A quantitative, traceable-to-NIST, reference aerosol generator for evaluating aerosol speciation monitors and measurement methods

Air and Waste Management Association - Symposium on Air Quality Measurement: Methods and Technology 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 300-304

  Cooper, John A ^a   Barth, Douglas C ^a   Nakanishi, Michael P ^a   Petterson, Krag A ^a   Yanca, Catherine A ^a  

^a Cooper Environmental Services ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Accurate; Aerosol; Aerosol generator; Evaluation; Linear; MACT; Metals measurement; Method 29; Method 301; Method validation; Multi metal; NESHAP; Precise; Quantitative; Reference; Stationary sources; Traceable to NIST

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE; AEROSOL; AEROSOL GENERATOR; AEROSOL GENERATORS; AIR AND WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION; AMBIENT ENVIRONMENTS; ANALYTES; EVALUATION; LINEAR; MACT; MEASUREMENT METHODS; METALS MEASUREMENT; METHOD 29; METHOD VALIDATION; MULTI-METAL; NESHAP; PRECISE; QUALITY MEASUREMENTS; QUANTITATIVE; REFERENCE; STACK GASES; STATIONARY SOURCES; TRACEABLE TO NIST;

AEROSOLS; AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; ATMOSPHERICS; FLUE GASES; METALS; PERMANENT MAGNETS; POWDER METALLURGY; TECHNOLOGY;

WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 52049090388     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories; Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 63; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2005.
2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 29, Determination of Metals Emissions from Stationary Sources; Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 60; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2005.
3. Rigo, H.G.; Chandler A.J.: Quantitation Limits for Reference Methods 23, 26, and 29; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 399-411.
4. American Society of Mechanical Engineers [ASME], Research Committee on Industrial and Municipal Waste; Reference Method Accuracy and Precision (ReMAP): Phase 1, Precision of Manual Stack Emission Measurements; Report No. CRTD-60; ASME International: Washington, DC, 2001.
5. Zhang, H.; Yueh, F.Y.; Singh, J.P. Evaluation of the Potential of Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Detection of Trace Element in Liquid; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 51, 681-687.
6. Seltzer, M.D. Performance Testing of a Multimetals Continuous Emissions Monitor; J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 2000, 50, 6.
7. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 301, Field Validation of Pollution Measurement Methods for Various Media; Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR 56; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 2005.
8. Fuchs, N. A.; Sutugin, A.G. Generation and Use of a Monodisperse Aerosol. In Aerosol Science; Davies, C.N.; Ed.; Academic Press Inc.: New York, NY, 1966; 1-30.
9. Corn, M.; Esmen, N. A. Aerosol Generation. In Handbook on Aerosols; Dennis, R.; Ed.; ERDA Technical Information Center: Oakridge, TN, 1976, 1-39.
10. Rau, J. L. Design Principles of Liquid Nebulization Devices Currently in Use. Respir. Care. 2002, 47(11), 1257-1275.
11. May, K.R. The Collison Nebulizer. Description, Performance & Application; J. Aerosol Science, 1973, 4(3), 235-243.
12. Berger, H. L. Ultrasonic LiquidAtomization: Theory and Application. Partridge Hill Publishers: Partridge Hill, New York, 1998.
13. Method 301 Evaluation of Three Methods for Multi-Metals Measurement and Validation; Cooper Environmental Services: Portland, OR, 2006.