User developed application success: Sources and effects of involvement

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 407-422

  McGill, T ^a   Klobas, J ^b,c  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Information systems success; Involvement; Participation; User developed applications

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUCCESS; INVOLVEMENT; PARTICIPATION; SYSTEM QUALITY; USER DEVELOPED APPLICATIONS;

CLARIFICATION;

EID: 51749084159     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290601110715     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Amoako-Gyampah, K. and White, K.B., 1993. User involvement and user satisfaction: an exploratory contingency model. Information and Management, 25, 25-33.
2. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., 1988. Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
3. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W., 1992. Assumptions and comparative strengths of the two-step approach: comment on Fornell and Yi. Sociological Methods and Research, 20, 321-333.
4. Bagozzi, R.P. and Edwards, J.R., 1998. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 103, Or 1:3, 411-423.
5. Bagozzi, R.P. and Heatherton, T.F., 1994. A General approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-67.
6. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J., 1989. Rethinking the concept of user involvement. Mis Quarterly, 13, 52-63.
7. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J., 1991. User participation and user involvement in information system development. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Vol. 4, 487-492.
8. Baroudi, J.J., Olson, M.H., and Ives, B., 1986. An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of The Acm, 29, 232-238.
9. Blili, S., Raymond, L., and Rivard, S., 1998. Impact of task uncertainty, end-user involvement, and competence on the success of end-user computing. Information and Management, 33, 137-153.
10. Cavaye, A.L.M., 1995. User participation in system development revisited. Information and Management, 30, 311-323.
11. Cheney, P.H., Mann, R.I., and Amoroso, D.L., 1986. Organizational factors affecting the success of end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3, 65-80.
12. Chin, W.W. and Todd, P.A., 1995. On the use, usefulness, and ease of structural equation modeling in mis research: a note of caution. Mis Quarterly, 19, 237-247.
13. Delone, W.H. and Mclean, E.R., 1992. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 60-95.
14. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G., 1988. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. Mis Quarterly, 12, 259-274.
15. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G., 1989. A discrepancy model of end-user computing involvement. Management Science, 35, 1151-1171.
16. Doll, W.J. and Torkzadeh, G., 1991. A congruence construct of user involvement. Decision Sciences, 22, 443-453.
17. Edberg, D.T. and Bowman, B., 1996. User-developed applications: an empirical study of application quality and developer productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, 167-185.
18. Etezadi-Amoli, J. and Farhoomand, A.F., 1996. A structural model of end user computing satisfaction and user performance. Information and Management, 30, 65-73.
19. Fornell, C. and Bookstein, F.L., 1982. Two structural equation models: lisrel and pls applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440-452.
20. Franz, C.R. and Robey, D., 1986. Organizational contexts, user involvement and the usefulness of information systems. Decision Sciences, 17, 329-356.
21. Gatian, A.W., 1994. Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Information and Management, 26, 119-131.
22. Gelderman, M., 1998. The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance. Information and Management, 34, 11-18.
23. Goodhue, D., 1995. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Science, 41, 1827-1844.
24. Goodhue, D., Klein, B.D., and March, S.T., 2000. User evaluations of is as surrogates for objective performance. Information and Management, 38, 87-101.
25. Govindarajulu, C., 2003. End users: who are they? Communications of the Acm, 46, 152-159.
26. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C., 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
27. Hall, M.J.J., 1996. A risk and control oriented study of the practices of spreadsheet application developers. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3-6 January. Maui, Hawaii, 364-372.
28. Hartwick, J. and Barki, H., 1994. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40, 440-465.
29. Hawk, S.R., 1993. The effects of user involvement: some personality determinates. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 839-855.
30. Hayduk, L., 1996. Lisrel Issues, Debates, and Strategies. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Holmes-Smith, P. and Rowe, K.J., 1994. The development and use of congeneric measurement models in school effectiveness research: improving the reliability and validity of composite and latent variables for fitting multilevel and structural equation models. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, 3-6 January. Melbourne, Australia.
32. Hubona, G.S. and Cheney, P.H., 1994. System effectiveness of knowledge-based technology: the relationship of user performance and attitudinal factors. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii, International Conference on System Sciences. Wailea, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press, Vol. 4, 532-541.
