What differentiates a winning agent: An information gain based analysis of TAC-SCM

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-07-13, Issue , 2007, Pages 1-10

  Andrews, James ^a   Benisch, Michael ^a   Sardinha, Alberto ^a   Sadeh, Norman ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGENT BEHAVIORS; AGENT DESIGN; AMOUNT OF INFORMATION; BEHAVIORAL FEATURES; HISTORICAL DATA; INFORMATION GAIN; LEAD-TIME; PROCUREMENT DECISIONS; SELLING PRICES; TECHNICAL REPORTS; TRADING AGENT COMPETITION; VISUAL INSPECTION;

COMMERCE; COMPETITION; GAME THEORY; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; SUPPLY CHAINS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

AGENTS;

EID: 51849138724     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Arunachalam, R., and Sadeh, N. 2005. The supply chain trading agent competition. Electronic Commerce Research Applications 4(1):63-81.
2. Benisch, M.; Andrews, J.; Bangerter, D.; Kirchner, T.; Tsai, B.; and Sadeh, N. 2005. CMieux analysis and instrumentation toolkit for TAC SCM. Technical Report CMU-ISRI-05-127, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
3. Benisch, M.; Andrews, J.; Sardinha, A.; and Sadeh, N. 2006. CMieux: Adaptive strategies for supply chain management. In Proceedings of International Conference on Electronic Commerce (ICEC).
4. Borghetti, B.; Sodomka, E.; Gini, M.; and Collins, J. 2006. A market-pressure-based performance evaluator for TAC-SCM. In Proceedings of AAMAS Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis (TADA).
5. Chopra, S., and Meindl, P. 2004. Supply Chain Management. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
6. Collins, J.; Arunachalam, R.; Sadeh, N.; Eriksson, J.; Finne, N.; and Janson, S. 2006. The supply chain management game for 2006 trading agent competition (TAC SCM). Technical Report CMU-ISRI-05-132, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
7. He, M.; Rogers, A.; David, E.; and Jennings, N. R. 2005. Designing and evaluating an adaptive trading agent for supply chain management applications. In Proceedings of IJCAI Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis (TADA).
8. He, M.; Rogers, A.; Luo, X.; and Jennings, N. R. 2006. Designing a successful trading agent for supply chain management. In Proceedings of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AA-MAS).
9. Jordan, P. R.; Kiekintveld, C.; Miller, J.; and Wellman, M. P. 2006. Market efficiency, sales competition, and the bullwhip effect in the TAC SCM tournaments. In Proceedings of AAMAS Workshop on Trading Agent Design and Analysis (TADA).
10. Kiekintveld, C.; Vorobeychik, Y.; and Wellman, M. 2006. An analysis of the 2004 supply chain management trading agent competition. In Poutr, H. L.; Sadeh, N.; and Janson, S., eds., Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce: Designing Trading Agents and Mechanisms, number 3937 in Lecture Notes in AI, 99-112. Springer-Verlag.
11. Mitchell, T. M. 1997. Machine Learning. McGraw Hill.
12. Pardoe, D., and Stone, P. 2006. Predictive planning for supply chain management. In Proceedings of Automated Planning and Scheduling.
13. Sadeh, N.; Hildum, D.; Kjenstad, D.; and Tseng, A. 1999. Mascot: an agent-based architecture for coordinated mixed-initiative supply chain planning and scheduling. In Proceedings of Agents Workshop on Agent-Based Decision Support in Managing the Internet-Enabled Supply-Chain.
14. Wellman, M. P.; Jordan, P. R.; Kiekintveld, C.; Miller, J.; and Reeves, D. M. 2006. Empirical game-theoretic analysis of the TAC market games. In Proceedings of AAMAS Workshop on Game-Theoretic and Decision-Theoretic Agents.