Behavioral assessments in Russian addiction treatment inpatients: A comparison of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing and interviewer-administered questionnaires

HIV Clinical Trials

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 247-253

  Edwards, Erika M ^a   Cheng, Debbie M ^a   Levenson, Suzette ^a   Bridden, Carly ^b   Meli, Seville ^b   Egorova, Valentina Y ^c   Krupitsky, Evgeny M ^c   Samet, Jeffrey H ^a,b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c PAVLOV FIRST SAINT PETERSBURG STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

HIV infections; Interview methods; Prevention and control; Russia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURAL FACTOR; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTED PATIENT; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INFECTION PREVENTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; VIRUS TRANSMISSION;

ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RUSSIA; SELF DISCLOSURE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SUBSTANCE ABUSE, INTRAVENOUS; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 51749113983     PISSN: 15284336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/hct0904-247     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rosenthal R, Persigner GW, Fode KL. Experimental bias, anxiety, and social desirability. Percept Mot Skills. 1962; 15:73-74.
2. Newman JC, Des Jarlais DC, Turner CF, Gribble J, Cooley P, Paone D. The differential effects of face-to-face and computer interview modes. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(2):294-297.
3. O'Reilly J, Hubbard M, Lessler P, et al. Audio and video computer-assisted self-interviewing: preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. J Off Stat. 1994;10: 197-214.
4. Ghanem KG, Hutton EH, Zenilman JM, Zimba R, Erbelding EJ. Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:421-425.
5. Rogers SM, Willis G, Al-Tayyib A, et al. Audio computer assisted interviewing to measure HIV risk behaviours in a clinic population. Sex Trans Infect. 2005;81:501-507.
6. Des Jarlais DC, Paone D, Milliken J, et al. Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behaviour for HIV among injecting drug users: a quasi-randomised trial. Lancet. 1999; 35:1657-1662.
7. Macalino GE, Celentano DD, latkin C, Strathdee SA, Vlahov D. Risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted self-interviews among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative injection drug users. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14:367-378.
8. Perlis TE, Des Jarlais DC, Friedman SR, Arasteh K, Turner CF. Audio-computerized self-interviewing versus face-to-face interviewing for research data collection at drug abuse treatment programs. Addiction. 2004;99:885-896.
9. Le LC, Blum RW, Magnani R, Hewett PC, Do HM. A pilot of audio computer-assisted self-interview for youth reproductive health research in Vietnam. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:740-747.
10. Hewett PC, Mensch BS, Erulkar AS. Consistency in the reporting of sexual behaviour by adolescent girls in Kenya: a comparison of interviewing methods. Sex Trans Infect. 2004;80(Suppl II):ii43-ii48.
11. Jaya, Hindin MJ, Ahmed S. Differences in young people's reports of sexual behaviors according to interview methodology: a randomized trial in India. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:169-174.
12. Simoes AA, Bastos FI, Moreira RI, Lynch KG, Metzger DS. A randomized trial of audio computer and in-person interview to assess HIV risk among alcohol and drug users in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30:237-243.
13. van de Wijert J, Padian N, Shiboski S, Turner C. Is audio computer-assisted self-interviewing a feasible method of surveying in Zimbabwe? Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:885-890.
14. Waruru AK, Nduati R, Tylleskär T. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) may avert socially desirable responses about infant feeding in the context of HIV. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2005;5:24.
15. Li L, Wu Z, Rotheram-Borus MJ, et al. Measuring sexual risk using audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) versus computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) in China. Int J Sexual Health. 2007;19(1):25-30.
16. NIMH Collaborative HIV/STD Prevention Trial Group. The feasibility of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in international settings. AIDS. 2007;21(Suppl 2):S49-S58.
17. UNAIDS. Russian Federation Report. Available at: http://www.unaids.org/ en/Regions_Countries/Countries/russian_federation.asp
18. Dehne KL, Pokrovskiy V, Kobyshcha Y, Schwartlander B. Update on the epidemics of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union. AIDS. 2000;14(Suppl 3):S75-S84.
19. Hamers FF, Downs AM. HIV in central and eastern Europe. Lancet. 2003;361:1035-1044.
20. Samet JH, Krupitsky EM, Cheng DM, et al. Mitigating risky sexual behavior among Russian narcology hospital patients: the PREVENT (Partnership to Reduce the Epidemic via Engagement in Narcology Treatment) randomized control trial. Addiction. Epub July 10, 2008.
21. Kamb ML, Fishbein M, Douglas JIM Jr, et al. Efficacy of risk reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: a randomized controlled trial. Project RESPECT Study Group. JAMA. 1998;280(13):1161-1167.
22. Navaline HA, Snider EC, Petro CJ, et al. Preparations for AIDS vaccine trials. An automated version of the Risk Assessment Battery (RAB): enhancing the assessment of risk behaviors. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1994;10(Suppl 2):281-283.
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.