Origin of small understory beech in New York northern hardwood stands

Northern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 161-163

  Nyland, Ralph D ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Beech; Beech regeneration; Understory beech

Indexed keywords

HARDWOODS;

BEECH; BEECH REGENERATION; GENETIC MAKE-UP; NORTHERN HARDWOODS; SEED PRODUCTION; SEEDLING REGENERATION; SEEDLING SURVIVAL; UNDERSTORY BEECH;

SEED;

FAGUS;

EID: 51649106649     PISSN: 07426348     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/25.3.161     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. HELD, M.E. 1980. An analysis of factors related to sprouting and seeding in the occurrence of Fagus grandifolia in the eastern deciduous forest of North America. PhD dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, OH. 112 p.
2. HELD, M.E. 1983. Pattern of beech regeneration in the east-central United States. Bull Torrey Bot. Club 110:55-62.
3. HOUSTON, D.R. 1975. Beech bark disease: The aftermath forests are structures for a new outbreak. J. For. 73:660-663.
4. HOUSTON, D.R. 2001. Effect of harvesting regime on beech root sprouts and seedlings in a north-central Maine forest long affected by beech bark disease. US For. Serv. Res. Pap. NE-717. 20 p.
5. HOUSTON, D.R. 2005. Beech bark disease: 1934 to 2004: What's new since Ehrlich? P. 2-7 in Beech bark disease: Proc. of the Beech bark disease symp., Evans, C.A., J.A. Lucus, and M.J. Twery (eds.). US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-331.
6. HOULE, G. 1994. Spatiotemporal patterns in the components of regeneration of four sympatric tree species-Acer rubrum, Acer saccharum, Betula alleghaniensis, and Fagusgrandifolia. J. Ecol. 82(1):39-53.
7. JONES, R.H., AND D.J. RAYNAL. 1988. Root sprouting in American beech (Fagus grandifolia): Effects of root injury, root exposure, and season. For. Ecol. Manag. 25(2):79-90.
8. KOCH, J.L., AND D.W. CAREY. 2005. The genetics of resistance of American beech to beech bark disease: Knowledge through 2004. P. 98-105 in Beech bark disease: Proc. of the Beech bark disease symp., Evans, CA., J.A. Lucus, and M.J. Twery (eds.). US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-331.
9. LOGAN, K.T. 1973. Growth of tree seedlings as affected by light intensity: V. White ash, beech, eastern hemlock, and general conclusions. Department of Environment, Can. For. Serv., Publ. 1323. 11 p.
10. NYLAND, R.D., A.L. BASHANT, K.K. BOHN, AND J.M. VEROSTEK. 2006. Interference to hardwood regeneration in northeastern North America: Ecological characteristics of American beech, striped maple, and hobblebush. North. J. Appl. For. 23(1):53-61.
11. RAMIREZ, M., J. LOO, AND M.J. KRASOWSKI. 2007. Evaluation of resistance to the beech scale insect (Cryptococcus fagisuga) and propagation of American beech (Fagus grandifolia) by grafting. Silvae Genet. 6 5 (3-4): 163-169.
12. STALTER, R. 1982. Production of viable seed by American beech (Fagus grandifolia). Bull. TorreyBot. Club 109(4):542-544.
13. TUBBS, C.H., AND D.R. HOUSTON. 1990. Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. American beech. P. 325-332 in Silvios of North America, Vol. 2. Hardwoods. US For. Serv. Agric. Handb. No. 654.
14. US FOREST SERVICE. 2005. Beech bark disease: Proc. of the Beech bark disease symp, Evans, C.A., J.A. Lucus, and M.J. Twery (eds.). US For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-331. 149 p.
15. WARD, R.T. 1961. Some aspects of the regeneration habits of the American beech. Ecology 42(4):828-832.