The ethics of socio-cultural risk research

Health, Risk and Society

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 321-329

  Pidgeon, Nick ^a   Simmons, Peter ^b   Sarre, Sophie ^c   Henwood, Karen ^d   Smith, Noel ^e  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Ethics; Socio cultural risk research

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDITORIAL; EPISTEMOLOGY; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL ETHICS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL CLASS;

EID: 51649110171     PISSN: 13698575     EISSN: 14698331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13698570802334526     Document Type: Editorial

References (21)

1. BSA (2004) Statement of Ethical Practice for the British Sociological Association.
2. Corden, A. and Sainsbury, R. (2005) Verbatim quotations: Whose views count. The qualitative researcher, 1, pp. 4-6.
3. Cox, P., Niewohner, J., Pidgeon, N., Gerrard, S., Fischhoff, B. and Riley, D. (2003) The use of mental models in chemical risk protection: developing a generic workplace methodology. Risk analysis, 23, pp. 311-324.
4. Economic and Social Research Council (2005) Research Ethics Framework, Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon
5. Fischhoff, B. (1990) Psychology and public policy: Tool or toolmaker?. American psychologist, 45, pp. 647-653.
6. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Cambridge
7. Graham, J., Grewal, I. and Lewis, J. (2007) Ethics in Social Research: The Views of Research Participants, Government Research Unit, HM Treasury, London
8. Hallowell, N. (2006) Varieties of suffering: Living with the risk of ovarian cancer. Health, risk and society, 8:1, pp. 9-26.
9. Henwood, K. L., Pidgeon, N. F., Sarre, S., Simmons, P. and Smith, N. Risk, framing and everyday life: Epistemological and methodological reflections from three socio-cultural projects. Health, Risk and Society
10. Irwin, A., Simmons, P. and Walker, G. (1999) Faulty environments and risk reasoning: The local understanding of industrial hazards. Environment and planning A, 31, pp. 1311-1326.
11. Janis, I. L. and Mann, L. (1977) Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice and Commitment, Free Press, New York
12. Langford, I. H. (2002) An existential approach to risk perception. Risk analysis, 22, pp. 101-120.
13. Lewis, J., Datta, J. and Sarre, S. (1999) Individualism and Commitment in Marriage and Cohabitation Research Series no.8/99, Lord Chancellor's Department, London
14. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park
15. Murphy, E. and Dingwall, R. (2003) Qualitative Methods in Health Policy Research, Sage, London
16. Pidgeon, N. F. and Gregory, R. (2004) Judgment, decision making and public policy. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, pp. 604-623. Blackwell, Oxford
17. Poortinga, W. and Pidgeon, N. F. (2003) Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk analysis, 23, pp. 961-972.
18. Social Research Association (2003) Ethical Guidelines
19. Rosa, E. A. (2003) The logical structure of the social amplification of risk framework (SARF): Metatheoretical foundations and policy implications. The Social Amplification of Risk, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Sharf, B. F. (1999) Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the internet. Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net, pp. 243-256. Sage, Thousand Oaks
21. Zonabend, F. (1993) The Nuclear Peninsula, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge