Differential antennal sensitivities of the generalist butterflies Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis to host plant and non-host plant extracts

Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 84-88

  Mercader, R J ^a   Stelinski, L L ^b   Scriber, J M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Electroantennogram; Host selection; Olfaction; Oviposition

Indexed keywords

ANTENNA; BUTTERFLY; DECISION MAKING; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; HOST PLANT; HOST SELECTION; OLFACTION; OVIPOSITION;

HEXAPODA; LINDERA; LINDERA BENZOIN; LIRIODENDRON; LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA; MAGNOLIACEAE; PAPILIO GLAUCUS; PAPILIONIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA; POPULUS TREMULOIDES; PTELEA TRIFOLIATA; SALICACEAE; SALIX; SASSAFRAS; SASSAFRAS ALBIDUM;

EID: 51649103094     PISSN: 00240966     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. BAUR, R. & P. FEENY. 1995. Comparative electrophysiological analysis of plant odor perception in females of three Papilio species. Chemoecology 5/6: 26-36.
2. BERENBAUM, M. R. 1981. An oviposition "mistake" by Papilio glaucus (Papilionidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 35:75.
3. BERNAYS, E. A. 2001. Neural limitations in phytophagous insects: Implications for diet breadth and evolution of host affiliation. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 46: 703-727.
4. BOSSART, J. L. & J. M. SCRIBER. 1995. Maintenance of ecologically significant genetic variation in the tiger swallowtail butterfly through differential selection and gene flow. Evolution 49: 1163-1171.
5. BROWER, L. P. 1958. Larval foodplant specificity in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group. Lepid. News 12: 103-114.
6. BROWER, L. P. 1959. Speciation in butterflies of the Papilio glaucus group. II. Ecological relationships and interspecific sexual behavior. Evolution 13: 212-228.
7. CHEW, F. S. 1977. Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential food-plants. Evolution 31: 568-579.
8. DEERING, M. D. & J. M. SCRIBER. 2002. Field bioassays show heterospecific mating preference asymmetry between hybridizing North American Papilio butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J. Ethol. 20: 25-33.
9. DICKE, M. 2000. Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: a multitrophic perspective. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 28: 601-617.
10. FEENY, P., E. STADLER, I. AHMAN, & M. CARTER. 1989. Effects of plant odor on oviposition by the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). J. Insect Behav. 2: 803-827.
11. FINCH, S. & R. H. COLLIER. 2000. Host-plant selection by insects - a theory based on'appropriate/inappropriate landings' by pest insects of cruciferous plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96: 91-102.
12. GÖKQE, A. L., L. L. STELINSKI & M. E. WHALON. 2005. Behavioral and electrophysiological responses of leafroller moths to selected plant extracts. Environ. Entomol. 34: 1426-1432.
13. GRAVES, S. D. & A. M. SHAPIRO. 2003. Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna. Biol. Conserv. 110: 413-433.
14. GROSSMUELLER, D. W. & R. C. LEDERHOUSE. 1985. Oviposition site selection - An aid to rapid growth and development in the tiger swallowtail butterfly, Papilio glaucus. Oecologia 66: 68-73.
15. HAGEN, R. H., R. C. LEDERHOUSE, J. L. BOSSART & J. M. SCBIBER. 1991. Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis are distinct species. J. Lepid. Soc. 45: 245-258.
16. HANSSON, B. S. 1995. Olfaction in Lepidoptera. Experientia 51: 1003-1027.
17. HONDA, K. 1995. Chemical basis of differential oviposition by lepidopterous insects. Arch. Insect. Biochem. 30: 1-23.
18. JANZ, N. 2003. The cost of polyphagy: oviposition decision time vs. error rate in a butterfly. Oikos 100: 493-496.
