Response to “Competing Views: A Dialogue on Response to Intervention”

Assessment for Effective Intervention

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 62-64

  Scruggs, Thomas E ^a   Mastropieri, Margo A ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549106204     PISSN: 15345084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/15345084060320010901     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Dawes, R.M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P.E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668—1674.
2. Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P.L., & Young, C.L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 157—171.
3. Hallahan, D.P., Keller, C.E., & Ball, D.W. (1986). A comparison of prevalence rate variability from state to state for each of the categories of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 8—14.
4. Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 525—531.
5. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002).
6. Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (2002). On babies and bathwater: Addressing the problems of identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 25, 155—168.
7. VanDerHeyden, A.M., Witt, J.C., & Barnett, D.A. (2005). The emergence and possible futures of response to intervention. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 23, 339—361.