Mixed incontinence is more bothersome than pure incontinence subtypes

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1359-1362

  Dooley, Yashika ^a,b   Lowenstein, Lior ^a   Kenton, Kimberly ^a   FitzGerald, Mary Pat ^a   Brubaker, Linda ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Bother; Mixed incontinence; Quality of life; Stress incontinence; Urge incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIXED INCONTINENCE; PATIENT CODING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; STRESS INCONTINENCE; URGE INCONTINENCE;

EID: 51949116693     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-008-0637-4     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167-178
2. Bump RC, Norton PA, Zinner NR, Yalcin I (2003) Duloxetine Urinary Incontinence Study G: Mixed uriUary incontinence symptoms: urodynamic findings, incontinence severity, and treatment response. Obstet Gynecol 102:76-83
3. Cardozo LD, Stanton SL (1980) Genuine stress incontinence and detrusor instability-a review of 200 patients. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 87(3):184-190
4. Sandvik H, Hunskaar S, Vanvik A, Bratt H, Seim A, Hermstad R (1995) Diagnostic classification of female urinary incontinence: An epidemiological survey corrected for validity. J Clin Epidemiol 48:339-343
5. Weidner AC, Myers ER, Visco AG, Cundiff GW, Bump RC (2001) Which women with stress incontinence require urodynamic evaluation? Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:20-27
6. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S (2000) A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: The Norwegian EPINCONT study. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1150-1157
7. Herzog AR, Diokno AC, Brown MB, Normolle DP, Brock BM (1990) Two-year incidence, remission, and change patterns of urinary incontinence in noninstitutionalized older adults. J Geron 45:M67-M74
8. Barber M, Walters M, Bump R (2005) Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:103-113
9. Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL, Monga A (2001) Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12:395-400
10. Stach-Lempinen B, Kirkinen P, Laippala P, Metsanoja R, Kujansuu E (2004) Do objective urodynamic or clinical findings determine impact of urinary incontinence or its treatment on quality of life? Urology 63:67-71
11. Iker S, Onaran M, Aksakal N, Acar C, Tan MO, Acar A, Bozkirli I (2006) The impact of urinary incontinence on female sexual function. Adv Ther 23(6):999-1008