Re: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: Patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems [2]

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 100, Issue 17, 2008, Pages 1263-1264

  Deye, James ^a,c   Purdy, James ^b   Vikram, Bhadrasain ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c EPN 6018 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; DATA BASE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; KNOWLEDGE; LETTER; ONCOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; CANCER CENTER; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOTHERAPY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; NOTE; RADIATION DOSE; STANDARD;

CANCER CARE FACILITIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; NEOPLASMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED;

EID: 51749095120     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djn236     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Das IJ, Cheng C-W, Chopra KL, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription, recording, and delivery: patterns of variability among institutions and treatment planning systems. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(5):300-307.
2. Willins J, Kachnic L. Clinically relevant standards for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(5):288-290.
3. Palta JR, Deye JA, Ibbott GS, et al. Credentialing of institutions for IMRT in clinical trials (Correspondence). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(43):1257-1259.