A framework for the integration of environmental and business aspects toward sustainable product development

Journal of Engineering Design

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 431-446

  Choi, J K ^a   Nies, L F ^b   Ramani, K ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Design for environment; Lifecycle assessment; Multi criteria decision making; Product design

Indexed keywords

EID: 51849086460     PISSN: 09544828     EISSN: 14661837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09544820701749116     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brezet, H. and Hemel, C.V., 1997. Ecodesign - a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption. New York: UNEP.
2. Choi, J.K., 2006. A systematic methodology for designing sustainable product system. Thesis (PhD). Purdue University, USA.
3. Consoli, F., Allen, D., Boustead, I., Fava, J., Franklin, W., Jensen, A.A., de Oude, N., Parrish, R., Perriman, R., Postlethwaite, D., Quay, B., Séguin, J. and Vigon, B., eds., 1993. Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a 'code of practice'. In: Workshop of society of environmental toxicology and chemistry (SETAC), 31 March-3 April 1993 Sesimbra, Portugal. Belgium: SETAC, 32-37.
4. Fiksel, J., 1996. Design for environment: creating eco-efficient products and processes. London: McGraw-Hill.
5. Graedel, T.E. and Allenby, B.R., 2003. Industrial Ecology. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 97-99.
6. Guineé, J.B., ed., 2002. Handbook on life cycle assessment - operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
7. Hauschild, M. and Wenzel, H., 1998. Environmental assessment of products, Vol. 2; Scientific background, London: Chapman and Hall, 47-51.
8. Heijungs, R., Guinée, J.B., Huppens, G., Lankreijer, R.M., Udo de Haes, H.A., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Ansems, A.M.M., Eggels, P.G., van Duin, R. and de Goede, H.P., 1992. Environmental life-cycle assessments of products. NOH report 9266. Leiden: Centre of Environmental Science.
9. Liberatore, M.J., 1987. An extension of the analytic hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection and resource allocation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34 (1), 8-12.
10. Miettinen, P. and Hämäläinen, R.P., 1997. How to benefit from decision analysis in environmental life cycle assessment (LCA). European Journal of Operational Research, 102, 279-294.
11. Mizuki, C., Sandborn, P.A. and Pitts, G., 1996. Design for environment - a survey of current practices and tools. In: Proceedings of 1996 IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 6-8 May 1996 Dallas, TX.New York: IEEE Conference Xpress, 1-6.
12. Saaty, T. L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Saaty, T.L., 1995.Decision making for leaders-the analytic hierarchy process for decisions inacomplex world. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS.
14. Weber, M. and Borcherding, K., 1993. Behavioural influences on weight judgments in multi-attribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 67 (1), 1-12.
15. Werner, F. and Scholz, R.W., 2002. Ambiguities in decision-oriented life cycle inventories. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 7 (6), 330-338.