Using the friction between business processes and use cases in SOA requirements

Proceedings - International Computer Software and Applications Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 601-606

  Knauss, Eric ^a   Lübke, Daniel ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTERS; DATA STRUCTURES; DECENTRALIZED CONTROL; FRICTION; INFORMATION SERVICES; MOCKUPS; PROCESS ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES; WORD PROCESSING;

BUSINESS PROCESSES; BUSINESS PROCESSING; DATA MODELLING; SERVICE-ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE PROJECTS; USE CASES;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 51949115861     PISSN: 07303157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/COMPSAC.2008.136     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. A. Cockburn. Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley Professional, January 2000.
2. G. Fischer. Domain-Oriented Design Environments. Automated Software Engineering, 1:177-203, 1994.
3. D. C. Gause and G. M. Weinberg. Exploring Requirements: Quality Before Design. Dorset House Publishing Company, Incorporated, 1989.
4. E. Knauss. Einsatz computergestützter Kritiken für Anforderungen. GI Softwaretechnik-Trends, 27(1), Februar 2007.
5. E. Knauss and T. Flohr. Managing Requirement Engineering Processes by Adapted Quality Gateways and critiquebased RE-Tools. In Proceedings of Workshop on Measuring Requirements for Project and Product Success, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, November 2007. in conjunction with the IWSM-Mensura Conference.
6. D. Lübke. Transformation of Use Cases to EPC Models. In Proceedings of the EPK 2006 Workshop, Vienna, Austria, 2006.
7. D. Lübke. An Integrated Approach for Generation in Service-Oriented Architecture Projects. PhD thesis, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover, 2007.
8. N. Maiden, N. Seyff, P. Grnbacher, O. Otojare, and K. Mitteregger. Making Mobile Requirements Engineering Tools Usable and Useful. In Proc. of the 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
9. J. Mendling and M. Nüttgens. EPC Markup Language (EPML) - An XML-Based Interchange Format for Event-Driven Process Chains (EPC). Information Systems and e-Business Management (ISeB), 4(3):245-263, July 2005.
10. H. W. Nissen, M. A. Jeusfeld, M. Jarke, G. V. Zemanek, and H. Huber. Requirements analysis from multiple perspectives: Experiences with conceptual modeling technology. In ICRE '96: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE '96), page 217, Washington, DC, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society.
11. B. Nuseibeh, J. Kramer, and A. Finkelstein. A Framework for expressing the relationships between multiple views in requirements specification. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 20:760-773, 1994.
12. S. Robertson and J. Robertson. Mastering the Requirements Process,. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
13. K. Sarshar and P. Loos. Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective. In W. van der Aalst, B. Benatallah, F. Casati, and F. Curbera, editors, Proceedings of the BPM 2005 (LNCS 3649), Nancy, France, pages 434-439. Springer Heidelberg, September 2005.
14. K. Schneider. Rationale Management in Software Engineering, chapter Rationale as a By-Product, pages 91-109. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006.
15. K. Schneider. Generating Fast Feedback in Requirements Elicitation. In Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2007), 2007.