The importance of incorporating protogynous sex change into stock assessments

Bulletin of Marine Science

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 163-179

  Alonzo, Suzanne H ^a   Ish, Teresa ^b   Key, Meisha ^c   MacCall, Alec D ^c   Mangel, Marc ^d  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND   (United States)

^c SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^d University of California Santa Cruz   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EXPLOITATION; PERCIFORM; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX REVERSAL; SPAWNING; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

PISCES; SEMICOSSYPHUS PULCHER;

EID: 51949093170     PISSN: 00074977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Adreani, M. S., B. E. Erisman, and R. R. Warner. 2004. Courtship and spawning behavior in the California sheephead, Semicossyphus pulcher (Pisces: Labridae). Environ. Biol. Fish. 71: 13-19.
2. Alonzo, S. H. and M. Mangel. 2004. The effects of size-selective fisheries on the stock dynamics of and sperm limitation in sex changing fish: California sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) as an illustrative example. Fish. Bull., U.S., 102: 1-13.
3. _ and _. 2005. Sex change rules, stock dynamics, and the performance of spawning per recruit measures in protogynous stocks. Fish. Bull., U.S., 103: 229-245.
4. _, M. Key, T. Ish, and A. MacCall. 2004. Status of the California Sheephead (Semicossyphus pulcher) stock. California Department of Fish and Game Report, 〈www.dfg.ca.gov/mrd/sheephead2004〉.
5. Ayres, W. O. 1854. Description of new fishes from California. Proc. Calif. Acad. Natl. Sci. 1: 3-22.
6. Bernardi, G., L. Findley, and A. Rocha-Olivares. 2003. Vicariance and dispersal across Baja California in disjunct marine fish populations. Evolution 57: 1599-1609.
7. Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Møller. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego. 826 p.
8. Breder, C. M. and D. E. Rosen. 1966. Modes of reproduction in fishes. T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 941 p.
9. Caselle, J. E. and S. Hamilton. 2006. California sheephead stock assessment. California Department of Fish and Game Report P0470012.
10. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2002. Nearshore fishery management plan. California Department of Fish and Game, Marine Region, Monterey, California. 222 p.
11. Coleman, F. C., A. Eklund, and C. B. Grimes. 1999. Management and conservation of temperate reef fishes in the grouper-snapper complex of the southeastern United States. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 23: 233-242.
12. Conover, D. O. and S. B. Munch. 2002. Sustaining fisheries yields over evolutionary time scales. Science 297: 94-96.
13. Cowen, R. K. 1985. Large-scale pattern of recruitment by the labrid, Semicossyphus pulcher: causes and implications. J. Mar. Res. 43: 719-742.
14. _. 1990. Sex change and life history patterns of the labrid, Semicossyphus pulcher, across an environmental gradient. Copeia 1990: 787-795.
15. Davis, G. E. and T. W. Anderson. 1989. Population estimates of four kelp forest fishes and an evaluation of three in situ assessment techniques. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44: 1138-1151.
16. de Roos, A. M., D. S. Boukal, and L. Persson. 2006. Evolutionary regime shifts in age and size at maturation of exploited fish stocks. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 273: 1873-1880.
17. DeMartini, E. E., A. M. Barnett, T. D. Johnson, and R. F. Ambrose. 1994. Growth and production estimates for biomass-dominant fishes on a southern California artificial reef. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55: 484-500.
18. Fitch, J. E. 1974. Offshore fishes of California. Department of Fish and Game, State of California, Sacramento, California. 79 p.
19. Ford, E. 1933. An account of the herring investigations conducted at Plymouth during the years from 1924-1933. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 19: 305-384.
20. Garant, D., I. A. Fleming, S. Einum, and L. Bernatchez. 2003. Alternative male life-history tactics as potential vehicles for speeding introgression of farm salmon traits into wild populations. Ecol. Lett. 6: 541-549.
21. Helfman, G. S., B. B. Collette, and D. E. Facey. 1997. The diversity of fishes. Blackwell Science, Maiden. 528 p.
22. Heppell, S. S., S. A. Heppell, F. C. Coleman, and C. C. Koenig. 2006. Models to compare management options for a protogynous fish. Ecol. Appl. 16: 238-249.
23. Hilborn, R. and M. Mangel. 1997. The ecological detective: confronting models with data. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton. 315 p.
24. Hoenig, J. M. 1983. Empirical use of longevity data to estimate mortality rates. Fish. Bull., U.S., 81: 898-903.
25. Limbaugh, C. 1955. Fish life in the kelp beds and the effects of kelp harvesting. University of California, Institute of Marine Resources, La Jolla.
26. Lorenzen, K. and K. Enberg. 2002. Density-dependent growth as a key mechanism in the regulation of fish populations: evidence from among-population comparisons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269: 49-54.
27. Lutnesky, M. M. F. 1994. Density-dependent protogynous sex change in territorial haremic fishes: models and evidence. Behav. Ecol. 5: 375-383.
28. Methot, R. D. 1990. Synthesis model: an adaptable framework for analysis of diverse stock assessment data. Pages 259-277 in L. L. Low, ed. Proc. Symp. Application of Stock Assessment Techniques to Gadids. International Northern Pacific Fisheries Committee Bulletin. Seattle, Washington.
29. _. 1998. Program documentation for the Stock Synthesis model. Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service. 40 p.
30. _. 2000. Technical description of the Stock Synthesis assessment program. U.S. Department of Commerce. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-43. 46 p.
31. Olsen, E. M., M. Heino, G. R. Lilly, M. J. Morgan, J. Brattey, B. Ernande, and U. Dieckmann. 2004. Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature 428: 932-935.
32. Palmer-Zwahlen, M., J. O'Brien, and L. Laughlin. 1993. Live-fish trap fishery in southern California 1989-1992 and recommendations for management. Marine Resources Division, Department of Fish and Game, State of California, Sacramento, California.
33. Pitcher, T .J. 1993. Behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman and Hall, London. 715 p.
34. Quinn, T. J. and R. B. Deriso. 1999. Quantitative fish dynamics. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 542 p.
35. Rosales-Casian, J. A. and J. R. Gonzalez-Camacho. 2003. Abundance and importance of fish species from the artisanal fishery on the Pacific Coast of Northern Baja California. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 102: 51-65.
36. Stephens, J. 2001. California sheephead. Pages 155-156 in W. S. Leet, C. M. Dewees, R. Klingbeil, and E. J. Larson, eds. California's living marine resources: a status report. The Resources Agency, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.
37. Thresher, R. E. 1984. Reproduction in reef fishes T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City. 399 p.
38. Waples, R. S. and R. H. Rosenblatt. 1987. Patterns of larval drift in southern California USA marine shore fishes inferred from allozyme data. Fish. Bull., U.S., 85: 1-12.
39. Warner, R. R. 1975. The reproductive biology of the protogynous hermaphrodite Pimelometopon pulchrum (Pisces: Labridae). Fish. Bull., U.S.. 73: 262-283.
40. _ and S. E. Swearer. 1991. Social control of sex change in the bluehead wrasse, Thalassoma bifasciatum (Pisces, Labridae). Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole) 181: 199-204.
41. Young, K. and C. Lowe. 2006. Breeding season assessment of gonadal form and function in California sheephead. California Department of Fish and Game Report, Sacramento, California.