Computer-based documentation: Effects on parent- provider communication during pediatric health maintenance encounters

Pediatrics

Volumn 122, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 590-598

  Johnson, Kevin B ^a,b   Serwint, Janet R ^c   Fagan, Lawrence A ^c   Thompson, Richard E ^d   Wilson, Modena E H ^c,d   Roter, Debra ^e  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer based documentation; Electronic health records; Medical charts; Patient physician interaction; Pediatrics; Structured reporting systems

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NEWBORN; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PARENT; PARENT COUNSELING; PARENT PROVIDER COMMUNICATION; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PEDIATRICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; ETHICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMMUNICATION; DOCUMENTATION; FEMALE; HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;

EID: 51649112215     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-3005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Shiffman RN, Freudigman M, Brandt CA, Liaw Y, Navedo DD. A guideline implementation system using handheld computers for office management of asthma: effects on adherence and patient outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000;105(4):767-773
2. Karliczek GF, de Geus AF, Wiersma G, Oosterhaven S, Jenkins
3. Carola, a computer system for automatic documentation in anesthesia. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1987;4(4):211-221
4. Yarnall KS, Rimer BK, Hynes D, et al. Computerized prompts for cancer screening in a community health center. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1998;11(2):96-104
5. Zenni EA, Robinson TN. Effects of structured encounter forms on pediatric house staff knowledge, parent satisfaction, and quality of care: a randomized, controlled trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150(9):975-980
6. Grams RR, Morgan G. Medical chart innovations that can improve physician productivity. J Med Syst. 1999;23(2): 133-144
7. Gilbert JA. Physician data entry: providing options is essential. Health Data Manag. 1998;6(9):84-92
8. Symes DR. Physician data entry is the solution. Health Manag Technol. 1999;20(4):34-37
9. Harris RP, O'Malley MS, Fletcher SW, Knight BP. Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. Am J Prev Med. 1990;6(3): 145-152
10. Frame PS, Zimmer JG, Werth PL, Hall WJ, Eberly SW. Computer-based vs manual health maintenance tracking: a controlled trial. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(7):581-588
11. Johannes RS, Carr-Locke DL. The role of automated speech recognition in endoscopic data collection. Endoscopy. 1992; 24(suppl 2):493-498
12. Madlon-Kay DJ. Use of a structured encounter form to improve well-child care documentation. Arch Fam Med. 1998; 7(5):480-483
13. Shiffman RN, Liaw Y, Navedo DD, Freudigman KA. User satisfaction and frustration with a handheld, pen-based guideline implementation system for asthma. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999: 940 -944
14. Eichelberger D. What works: Web-based exam encounter forms save time, improve documentation. Health Manag Technol. 1998;19(4):36
15. Duggan AK, Starfield B, DeAngelis C. Structured encounter form: the impact on provider performance and recording of well-child care. Pediatrics. 1990;85(1):104 -113
16. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Dichotomy between physicians' and patients' attitudes regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:275-279
17. Gadd CS, Penrod LE. Assessing physician attitudes regarding use of an outpatient EMR: a longitudinal, multi-practice study. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:194-198
18. Greatbatch D, Heath C, Campion P, Luff P. How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interaction? Fam Pract. 1995;12(1):32-36
19. Warshawsky SS, Pliskin JS, Urkin J, et al. Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994;43(3-4):269 -273
20. Als AB. The desk-top computer as a magic box: patterns of behaviour connected with the desk-top computer: GPs' and patients' perceptions. Fam Pract. 1997;14(1):17-23
21. Margalit RS, Roter D, Dunevant MA, Larson S, Reis S. Electronic medical record use and physician-patient communication: an observational study of Israeli primary care encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(1):134-141
22. Johnson KB, Cowan J. ClicTate: a computer-based documentation tool for guideline-based care. J Med Syst. 2002;26(1): 47-60
23. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. Recommendations for preventive pedi-atric health care. Pediatrics. 1995;96(2):373-374
24. Johnson KB, Serwint JR, Fagan LM, Thompson RE, Wilson MH. Computer-based documentation: effect on parent and physician satisfaction during a pediatric health maintenance encounter. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(3):250-254
25. Gielen AC, Wilson ME, McDonald EM, et al. Randomized trial of enhanced anticipatory guidance for injury prevention. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(1):42-49
26. Wissow LS, Roter D, Bauman LJ, et al. Patient-provider communication during the emergency department care of children with asthma. Med Care. 1998;36(10):1439-1450
27. Bales RF. Interaction Process Analysis: A Method for the Study of Small Groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press; 1950
28. Roter DL, Larson S. The relationship between residents' and attending physicians' communication during primary care visits: an illustrative use of the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Health Commun. 2001;13(1):33-48
29. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51(7):1087-1110
30. Ford S, Fallowfield L, Lewis S. Doctor-patient interactions in oncology. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42(11):1511-1519
31. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin M Jr, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277(4):350 -356
32. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):907-915
33. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288(6): 756 -764
34. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW, Yang S, Yale JF. Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000; 7(6):569 -585
35. Rouf E, Whittle J, Lu N, Schwartz MD. Computers in the exam room: differences in physician-patient interaction may be due to physician experience. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(1):43-48
36. Fielstein EM, Brown SH, McBrine CS, Clark TK, Hardenbrook SP, Speroff T. The effect of standardized, computer-guided templates on quality of VA disability exams. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:249-253
37. Frankel R, Altschuler A, George S, et al. Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication: a longitudinal qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(8):677-682
38. Goldstein J. Treat the patient: not the computer. Wall Street Journal. September 10, 2007. Available at http://blogs.wsj.com/health/2007/ 09/10/treat-the-patient-not-the-computer/trackback/. Accessed July 8, 2008