Analysis of mammogram using self-organizing neural networks based on spatial isomorphism

IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1796-1801

  Ferreira, Aida A ^a   Nascimento Jr , Francisco ^a   Tsang, Ing Ren ^a   Cavalcanti, George D C ^a   Ludermir, Teresa B ^a   De Aquino, Ronaldo R B ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMOGRAPHY; NEURAL NETWORKS; SET THEORY; X RAY SCREENS;

CANCER DETECTION; MAMMOGRAM IMAGES; MAMMOGRAPHY IMAGES; OBJECT BOUNDARIES; ORIGINAL ALGORITHMS; POOR PERFORMANCE; SELF ORGANIZATIONS; SELF-ORGANIZING NEURAL NETWORK;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 51749090000     PISSN: 10987576     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IJCNN.2007.4371230     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Y. V. Venkatesh and N. Rishikesh. "Self-organizing neural networks based on spatial isomorphism for active contour modeling" in Pattern Recognition. vol. 33. J. Peters. Ed. Elsevier. 2000. pp. 1239-1250.
2. N.S. Ganesh Murthy. Y.V.Venkatesh. "Pattern encoding and classification by neural networks". Neural Computing submitted for publication.
3. K.Shanmukh. C.N.S. Ganesh Murthy. Y.V.Venkatesh. "Classification using self-organizing networks spatially isomorphic to patterns". International Conference on Robotic Vision for Industry and Automation. ROVPIA96. Malaysia. 1996. pp. 298-303.
4. A.P.Braga. T.B.Ludermir. A.C.P.L.F.Carvalho. Redes Neurais Artificiais - Teoria e Aplicações. Editora LTC. 2000.
5. S. Haykin. "Neural Networks: a comprehensive foundation" . Prentice Hall, Inc. 1999.
6. M.Kass. A.Witkin. D.Terzopoulos. Snakes: Active Contour Models. International Journal of Computer Vision. 1988. pp321-331.
7. H.Shah-Hosseini. R.Safabakhsh. A TASOM-based algorithm for active contour modeling. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2002. pp. 1361-1373.
8. Y.V.Venkatesh. S.K.Raja. N.Ramya. Multiple Countor Extraction Graylevel Images Using an Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 2006. vol. 15. n. 4. pp. 1057-7149.
9. http://peipa.essex.ac.uk/info/mias.html. "mini-MIAS database of mammograms".
10. V. Hadziavdic. "A Comparative Study of Active Contour Models for Boundary Detection in Brain Images". Diploma Project. Faculty for Mathematical and Natural Sciences, University of Tromso, 1999.
11. D. Terzopoulous and K. Fleischer, "Deformable models", Vis. Comput. Vol. 4, pp. 306-331, 1988.
12. R. Durikovic, K. Kaneda, and H. Yamashita, "Dynamic contour: A texture approach and contour operations," Vis. Comput. Vol 11, pp. 277-289, 1995.
13. Chenyang Xu, Jerry L. Prince, "Snakes, Shapes, and Gradient Vector Flow", IEEE Transaction on Image Processing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 359-369, 1998.
14. Isaac N. Bankman, Tanya Nizialek, Inpakala Simon, Olga B. Gatewood, Irving N. Weinberg and William R. Brody, "Segmentation Algorithm for Detecting Microcalcifications in Mammograms," IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 1, no.2, pp. 141-149, 1997.
15. H. D. Cheng, Xiaopeng Cai, Xiaowei Chen, Liming Hu, Xueling Lou, "Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: a survey," Pattern Recognition 36, pp. 2967-2991, 2003
16. C. B. R. Ferreira, D. L. Borges, "Analysis of mammogram classification using a wavelet transform decomposition," Pattern Recognition Letters 24, pp. 973-982, 2003.
17. A.Jebal, T. Murray, A. Samuels, A. Ghafoor, E. Ward, M. Thun, "Cancer statistics, 2003," CA Cancer J. Clin., vol. 53, pp.5-26, 2003.