33. Hufnagel, E.M., 1990. User Satisfaction - are we really measuring system effectiveness? In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, IEEE Computer Society Press, Vol. 4, 437-446.
34. Hunton, J.E. and Beeler, J.D., 1997. Effects of user participation in systems development: a longitudinal field experiment. Mis Quarterly, 21, 359-388.
35. Ives, B. and Olson, M.H., 1984. User involvement and mis success: a review of research. Management Science, 30, 586-603.
36. Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., and Leitch, R.A., 1997. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use an information system. Decision Sciences, 28, 357-389.
37. Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D., 1993. Lisrel8: Structural Equation Modeling With The Simplis Command Language. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
38. Kline, R.B., 1998. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, The Guilford Press.
39. Klobas, J. and McGill, T., 2004. Spreadsheet knowledge: measuring what user developers know. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 427-436.
40. Kreie, J., 1998. On the improvement of end-user developed systems using systems analysis and design. University of Arkansas. Unpublished PhD.
41. Kreie, J., Cronan, T.P., Pendley, J., and Renwick, J.S., 2000. Applications development by end-users: can quality be improved? Decision Support Systems, 29, 143-152.
42. Kujala, S., 2003. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 1-16.
43. Landis, R.S., Beal, D.J., and Tesluk, P.E., 2000. A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 186-207.
44. Lawrence, M. and Low, G., 1993. Exploring individual user satisfaction within user-led development. Mis Quarterly, 17, 195-208.
45. Lin, W.T. and Shao, B.B.M., 2000. The relationship between user participation and system success: a simultaneous contingency approach. Information and Management, 37, 283-295.
46. Mahmood, M.A., Burn, J.M., Gemoets, L.A., and Jacquez, C., 2000. Variables affecting information technology end-user satisfaction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52, 751-771.
47. Markus, M.L. and Mao, J.-Y., 2004. Participation in development and implementation: updating an old, tired concept for today's is contexts. Journal of The Association for Information Systems, 5, 514-544.
48. McGill, T., 2002. An investigation of end user development success. Murdoch University. Unpublished PhD.
49. McGill, T., 2004. The effect of end user development on end user success. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 16, 41-58.
50. McGill, T. and Dixon, M.W., 2001. Spreadsheet knowledge: an exploratory study. In: Managing Information in a Global Economy: 2001 IRMA International Conference. Vancouver, Canada, Idea Group Publishing, 621-625.
51. McGill, T., Hobbs, V., and Klobas, J., 2003. User developed applications and information systems success: a test of delone and Mclean's model. Information Resources Management Journal, 16, 24-45.
52. McGill, T.J. and Klobas, J.E., 2005. The role of spreadsheet knowledge in user developed application success. Decision Support Systems, 39, 355-369.
53. Mckeen, J.D. and Guimaraes, T., 1997. Successful strategies for user participation in systems development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 133-150.
54. Mckeen, J.D., Guimaraes, T., and Wetherbe, J.C., 1994. The relationship between user participation and user satisfaction: an investigation of four contingency factors. Mis Quarterly, 18, 427-451.
55. Rai, A., Lang, S.S., and Welker, R.B., 2002. Assessing the validity of is success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13, 50-69.
56. Rivard, S., Poirier, G., Raymond, L., and Bergeron, F., 1997. Development of a measure to assess the quality of user-developed applications. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28, 44-58.
57. Roldán, J.L. and Lean, A., 2003. A validation test of an adaptation of the delone and McLean's model in the spanish eis field. Critical Reflections on Information Systems. A Systemic Approach. J.J. Cano Hershey, Pa, Idea Group Publishing, 66-84.
58. Ronen, B., Palley, M.A., and Lucas, H.C., 1989. Spreadsheet analysis and design. Communications of the Acm, 32, 84-93.
59. Salchenberger, L., 1993. Structured development techniques for user-developed systems. Information and Management, 24, 41-50.
60. Schumacker, R.E. and Lomax, R.G., 1996. A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Seddon, P. and Kiew, M.-Y., 1994. A partial test and development of delone and McLean's model of is success. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Vancouver Canada, Association for Information Systems, 99-110.
62. Seddon, P. and Kiew, M.-Y., 1996. A partial test and development of delone and Mclean's model of is success. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 4, 90-109.
63. Seddon, P. and Yip, S.K., 1992. An empirical evaluation of user information satisfaction (Uis) measures for use with general ledger accounting software. Journal of Information Systems, 6, 75-92.
64. Segars, A.H. and Grover, V., 1993. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. Mis Quarterly, 17, 517-525.
65. Shayo, C., Guthrie, R., and Igbaria, M., 1999. Exploring the measurement of end user computing success. Journal of End User Computing, 11, 5-14.
66. Torkzadeh, G. and Doll, W.J., 1999. The development of a tool for measuring the perceived impact of information technology on work. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 27, 327-339.
67. Torkzadeh, G. and Lee, J., 2003. Measures of perceived enduser computing skills. Information and Management, 40, 607-615.