A discourse approach to explanation aware knowledge representation

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-07-06, Issue , 2007, Pages 56-63

  Potter, Andrew ^a  

^a Sentar Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN-COMPUTER COLLABORATION; INSTANTIATION PROCESS; REASONING CAPABILITIES; RHETORICAL STRUCTURE THEORY; TECHNICAL REPORTS; TOULMIN;

AGENTS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FLOW INTERACTIONS; INFORMATION THEORY; MAPS; TEXT PROCESSING;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

EID: 51849098448     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Dalianis, H., & Johannesson, P. 1999. Explaining conceptual models - Using Toulmin's argumentation model and RST. In Proceedings of the Third International workshop on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP98) (pp. 131-140). Stockholm, Sweden.
2. Grasso, F. 2002. Towards a framework for rhetorical argumentation. In Bos J., Foster M.E., Matheson C. editors, 6th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. Edinburgh, UK, 53-60.
3. Hobbs, J. R. 1990. Topic drift. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 3-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
4. Juthe, A. 2005. Argument by Analogy. Argumentation 19: 1-27.
5. Kato, Y., & Hori, K. 2005. A computational model of argumentative design rationale. Paper presented at the Fifth Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, Edinburgh, UK.
6. Mann, W. C. and Thompson, S. A. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Towards a functional theory of text organization. Text 8:243-281.
7. Moulin, B., Irandoust, H., Bélanger, M., and Desbordes, G. 2002. Explanation and argumentation capabilities: Towards the creation of more persuasive agents. Artificial Intelligence Review 17: 169-222.
8. Newman, S., & Marshall, C. 1991. Pushing Toulmin too far: Learning from an argument representation scheme (Technical Report SSL No. 92-45). Palo Alto, CA: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center.
9. Parsons, S., & McBurney, P. 2003. Argumentation-based communication between agents. In M. P. Huget (Ed.), Languages and Conversation Policies (pp. 164-178). Berlin: Springer.
10. Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IA: University of Notre Dame.
11. Pollock, J. L. 1995. Cognitive carpentry: A blueprint for how to build a person. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Potter, A. 2007. An investigation of interactional coherence in asynchronous learning environments. Ph.D. diss., Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
13. Prakken, H., 2005. A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning, in The Tenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 6-11, 2005 New York: ACM. 85-94.
14. Reed, C and Long, D. 1998. Generating the structure of argument. Proceedings of the 36th conference on Association for Computational Linguistics. East Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 1091-1097.
15. Sartor, G. 1993. A simple computational model for nonmonotonic and adversarial legal reasoning. ICAIL '93: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. New York: ACM Press. 192-201.
16. Thagard, P. 2000. Probabilistic networks and explanatory coherence. Cognitive Science Quarterly(1), 93-116.
17. Toulmin, S. E. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Walton, D. N. 1996. Argument structure: A pragmatic theory. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
19. Wærn, Y and Ramberg, R. 2004. Distributed knowledge by explanation networks. HICSS '04: Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'04) - Track 5 (p. 50132b). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
20. Ye, L. R. 1995. The value of explanation in expert systems for auditing: An experimental investigation. Expert Systems with Applications 9: 543-556.
21. Ye, L. R. and Johnson, P. E. 1995. The impact of explanation facilities on user acceptance of expert system's advice. MIS Quarterly 19: 157-172.