Neighbor-constrained active contours without edges

2008 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPR Workshops

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Mao, Hongda ^a   Liu, Huafeng ^a   Shi, Pengcheng ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Rochester Institute of Technology

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER VISION; COPYING; DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; DIFFERENTIATION (CALCULUS); FEATURE EXTRACTION; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; MEDICAL IMAGING; NOISE POLLUTION; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PIXELS;

ACTIVE CONTOURS; FINITE DIFFERENCING; GEOMETRIC DEFORMABLE MODELS; IMAGE INFORMATIONS; IMAGE POINTS; INTENSITY INHOMOGENEITY; MUMFORD-SHAH ENERGY; NEIGHBORING INFORMATION; NOISE IMPACTS; PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL; PIXEL-DOMAIN; POINT OF INTEREST; REAL IMAGES; REGION-BASED; SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 51849141755     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562995     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. V. Caselles, R. Kimmel, and G. Sapiro. Geodesic active contours. International Journal of Computer Vision, 22:61-79, 1997.
2. T. Chan and A. Vese. Active contours without edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10:266-276, 2001.
3. W. Guo and Y. Chen. using non-parametric kernel to segment and smooth images simultaneously. Processings of International Conference in Image Processing, pages 217-220, 2006.
4. M. Kass, A. Witkin, and D. Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active contour models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1:321-331, 1987.
5. C. Li, C. Kao, J. C. Gore, and Z. Ding. Implicit active contour driven by local binary fitting energy. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognotion(CVPR), 1:1-7, 2007.
6. H. Liu, Y. Chen, W. Chen, and P. Shi. Neighborhood aided implicit active contours. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognotion(CVPR), 1:841-848, 2006.
7. R. Malladi, J. A. Sethian, and B. C. Vemuri. Shape modeling with front porpagation: a level set approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17:158-175, 1995.
8. D. Mumford and J. Shah. Optimal approximation by piecewise smooth functions and associated variational problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math, 42:577-685, 1989.
9. S. Osher and J. Sethian. Fronts propagating with curvaturedependent speed: Algorithms based on hamilton-jacobi formulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 79:12-49, 1988.
10. N. Paragios and R. Deriche. Coupled geodesic active contour regions for image segmentation: A level set approach. ECCV, 2:224-240, 2000.
11. A. Tsai, A. Yezzi, and A. S. Willsky. Curve evolution implementation of the mumford-shah functional for image segmentation, denoising, interpolation, and magnification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 10:1169-1186, 2001.
12. L. A. Vese and T. Chan. A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the mumford and shah model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 50:271-293, 2002.