Impact appraisal of regional innovation policy measures on automotive industry competitiveness: A search after better practices

International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 401-430

  Kamp, Bart ^a,b,c,d  

^a INNOVA Europe   (Belgium)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d Study of the Automobile Industry and its Employees GERPISA   (France)

Author keywords

Automotive industry; Benchmarking; Good practices; Impact assessment; R D and innovation policies; Regional economies

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; BENCHMARKING; REGIONAL PLANNING;

GOOD PRACTICES; IMPACT ASSESSMENTS; INDUSTRIAL COMPETITIVENESS; INDUSTRY COMPETITIVENESS; INNOVATION POLICIES; REGIONAL ECONOMY; REGIONAL INNOVATION POLICY; SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION;

COMPETITION;

EID: 51949103471     PISSN: 14709511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2008.020311     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ACEA (2006) EU-15 Economic Report, Brussels, November.
2. ACENET (2003) Final Report of Thematic Network on 'Accelerating the Establishment of Clusters and Company Networks', IPS-2000-1039.
3. ADE (2006) 'Description of regional automotive industry Castilla y Leon', www.automotive-regions.org.
4. Arrow, K.J. (1962) 'Economic welfare and the allocation of resources of invention', in R.R. Nelson (Ed.) The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research, pp.609-625.
5. CLEPA (2006) Future Perspectives of the Automotive Industry in Western Europe (PPT-presentation), Genk, 22 May.
6. DG Enterprise (2001) Methodology for Regional and Transnational Technology Clusters: Learning with European Best Practices, Brussels.
7. EMF (2005) Position Paper, Brussels.
8. European Commission (2004) Evaluating EU Activities. A Practical Guide for the Commission Services, Brussels, July.
9. European Commission (2005) European Competitiveness Report 2004, Brussels.
10. European Commission (2006) Study on Indicators for Monitoring for Transnational and Interregional Cooperation Programmes, Brussels, June.
11. Georghiou, L. (2003) 'Evaluation of behavioral additionality', Concept paper for OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy, Working Party on Innovation and Technology Policy, Paris.
12. Heijs, J. (1999) Innovation, Technology Policy and Regional Development, Budapest.
13. IMU & IAW (2005) Cluster Report Stuttgart Region, Stuttgart.
14. INNO Appraisal (2008) Phase 1 Descriptive Statistics Report, Manchester.
15. INSEE (2005) Bulletin with Regard to the Regional Automotive Sector, Franche-Comté.
16. Little, A.D. (2005) Global Innovation Excellence Survey, Rotterdam.
17. Mani, S. (2002) Government, Innovation and Technology Policy, An International Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
18. Mariussen, A. (Ed.) (2001) Cluster Policies - Cluster Development?, Stockholm.
19. Mercer/Fraunhofer Institute (2005) FAST 2015, Stuttgart.
20. Parsons, W. (1999) Public Policy - An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis, Cheltenham.
21. Pedrosa Sanz, R. (1997) Efectos de la innovacion tecnologica en el sistema productivo de Castilla y Leon, Valladolid.
22. PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2005) Global Automotive Financial Review 2004, London.
23. Province of Turin (2006) 'Description of regional automotive industry Province of Turin', www.automotive-regions.org.
24. Technologie- und Gründerzentrum Bautzen GmbH (2004) Grensland Cluster Report, Chemnitz.
25. Tödtling, F. (2001) Cluster Policies - Cluster Development?, in A. Mariussen (Ed.), Stockholm.
26. Xunta de Galicia (2006) 'Description of regional automotive industry Galicia', www.automotive-regions.org.