Dynamic model of giant magnetostrictive actuator considering excess eddy current loss

Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao/Proceedings of the Chinese Society of Electrical Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 24, 2008, Pages 136-140

  Zhao, Zhang Rong ^a   Wu, Yi Jie ^a   Gu, Xin Jian ^a   Ge, Rong Jie ^a   Xu, Jun ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic model; Excess eddy current loss; Giant magetostrictive actuator; Terfenol D rod

Indexed keywords

EDDY CURRENTS; ELASTICITY; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; HYSTERESIS; MAGNETIC HYSTERESIS; MAGNETIC MATERIALS; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC MODEL; EXCESS EDDY CURRENT LOSS; GIANT MAGETOSTRICTIVE ACTUATOR; GIANT MAGNETOSTRICTIVE ACTUATOR; TERFENOL-D ROD;

MAGNETOSTRICTIVE DEVICES;

EID: 51649121328     PISSN: 02588013     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Venkataraman R. Modeling and adaptive control of magnetostrictive actuators [D]. USA: Maryland University, 1999.
2. Venkataraman R, Krishnaprasad P S. A model for a thin magnetostrictive actuator [C]. The 32nd Conference on Information Sciences And Systems, Princeton, NJ, Princeton, 1998.
3. Tan Xiaobo, Baras J S, Krishnaprasad P S. A dynamic model for magnetostrictive hysteresis [C]. The American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado, 2003.
4. Davino D, Natale C, Pirozzi S. Phenomenological dynamic model of a magnetostrictive actuator [J]. Physica B, 2004, 343(4): 112-116.
5. Tan X B, Baras J S. Modeling and control of hysteresis in magnetostrictive actuators [J]. Automatica, 2004, 40(9): 1469-1480.
6. Hu H, Mrad R B. A discrete-time compensation algorithm for hysteresis in piezoceramic actuators [J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2004, 18(1): 169-185.
7. Cavallo A, Natale C, Pirozzi S, et al. Effects of Hysteresis compensation in feedback control systems [J]. IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 2003, 39(3): 1389-1392.
8. Cavallo A, Natale C, Pirozzi S, et al. feedback control systems for micropositioning tasks with Hysteresis compensation [J]. IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 2004, 40(2): 876-879.
9. Huang Wenmei, Wang Bowen, Chao Shuying, et al. Dynamic model of giant magnetostrictive transducer considering eddy current effects and veriational stress [J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2005, 25(16): 132-136(in Chinese).
10. Jiles D C. Modeling the effects of eddy current losses on frequency dependent hysteresis in electrically conducting media [J]. IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 1994, 30(6): 4326-4328.
11. Bergqvist A, Engdahl G. A model for magnetomechanical hysteresis and losses in magnetostrictive materials [J]. J. Appl. Phys, 1996, 79(8): 6476-6479.
12. Bergqvist A, Engdahl G. A phenomenological magnetomechanical hysteresis model [J]. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 75 (10): 5496-5498.
13. Wei Zhongguo, Engdahl G, Sillesjo F. Simulations of magnetostrictive actuators for ultrasonic applications [C]. SPIE in mart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 2000.
14. Bergqvist A. Magnetic vector hysteresis model with dry friction-like pinning [J]. Physica B. 1997, 233(4): 342-347.
15. Engdahl G, Bergqvist A. Loss simulations in magnetostrictive actuators [J]. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79(8): 4689-4691.
16. Bertotti G. Physical interpretation of eddy current losses in ferromagnetic materials. I. Theoretical considerations [J]. J. Appl. Phys, 1985, 57(6): 2110-2117.
17. Fiorillo F, Novikov A. Power losses under sinusoidal, trapezoidal and distorted induction waveform [J]. IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 1990, 26(5): 2559-2561.
18. Tiberg H, Bergqvis A t, Engdahal G. Evaluation of a magnetostrictive drive element model [J]. J. Appl. Phys. 1993, 73(10): 5851-5853.
19. Tiberg H, Bergqvist A, Kvarnsjo L, et al. A method of computing electro-mechanical transfer function for magnetostrictive function units [J]. IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 1992, 28(5): 2808-22810.
20. Kvarnsjo L, A bergqvist nonlinear 2-D transient modeling of terfenol-D rods [J]. IEEE Trans. on Magnetics, 1990, 27(6): 5349-5351.