19. KROUTOV, V., M. S. MAYER & T. C. EMMEL. 1999. Olfactory conditioning of the butterfly Agraulis vanillae (L.) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) to floral but not host-plant odors. J. Insect Behav. 12: 833-843.
20. LARSSON, S. & B. EKBOM. 1995. Oviposition mistakes in herbivorous insects - Confusion or a step towards a new host giant. Oikos 72: 155-160.
21. LEDERHOUSE, R. C., M. P. AYRES, J. K. NITAO & J. M. SCRIBER. 1992. Differential use of Lauraceous hosts by swallowtail butterflies, Papilio troilus and P. palamedes (Papilionidae). Oikos 63: 244-252.
22. LEVINS, R. & R. MACARTHUR. 1969. An hypothesis to explain the incidence of monophagy. Ecology 50: 910-911.
23. Mayhew, P. J. 1997. Adaptive patterns of host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. Oikos 79: 417-428.
24. MERCADER, R. J. & J. M. SCRIBER. 2005. Phenotypic plasticity of host selection in adult tiger swallowtails; Papilio glaucus (L.), pp. 25-57. In Ananthakrishnan, T . N. & D. Whitman (eds.), Insects and phenotypic plasticity. Science Publishers, Enfield.
25. MERCADER, R. J. 2007. Diversification of host use in two polyphagous butterflies: differences in oviposition specificity or host rank hierarchy? Entomol Exp. Appl. 125: 89-101.
26. RAUSHER, M. D. 1978. Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly. Science 200: 1071-1073.
27. RENWICK, J. A. A. 2002. The chemical world of crucivores: lures, treats and traps. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104: 35-42.
28. RENWICK, J. A. A. & F S. Chew. 1994. Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 39: 377-400.
29. SAS INSTITUTE. 2000. SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 6, 4th ed., vol. 1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
30. SCHERER, C. & G. KOLB. 1987. Behavioral experiments on the visual processing of color stimuli in Pieris brassicae L. (Lepidoptera). J. Comp. Physiol. A 160: 645-656.
31. SCHOONHOVEN, L. M., T. JERMY & J. A. VANLOON. 1998. Insect-plant biology: from physiology to evolution. New York: Chapman & Hall.
32. SCRIBER, J. M. 1993. Absence of behavioral induction in oviposition preference of Papilio glaucus (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae). Great Lakes Entomol. 26: 81-95.
33. SCRIBER, J. M. 1998. Inheritance of diagnostic larval traits for interspecific hybrids of Papilio canadensis and P. glaucus (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Great Lakes Entomol. 31: 113-123.
34. SCRIBER, J. M., B. L. Giebink & D. Snider. 1991. Reciprocal latitudinal clines in oviposition behavior of Papilio glaucus and P. canadensis across the Great Lakes hybrid zone: possible sex-linkage of oviposition preferences. Oecologia 87: 360-368.
35. STANTON, M. L. 1982. Searching in a patchy environment - foodplant selection by Colias eriphyle butterflies. Ecology 63: 839-853.
36. STELINSKI, L. L., J. R. MILLER & L. J. CUT. 2003. Presence of long-lasting peripheral adaptation in the obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana and absence of such adaptation in the redbanded leafroller, Argyrotaenia velutinana. J. Chem. Ecol. 29: 405-856.
37. STRAATMAAN, R. 1962. Notes on certain Lepidoptera ovipositing on plants which are toxic to their larvae. J. Lepid. Soc. 16: 99-103.
38. THOMPSON, J. N. & O. PELLMYR. 1991. Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 36: 65-89.
39. VANLOON, J. J. A., W. H. FRENTY & F. A. VANEEUWIJK. 1992. Electroantennogram responses to plant volatiles in two species of Pieris butterflies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 62: 253-260.
40. WEISS, M. R. 1997. Innate colour preferences and flexible colour learning in the pipevine swallowtail. Anim. Behav. 53: 1043-1052.
41. WIKLUND, C. 1975. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range in Papilio machaon L. Oecologia 18: 185-197.