A research agenda for sexual revictimization: Priority areas and innovative statistical methods

Violence Against Women

Volumn 14, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1128-1147

  Macy, Rebecca J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Research agenda; Revictimization; Sexual violence; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BATTERED WOMAN; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RECURRENT DISEASE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURVIVOR; VICTIM; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

BATTERED WOMEN; CRIME VICTIMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RECURRENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURVIVORS; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

EID: 51749120354     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801208322701     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Arata, C.M. (2002). Child sexual abuse and sexual revictimization. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 135-164.
2. Bauer, D.J., & Curran, P.J. (2003 a). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338-363.
3. Bauer, D.J., & Curran, P.J. (2003 b). Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: Much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf (2003), Muthn (2003). and Cudeck and Henly (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 384-393.
4. Bauer, D.J., & Curran, P.J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3-29.
5. Bent-Goodley, T.B. (2005). Culture and domestic violence: Transforming knowledge development. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 195-203.
6. Bhuyan, R., & Senturia, K. (2005). Understanding domestic violence resource utilization and survivor solutions among immigrant and refugee women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 895-901.
7. Blackwell, L.M., Lynn, S.J., Vanderhoff, H., & Gidycz, C. (2004). Sexual assault revictimization: Toward effective risk-reduction programs. In L. J. Koenig, L. S. Doll, A. O'Leary, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child sexual abuse to adult sexual risk trauma, revictimization, and intervention (pp. 269-295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Bogat, G.A., Levendosky, A.A., & von Eye, A. (2005). The future of research on intimate partner violence: Person-oriented and variable-oriented perspectives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 36 (1 / 2). 49-70.
9. Bollen, K.A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 605-634.
10. Bonanno, G.A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience. American Psychologist, 59, 20-28.
11. Breitenbecher, K.H. (2001). Sexual revictimization among women: A review of the literature focusing on empirical investigations. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 6, 415-432.
12. Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbush, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Carins, R.B., & Rodkin, P.C. (1998). Phenomena regained. In R. B. Carins, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 245-265). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Casey, E.A., & Nurius, P.S. (2005). Trauma exposure and sexual revictimization risk comparisons across single, multiple incident, and multiple perpetrator victimizations. Violence Against Women, 11, 505-530.
15. Chaffin, M., Wherry, J.N., Newline, C., Crutchfield, A., & Dykman, R. (1997). The Abuse Dimension Inventory. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 569-589.
16. Classen, C.C., Palesh, O.G., & Aggarwal, R. (2005). Sexual revictimization: A review of the empirical literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 103-129.
17. Cleland, C.M., Rothschild, L., & Haslam, N. (2000). Detecting latent taxa: Monte Carlo comparison of taxometric, mixture model, and clustering procedures. Psychological Reports, 87, 37-47.
18. Cohen, M.P. (1998). Determining sample sizes for surveys with data analyzed by hierarchical linear models. Journal of Official Statistics, 14, 267-275.
19. Curran, P.J., & Willoughby, M.T. (2003). Implications of latent trajectory models for the study of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 581-612.
20. Duncan, T.E., Duncan, S.C., Strycker, L.A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., & Morven, L. (2001). Cluster analysis (4 th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Fisher, B.S., Cullen, F.T., & Turner, M.G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (Research Report No. NCJ 182369). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23. Fraser, M.W., Richman, J.M., & Galinsky, M.J. (1999). Risk, protection, and resilience: Toward a conceptual framework for social work practice. Social Work Research, 23, 131-143.
24. Gibson, W.A. (1959). Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 24, 229-252.
25. Gold, S.R., Sinclair, B.B., & Balge, K.A. (1999). Risk of revictimization: A theoretical model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4, 457-470.
26. Graham, J.W., Collins, L.M., Wugalter, S.E., Chung, N.K., & Hansen, W.B. (1991). Modeling transitions in latent stage-sequential processes: A substance use prevention example. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 48-57.
27. Grauerholz, L. (2000). An ecological approach to understanding sexual revictimization: Linking personal, interpersonal, and sociocultural factors and processes. Child Maltreatment, 5, 5-17.
28. Guo, S. (2005). Analyzing grouped data with hierarchical linear modeling. Child and Youth Services Review, 27, 637-652.
29. Hagenaars, J.A., & Halman, L.C. (1989). Searching for idea types: The potentialities of latent class analysis. European Sociological Review, 5, 81-96.
30. Hinde, R.A. (1998). Through categories toward individuals: Attempting to tease apart the data. In R. B. Carins, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 11-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H.S., & DeSarbo, W.S. (1997). STEMM: A general finite mixture structural equation model. Journal of Classification, 14, 23-50.
32. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2 nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
33. Koss, M.P., & Gidycz, C.A. (1985). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422-423.
