Statistical assessment of analytical method transfer

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 1005-1012

  Zhong, Jinglin ^a   Lee, Kathy ^a   Tsong, Yi ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical method transfer; Concordance correlation coefficient; Double one sided test; Tolerance interval

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DRUG MANUFACTURE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HYPOTHESIS; LABORATORY; METHOD TRANSFER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; LABORATORIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 51649109411     PISSN: 10543406     EISSN: 15205711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10543400802287347     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Altman, X., Bland, X. (1983). Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies. Statisticians 32:307-317.
2. Bland, X., Altman, X. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307-310.
3. Bland, X., Altman, X. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 8:137-160.
4. Faulkenberry, X., Daley, X. (1970). Sample size for tolerance limits on a normal distribution. Technometrics 12(4):813-821.
5. Fromke, C., Hothorn, L., Onken, J., Sczesny, F. (2006, September 26-28) Biostatistical aspects of transferring an analytical method to a second pharmaceutical laboratory. Presentation at Non-Clinical Statistics Conference, Potsdam, Germany.
6. Johnson, N., Kotz, X., Balakrishnan, X. (1995). Continuous Univariate Distributions. Vol. 2, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
7. Lin, L. (1989). A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45:255-268.
8. Lin, L. (1992). Assay validation using the concordance correlation coefficient. Biometrics 48:599-604.
9. Lin, L. (2000). Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. Stat. Med. 19:255-270.
10. Lin, L., Hedayat, S., Sinha, X., Yang, X. (2002). Statistical methods in assessing agreement: Models, issues, and tools. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 97(457):257-270.
11. Schuirmann, D. (1987). A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J. Pharmacokinetic Biopharmaceutics 15:657-680.
12. Shao, J., Zhong, B. (2004). Assessing the agreement between two quantitative assays with repeated measurements. J. Biopharm. Stat. 14:1:201-212.
13. Tsong, Y., Shen, M. (2007a). Parametric two-stage sequential quality assurance test of dose content uniformity. J. Biopharm. Stat. 17:143-157.
14. Tsong, Y., Shen, M. (2007b). An alternative approach to assess exchangeability of a test treatment and the standard treatment with normally distributed response. J. Biopharm. Stat. 17:329-338.
15. Tsong, Y., Shen, M., Shah, V. J. (2004). Three-stage sequential statistical dissolution testing rules. J. Biopharm. Stat. 14:757-779.
16. Wald, A., Wolfowitz, X. (1946). Tolerance limits for a normal distribution. Ann. Math. Stat. 19:208-215.
17. Zhong, B., Shao, J. (2003). Evaluating the agreement of two quantitative assays with repeated measurements. J. Biopharm. Stat. 13:75-86.