Consequences of poor power quality - An overview

Proceedings of the Universities Power Engineering Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 651-656

  Bhattacharyya, S ^a   Myrzik, J M A ^a   Kling, W L ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Point of connection; Power quality; Responsibility sharing; Sensitive devices; Standard

Indexed keywords

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS; ELECTRONIC DEVICES; EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS; FINANCIAL IMPACTS; HIGH-QUALITY POWER; NETWORK OPERATORS; NON-LINEAR CHARACTERISTICS; POINT OF CONNECTION; POWER ENGINEERING; POWER QUALITY (PQ); POWER SUPPLIES; QUALITY ASPECTS; RESPONSIBILITY SHARING; SENSITIVE DEVICES; STANDARD;

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; COMPETITION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ELECTRIC MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRIC POWER TRANSMISSION NETWORKS; ELECTRIC POWER UTILIZATION; SALES; STANDARDS; TECHNOLOGY;

POWER QUALITY;

EID: 51849162471     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/UPEC.2007.4469025     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. An ERGEG public consultation paper, Towards voltage quality regulation in Europe, ref: E06-EQS-09-03, December 2006.
2. Cobben J.F.G, Casteren J.F.L. van, Classification methodologies for power quality, Electrical Power Quality and Utilization, Magazine Vol II, No.1, 2006.
3. Johnson P., Coney R., Introducing national quality of supply (power quality) standards the South African experience, 10th International Conference on Electromagnetic Compatibility, September 1997.
4. Melhorn C.J, Maitra A, Sunderman W, Waclawiak M, Sundaram A, Distribution system power quality assessment phase-II: voltage sag and interruption analysis, copyright IEEE, paper no. PCIC- 2005-13.
5. Emanuel A. E., McNeill J.A., Electric power quality, Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 1997.
6. Task force 38.06.01. Methods to consider customer interruption costs in power system analysis, technical report, CIGRE, 2001.
7. Laborelec and KEMA T&D Consulting, Power quality op het Aansluitpunt -fase 1: inventarisatie en probleembeschrijving, February 2006, Doc. No.: 40530061-TDC 05-54719A (available in Dutch).
8. Enslin J.H.R, Heskes P.J.M, Harmonic interaction between a large number of distributed power inverters and the distribution network, IEEE transactions on power electronics, vol 19, no.6, 2004.
9. Bollen, M.H.J., Understanding power quality problems - voltage sags and interruption, IEEE press series of Power Engineering, pp. 255, 2000.
10. Keulenaer H. De., Power quality self-assessment guide, Power Quality Application Guide 1-1, November 2002. www.1pdi.org [15.06.07]
11. Cobben, J.F.G, A customer oriented approach to the classification of voltage dips, presented in the round table (session 2) of CIRED 2005, Torino June 2005.
12. Bendre A, Divan D, Kranz W, Brumsickle W, Equipment failures caused by power quality disturbances, Industry Applications Conference, October 2004.
13. Iglesias J.Luis.G, McEachern A, The economics of power quality - a systematic framework for the assessment, 19th International Conference on Electricity Distribution, CIRED 2007, Vienna.
14. Targosz R, Manson J, PAN European LPQI power quality survey, 19th International Conference on Electricity Distribution, CIRED 2007, Vienna.
15. Lineweber, D, McNulty, S.R., The cost of power disturbances to industrial & digital economy companies, a Primen report from EPRI (CEIDS), June 2001. www.epri.com/ceids [15.06.07]