34. Koss, M.P., & Oros, C.J. (1982). Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455-457.
35. Kreft, I., & De Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
36. Little, T.D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J.R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When "good" indicators are bad and "bad" indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.
37. Logan, T.K., Walker, R., Cole, J., & Leukefeld, C. (2002). Victimization and substance abuse among women: Contributing factors, interventions, and implications. Review of General Psychology, 6, 325-397.
38. Luke, D.A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39. MacCallum, R.C., & Austin, J.T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
40. MacGreene, D., & Navarro, R.L. (1998). Situation specific assertiveness in the epidemiology of sexual victimization among university women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 589-604.
41. Macy, R.J. (2007). A coping theory framework for understanding and preventing revictimization. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 177-192.
42. Macy, R.J. (in press). Sexual revictimization: Implications for social work practice. Families in Society.
43. Macy, R.J., & Chapman, M. (2006, January). Using latent class analysis to move beyond aggregate findings: A conceptual and practical workshop using Mplus Software. Workshop presented at the Society for Social Work and Research Annual Conference, San Antonio, TX.
44. Macy, R.J., Nurius, P.S., & Norris, J. (2007). Latent profiles among sexual assault survivors: Understanding survivors and their assault experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22 (5). 520-542.
45. Magnusson, D. (1998). The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In R. B. Carins, L. R. Bergman, & J. Kagan (Eds.), Methods and models for studying the individual (pp. 33-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. McMillen, J.C., Zuravin, S., & Rideout, G.B. (1995). Perceived benefit from child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 1037-1043.
47. Messman-Moore, T.L., & Long, P.J. (2000). Child sexual abuse and revictimization in the form of adult sexual abuse, adult physical abuse, and adult psychological maltreatment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 489-502.
48. Messman-Moore, T.L., & Long, P.J. (2002). The role of childhood sexual abuse sequelae in the sexual revictimization of women: An empirical review and theoretical reformulation. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 537-571.
49. Messman-Moore, T.L., Long, P.J., & Siegfried, N.J. (2000). The revictimization of child sexual abuse survivors: An examination of the adjustment of college women with child sexual abuse, adult sexual assault, and adult physical abuse. Child Maltreatment, 5, 18-27.
50. Mitchell, C.M., & Plunkett, M. (2000). The latent structure of substance use among American Indian adolescents: An example using categorical variables. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 105-125.
51. Muthn, B.O. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class-latent growth modeling. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 289-322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52. Muthn, B.O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.
53. Muthn, B. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 369-377.
54. Muthn, B.O., & Curran, P.J. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371-402.
55. Muthn, L.K., & Muthn, B.O. (1998-2004). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Authors.
56. Nash, J.K., Kupper, L.L., & Fraser, M.W. (2004). Using multilevel statistical models in social work intervention research. Journal of Social Science Research, 30 (3). 35-54.
57. Noll, J. (2005). Does childhood sexual abuse set in motion a cycle of violence against women ? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 455-462.
58. Raudenbush, S.W. (2001). Toward a coherent framework for comparing trajectories of individual change. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 33-64). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
59. Resick, P.A. (1993). The psychological impact of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 223-255.
60. Rich, C.L., Combs-Lane, A.M., Resnick, H., & Kilpatrick, D.G. (2004). Child sexual abuse and adult sexual revictimization. In L. J. Koenig, L. S. Doll, A. O'Leary, & W. Pequegnat (Eds.), From child sexual abuse to adult sexual risk trauma, revictimization, and intervention (pp. 269-295). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
61. Roodman, A.A., & Clum, G.A. (2001). Revictimization rates and method variance: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 183-204.
62. Rozee, P.D., & Koss, M.P. (2001). Rape: A century of resistance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 295-311.
63. Ryff, C.D., & Singer, B. (2003). Flourishing under fire: Resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving. In C.L.M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 15-36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
64. Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
65. Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford.
66. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence Against Women, 6, 142-161.
67. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2006). Extent, nature and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
68. Updegraff, J.A., & Taylor, S.E. (2000). From vulnerability to growth: Positive and negative effects of stressful life events. In J. H. Harvey & E. D. Miller (Eds.), Loss and trauma: General and close relationship perspectives (pp. 3-28). Philadelphia: Brunner-Routledge.
69. Urquiza, A.J., & Goodlin-Jones, B.L. (1994). Child sexual abuse and adult revictimization with women of color. Violence and Victims, 9, 223-232.
70. Williams, L.M. (2003). Understanding child abuse and violence against women: A life course perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 441-451.
71. Yeater, E.A., & O' Donohue, W. (1999). Sexual assault prevention programs: Current issues, future directions, and the potential efficacy of interventions with women. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 739-771.