Local deformation models for monocular 3D shape recovery

26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Salzmann, Mathieu ^a   Urtasun, Raquel ^b   Fua, Pascal ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; COMPUTER VISION; DEFORMATION; EDUCATION; FEATURE EXTRACTION; IMAGE PROCESSING; KETONES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PAPER; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURFACES;

3-D SHAPE; ARBITRARY SHAPES; DEFORMABLE SURFACES; DEFORMATION MODELING; IMAGE INFORMATIONS; LOCAL DEFORMATIONS; PRIOR KNOWLEDGE; SHAPE PRIORS; STATISTICAL LEARNING METHODS; TEXTURED SURFACES; TISSUE PAPER; UNDER-CONSTRAINED;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 51949104777     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587499     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. V. Blanz and T. Vetter. A Morphable Model for The Synthesis of 3.D Faces. In ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 187-194, 1999.
2. L. Cohen and I. Cohen. Deformable models for 3-d medical images using finite elements and balloons. In CVPR, pages 592-598, 1992.
3. T. Cootes, G. Edwards, and C. Taylor. Active Appearance Models. In ECCV, pages 484-498, 1998.
4. H. Delingette, M. Hebert, and K. Ikeuchi. Deformable surfaces: A free-form shape representation. In Geometric Methods in Computer Vision, volume 1570, pages 21-30, 1991.
5. G. Hinton. Products of experts. In ICANN, pages 1. 6, 1999. [6] M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active Contour Models. IJCV, 1(4):321-331, 1988.
6. N. D. Lawrence. Gaussian Process Models for Visualisation of High Dimensional Data. In NIPS, 2004.
7. N. D. Lawrence. Learning for Larger Datasets with the Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model. In AISTATS, 2007.
8. X. Llado, A. Del Bue, and L. Agapito. Non-rigid 3D Factorization for Projective Reconstruction. In BMVC, 2005.
9. I. Matthews and S. Baker. Active Appearance Models Revisited. IJCV, 60:135-164, 2004.
10. T. McInerney and D. Terzopoulos. A Finite Element Model for 3D Shape Reconstruction and Nonrigid Motion Tracking. In ICCV, pages 518-523, 1993.
11. D. Metaxas and D. Terzopoulos. Constrained deformable superquadrics and nonrigid motion tracking. PAMI, 15(6):580-591, 1993.
12. R. Navaratnam, A. Fitzgibbon, and R. Cipolla. The Joint Manifold Model for Semi-supervised Multi-valued Regression. In ICCV, 2007.
13. A. Pentland. Automatic extraction of deformable part models. IJCV, 4(2):107-126, 1990.
14. M. Salzmann, V. Lepetit, and P. Fua. Deformable Surface Tracking Ambiguities. In CVPR, 2007.
15. M. Salzmann, J. Pilet, S. Ilić, and P. Fua. Surface Deformation Models for NonRigid 3D Shape Recovery. PAMI, 29(8):1481-1487, 2007.
16. L. Torresani, A. Hertzmann, and C. Bregler. Learning nonrigid 3d shape from 2d motion. In NIPS, 2003.
17. R. Urtasun, D. Fleet, A. Hertzman, and P. Fua. Priors for people tracking from small training sets. In ICCV, 2005.
18. R. White and D. Forsyth. Combining cues: Shape from shading and texture. In CVPR, 2006.