Talking about taste: Disagreement, implicit arguments, and relative truth

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 691-706

  Stojanovic, Isidora ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Content; Context; Contextualism; Disagreement; Implicit arguments; Predicates of taste; Relativism; What is said

Indexed keywords

EID: 51749096891     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: 15730549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-008-9030-5     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Condoravdi, C., & Gawron, J.-M. (1996). The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In M. Kanazawa et al. (Eds.), Quantifiers, deduction and context (pp. 3-27). CSLI Publications.
2. Donnellan K. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75: 281-303
3. Glanzberg M. (2007). Context, content and relativism. Philosophical Studies 132: 1-16
4. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog et al. (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 581-563). Oxford University Press.
5. Kölbel, M. (2002). Truth without objectivity. Routledge.
6. Lasersohn P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 643-686
7. MacFarlane J. (2007). Relativism and disagreement. Philosophical Studies 132: 17-32
8. Partee B. (1989). Binding implicit variables in quantified contexts. Papers of Chicago Linguistic Society 25: 342-365
9. Predelli S. (2005a). Contexts. Meaning, truth and the use of language. Oxford University Press, Oxford
10. Predelli S. (2005b). Painted leaves, context and semantic analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351-374
11. Stephenson T. (2007). Judge dependence, epistemic modals and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 487-525
12. Stojanovic, I. (2006). What is said, linguistic meaning, and directly referential expressions. Philosophy Compass 1, http://www.blackwell-compass.com/ subject/philosophy/.
13. Stojanovic, I. (2007). What is said. An inquiry into reference, meaning, and content. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University.
14. van Benthem J. (1983). Modal logic and classical logic. Bibliopolis, Naples