferentation in adult rats. Somatosens Mot Res 12:277-297.
34. Tassinari G, Migliorini A, Girardini F, Luzzani A. 2002. Reference fields in phantom tooth pain as a marker for remapping in the facial territory. Funct Neurol 17:121-127.
35. Waite PM, de Permentier P. 1991. The rat's postero-orbital sinus hair: I. Brainstem projections and the effect of infraorbital nerve section at different ages. J Comp Neurol 312:325-340.
36. Woolsey TA, Van der Loos H. 1970. The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. Brain Res 17:205-242.
37. Wong-Riley MIT. 1978. Changes in the visual system of monocularly sutured or enucleated cats demonstrable with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Brain Res 171:11-28.
38. Yokota T, Nishikawa N. 1977. Somatotopic organization of trigeminal neurons within caudal medulla oblongata. In: Anderson DJ, Matthews BM, editors. Pain in the trigeminal region. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press. p 243-257.
39. Yokota T, Nishikawa N. 1980. Reappraisal of somatotopic tactile representation within trigeminal subnucleus caudalis. J Neurophysiol 43:700-712.
40. Zhang JD, Wang L, Wang BR, Li JS. 1992. Mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus neurons with collaterals to both the masseter and the inferior alveolar nerves. A. florescent double-labeling study in the rat. Neurosci Lett 139:224-226.