Long-term outcome in patients with short bowel syndrome after longitudinal intestinal lengthening and tailoring

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 573-578

  Reinshagen, K ^a,c   Kabs, C ^a   Wirth, H ^a   Hable, N ^a   Brade, J ^b   Zahn, K ^a   Hagl, C ^a   Jester, I ^a   Waag, K L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Intestinal lengthening; Short bowel syndrome; Surgical treatment

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL CRAMP; ACIDOSIS; ARTICLE; CHILD; ECZEMA; EDUCATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROSCHISIS; HUMAN; INFANT; INTESTINE ATRESIA; INTESTINE SURGERY; INTESTINE VOLVULUS; JAUNDICE; LARGE INTESTINE; LIVER FUNCTION; LONG TERM CARE; LONGITUDINAL INTESTINAL LENGTHENING AND TAILORING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; ORGAN SIZE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD; SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME; SMALL INTESTINE; SOCIAL LIFE; STRENGTH; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; THROMBOSIS; VOMITING; WEANING; WEIGHT GAIN; BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; HISTOLOGY; INTESTINE; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MORTALITY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; SURVIVOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

BODY HEIGHT; BODY WEIGHT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFANT; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; INTESTINE, SMALL; INTESTINES; PARENTERAL NUTRITION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SHORT BOWEL SYNDROME; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 51749106722     PISSN: 02772116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31816232e3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bianchi A. From the cradle to enteral autonomy: the role of autologous gastrointestinal reconstruction. Gastroenterology 2006; 130:138-46.
2. Mackby MJ, Richards V, Gilfillan RS, et al. Methods of increasing the efficiency of residual small bowel segments: a preliminary study. Am J Surg 1965;109:32-8.
3. Hammer JM, Seay PH, Johnston RL, et al. The effect of antiper-istaltic bowel segments on intestinal emptying time. Arch Surg 1959;79:537-41.
4. Budding J, Smith CC. Role of recirculating loops in the management of massive resectionof the small intestine. Surg Gyncol Obstet 1967;125:243.
5. Bianchi A. Intestinal loop lengthening: a technique for increasing small intestinal length. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:145-51.
6. Kim H, Fauza D, Garza J, et al. Serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP): a novel bowel lengthening procedure. J Pediatr Surg 2003;38:425-9.
7. Modi BP, Javid PJ, Jaksic T, et al. International STEP Data Registry. First report of the international serial transverse enteroplasty data registry: indications, efficacy, and complications. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:365-71.
8. Dutta S. The STEP procedure: defining its role in the management of pediatric short bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007;45:174-5.
9. Hosie S, Loff S, Wirth H, et al. Experience of 49 longitudinal intestinal lengthening procedures for short bowel syndrome. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2006;16:171-5.
10. Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim J, et al. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: population-based estimates of incidence and mortality rates. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:690-5.
11. Wales PW, de Silva N, Kim JH, et al. Neonatal short bowel syndrome: a cohort study. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:755-62.
12. Weber TR, Powell MA. Early improvement in intestinal function after isoperistaltic bowel lengthening. J Pediatr Surg 1996;31: 61-4.
13. Chang RW, Javid PJ, Oh JT, et al. Serial transverse enteroplasty enhances intestinal function in a model of short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 2006;243:223-8.
14. Weber TR. Isoperistaltic bowel lengthening for short bowel syndrome in children. Am J Surg 1999;178:600-4.
15. Thompson JS, Pinch LW, Young R, et al. Long-term outcome of intestinal lengthening. Transplant Proc 2000;32:1242-3.
16. Bueno J, Guiterrez J, Mazariegos GV, et al. Analysis of patients with longitudinal intestinal lengthening procedure referred for intestinal transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:178-83.
17. Farnsworth N, Fagan SP, Berger DH, et al. Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg 2004;188: 580-3.
18. Keegan MT, Plevak DJ. Preoperative assessment of the patient with liver disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2116-27.
19. Ruiz P, Kato T, Tzakis A. Current status of transplantation of the small intestine. Transplantation 2007;83:1-6.
20. VanGossum A, Bakker H, Bozzetti M, et al. Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey in 1997. Clin Nutr 1999;18:135.
21. Cowles RA, Lobritto SJ, Stylanios S, et al. Serial transverse enteroplasty in a newborn patient. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007;45:257-60.
22. Sudan D, Thompson J, Botha J, et al. Comparison of intestinal lengthening procedures for patients with short bowel syndrome. Ann Surg 2007;246:593-604.
23. Ehrlich PF, Mychaliska GB, Teitelbaum DH. The 2 STEP: an approach to repeating a serial transverse enteroplasty. J Pediatr Surg 2007;42:819-22.
24. Abu-Elmagd KM, Zak M, Stamos JM, et al. De novo malignancies after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Transplantation 2004;77:1719-25.