On-line contextual influences during reading normal text: A multiple-regression analysis

Vision Research

Volumn 48, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 2172-2183

  Pynte, Joel ^a   New, Boris ^a   Kennedy, Alan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context effects; Eye movements; Latent Semantic Analysis; Predictability; Reading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMBEDDING; EYE EXAMINATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING;

EYE MOVEMENTS; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; READING; SEMANTICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 51649109572     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abeillé A., Clément L., and Kinyon A. Building a French treebank. In: Abeillé A. (Ed). Treebanks: building and using parsed corpora (2003), Kluwer, Dordrecht 165-188
2. Altarriba J., Kambe G., Pollatsek A., and Rayner K. Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish English bilinguals. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 875-890
3. Altarriba J., Kroll J., Sholl A., and Rayner K. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition 24 (1996) 477-492
4. Ashby J., Rayner K., and Clifton C. Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers: Differential effects of frequency and predictability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A (2005) 1065
5. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics (2007), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
6. Balota D.A., Pollatsek A., and Rayner K. The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology 17 (1985) 364-390
7. Bates, D., & Sarkar, D. (2006). lme4: Linear mixed-effect models using S4 classes. R package version 0.995-2.
8. Berry M.W. Large scale singular value computations. International Journal of Supercomputer Applications 6 (1992) 13-49
9. Binder K., and Rayner K. Contextual strength does not modulate the subordinate bias effect: Evidence from eye fixations and self-paced reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 271-276
10. Calvo M.G., and Meseguer E. Eye movements and processing stages in reading: Relative contribution of visual, lexical and contextual factors. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 5 (2002) 66-77
11. Camblin C., Gordon P.C., and Swaab T. The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 56 (2007) 103-128
12. Collins A.M., and Loftus E.F. A spreading activation theory of semantic priming. Psychological Review 82 (1975) 407-428
13. R Development Core Team. (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (version 2.3.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
14. Drieghe D., Brysbaert M., Desmet T., and De Baecke C. Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16 (2004) 79-103
15. Ehrlich S.F., and Rayner K. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20 (1981) 641-655
16. Frazier L., and Rayner K. Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the study of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14 (1982) 178-210
17. Frisson S., Rayner K., and Pickering M.J. Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 862-877
18. Henderson J.M., and Ferreira F. Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16 (1990) 417-429
19. Henderson J.M., and Ferreira F. Eye movement control during reading: Fixation measures foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (1993) 201-221
20. Hirotani M., Frazier L., and Rayner K. Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2006) 425-443
21. Inhoff A.W. Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading or prose. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 23 (1984) 612-624
22. Inhoff A.W., and Rayner K. Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 40 (1986) 431-439
23. Kennedy A. Parafoveal processing in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53A (2000) 429-455
24. Kennedy, A., Hill, R., & Pynte, J. (2003). The Dundee corpus. Poster presented at ECEM12: 12th European conference on eye movements. Dundee, August 2003.
25. Kennedy A., and Pynte J. Parafoveal-on foveal effects in normal reading. Vision Research 45 (2005) 153-168
26. Kennedy A., Pynte J., and Ducrot S. Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A 4 (2002) 1307-1337
27. Kennison S.M., and Clifton C. Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21 (1995) 68-81
28. Kliegl R., Grabner E., Rolfs M., and Engbert R. Length, frequency and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16 (2004) 262-284
29. Kliegl R. Towards a perceptual-span theory of distributed processing in reading: A reply to Rayner, Pollatsek, Drieghe, Slattery, & Reichle (2007). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138 (2007) 530-537
30. Kliegl R., Nuthmann A., and Engbert R. Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (2006) 12-35
31. Landauer T.K. On the computational basis of learning and cognition: Arguments from LSA. Psychological. Learning and Motivation 41 (2002) 43-84
32. Landauer T.K., and Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104 (1997) 211-240
33. Landauer T.K., Foltz P.W., and Laham D. An introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes 25 (1998) 259-284
34. Lavigne F., Vitu F., and d'Ydewalle G. The influence of semantic context on initial landing sites in words. Acta Psychologica 104 (2000) 191-214
35. Loftus G.R., and Masson M.E.J. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1 (1994) 476-490
36. McConkie G.W., Kerr P.W., Reddix M.D., and Zola D. Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations on words. Vision Research 28 (1988) 1107-1118
37. McDonald S.A. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades. Vision Research 45 (2005) 1829-1834
38. McDonald S.A., and Shillcock R.C. Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Sciences 14 (2003) 648-652
39. McDonald S.A., and Shillcock R.C. Low-level predictive inference in reading: The influence of transitional probabilities on eye movements. Vision Research 43 (2003) 1735-1751
40. Meyer D.E., and Schvaneveldt R.W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1971) 227-234
41. Morris R.K., and Folk J.R. Focus as a contextual priming mechanism in reading. Memory & Cognition 26 (1998) 1313-1322
42. New B., Brysbaert M., Veronis J., and Pallier C. The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics 28 (2007) 661-677
43. O'Regan K., Pynte J., and Coëffé C. Comment le regard explore un mot isolé. Bulletin de Psychologie 39 (1986) 7-10
44. Pollatsek A., Reichle E.D., and Rayner K. Tests of the E-Z reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology 52 (2006) 1-56
45. Pynte J., and Kennedy A. An influence over eye movements in reading exerted from beyond the level of the word: Evidence from reading English and French. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3786-3801
46. Pynte J., and Kennedy A. The influence of punctuation and word class on distributed processing in normal reading. Vision Research 47 (2007) 1215-1227
47. Pynte J., Kennedy A., and Ducrot S. The influence of parafoveal typographical errors on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 16 (2004) 178-202
48. Radach R., and Heller D. Relation between spatial and temporal aspects of eye movement control. In: Kennedy A., Radach R., Heller D., and Pynte J. (Eds). Reading as a perceptual process (2000), Elsevier, Oxford 165-192
49. Raney G.E., and Rayner K. Word frequency effects during two readings of a text. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (1995) 151-172
50. Rayner K. Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes. Memory and Cognition 4 (1977) 443-448
51. Rayner K., Ashby J., Pollatsek A., and Reichle E.D. The effect of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 720-732
52. Rayner K., and Duffy S.A. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory and Cognition 14 (1986) 191-201
53. Rayner K., and Fischer M.H. Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception and Psychophysics 58 (1996) 734-747
54. Rayner K., Fischer M.H., and Pollatsek A. Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vision Research 38 (1998) 1129-1144
55. Rayner K., Sereno S.C., and Raney G.E. Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 5 (1996) 1188-1200
56. Rayner K., and Well A.D. Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3 (1996) 504-509
57. Reichle E.D., Pollatsek A., Fisher D.L., and Rayner K. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 125-157
58. Reichle E.D., Rayner K., and Pollatsek A. The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2003) 445-476
59. Schuberth R.E., and Eimas P.D. Effect of context on the classification of words and non-words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 27-36
60. Stanovich K.E., and West R.F. The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 658-672
61. Taylor W.L. Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 30 (1953) 415-433
62. Traxler M.J., Foss D.J., Seely R.E., Kaup B., and Morris R.K. Priming in sentence processing: Intralexical spreading activation, schdmas, and situation models. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29 (2000) 581-595
63. Vitu F., McConkie G.W., Kerr P., and O'Regan J.K. Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3513-3533