Bias between the left and right inverted repeats during IS911 targeted insertion

Journal of Bacteriology

Volumn 190, Issue 18, 2008, Pages 6111-6118

  Rousseau, P ^a   Loot, C ^a,b   Turlan, C ^a   Nolivos, S ^a   Chandler, M ^a  

^a UPS   (France)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOPROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; TRANSPOSASE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA PROTEIN COMPLEX; DNA TRANSPOSITION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE INSERTION; GENE INSERTION SEQUENCE; IN VIVO STUDY; INVERTED REPEAT; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; OPEN READING FRAME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BASE SEQUENCE; BINDING SITES; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; DNA, BACTERIAL; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MUTAGENESIS, INSERTIONAL; OPEN READING FRAMES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, NUCLEIC ACID; TRANSPOSASES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 51549102000     PISSN: 00219193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00452-08     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Auge-Gouillou, C., M. H. Hamelin, M. V. Demattei, G. Periquet, and Y. Bigot. 2001. The ITR binding domain of the Mariner Mos-1 transposase. Mol. Genet. Genomics 265:58-65.
2. Auge-Gouillou, C., M. H. Hamelin, M. V. Demattei, M. Periquet, and Y. Bigot. 2001. The wild-type conformation of the Mos-1 inverted terminal repeats is suboptimal for transposition in bacteria. Mol. Genet. Genomics 265:51-57.
3. Chalmers, R., A. Guhathakurta, H. Benjamin, and N. Kleckner. 1998. IHF modulation of Tn10 transposition: sensory transduction of supercoiling status via a proposed protein/DNA molecular spring. Cell 93:897-908.
4. Crellin, P., S. Sewitz, and R. Chalmers. 2004. DNA looping and catalysis; the IHF-folded arm of Tn10 promotes conformational changes and hairpin resolution. Mol. Cell 13:537-547.
5. Curcio, M. J., and K. M. Derbyshire. 2003. The outs and ins of transposition: from mu to kangaroo. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4:865-877.
6. DeBoy, R. T., and N. L. Craig. 2000. Target site selection by Tn7: attTn7 transcription and target activity. J. Bacteriol. 182:3310-3313.
7. Dodson, K. W., and D. E. Berg. 1989. Factors affecting transposition activity of IS50 and Tn5 ends. Gene 76:207-213.
8. Duval-Valentin, G., B. Marty-Cointin, and M. Chandler. 2004. Requirement of IS911 replication before integration defines a new bacterial transposition pathway. EMBO J. 23:3897-3906.
9. Duval-Valentin, G., C. Normand, V. Khemici, B. Marty, and M. Chandler. 2001. Transient promoter formation: a new feedback mechanism for regulation of IS911 transposition. EMBO J. 20:5802-5811.
10. Gueguen, E., P. Rousseau, G. Duval-Valentin, and M. Chandler. 2005. The transpososome: control of transposition at the level of catalysis. Trends Microbiol. 13:543-549.
11. Haren, L., C. Normand, P. Polard, R. Alazard, and M. Chandler. 2000. IS911 transposition is regulated by protein-protein interactions via a leucine zipper motif. J. Mol. Biol. 296:757-768.
12. Haren, L., P. Polard, B. Ton-Hoang, and M. Chandler. 1998. Multiple oligomerisation domains in the IS911 transposase: a leucine zipper motif is essential for activity. J. Mol. Biol. 283:29-41.
13. Kiss, J., Z. Nagy, G. Toth, G. B. Kiss, J. Jakab, M. Chandler, and F. Olasz. 2007. Transposition and target specificity of the typical IS30 family clement IS1655 from Neisseria meningitidis. Mol. Microbiol. 63:1731-1747.
14. Loot, C., C. Turlan, and M. Chandler. 2004. Host processing of branched DNA intermediates is involved in targeted transposition of IS911. Mol. Microbiol. 51:385-393.
15. Loot, C., C. Turlan, P. Rousseau, B. Ton-Hoang, and M. Chandler. 2002. A target specificity switch in IS911 transposition: the role of the OrfA protein. EMBO J. 21:4172-4182.
16. Nagy, Z., and M. Chandler. 2004. Regulation of transposition in bacteria. Res. Microbiol. 155:387-398.
17. Nagy, Z., M. Szabo, M. Chandler, and F. Olasz. 2004. Analysis of the N-terminal DNA binding domain of the IS30 transposase. Mol. Microbiol. 54:478-488.
18. Normand, C., G. Duval-Valentin, L. Haren, and M. Chandler. 2001. The terminal inverted repeats of IS911: requirements for synaptic complex assembly and activity. J. Mol. Biol. 308:853-871.
19. Pathania, S., M. Jayaram, and R. M. Harshey. 2003. A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition. EMBO J. 22:3725-3736.
20. Polard, P., and M. Chandler. 1995. An in vivo transposase- catalyzed single-stranded DNA circularization reaction. Genes Dev. 9:2846-2858.
21. Polard, P., B. Ton-Hoang, L. Haren, M. Betermier, R. Walczak, and M. Chandler. 1996. IS911-mediated transpositional recombination in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 264:68-81.
22. Rousseau, P., E. Gueguen, G. Duval-Valentin, and M. Chandler. 2004. The helix-turn-helix motif of bacterial insertion sequence IS911 transposase is required for DNA binding. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1335-1344.
23. Rousseau, P., C. Loot, C. Guynet, Y. Ah-Seng, B. Ton-Hoang, and M. Chandler. 2007. Control of IS911 target selection: how OrfA may ensure IS dispersion. Mol. Microbiol. 63:1701-1709.
24. Rousseau, P., C. Normand, C. Loot, C. Turlan, R. Alazard, G. Duval-Valentin, and M. Chandler. 2002. Transposition of IS911, p. 367-383. In N. L. Craig, R. Craigie, M. Gellert, and A. M. Labowitz (ed.), Mobile DNA II. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
25. Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
26. Savilahti, H., P. Rice, and K. Mizuuchi. 1995. The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function. EMBO J. 14:4893-4903.
27. Singh, R. K., J. Liburd, S. J. Wardle, and D. B. Haniford. 2007. The nucleoid binding protein H-NS acts as an anti-channeling factor to favor intermolecular Tn10 transposition and dissemination. J. Mol. Biol. 374:950-962.
28. Szabo, M., J. Kiss, Z. Nagy, M. Chandler, and F. Olasz. 2008. Sub-terminal sequences modulating IS30 transposition in vivo and in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 375:337-352.
29. Tomcsanyi, T., and D. E. Berg. 1989. Transposition effect of adenine (Dam) methylation on activity of O end mutants of IS50. J. Mol. Biol. 209:191-193.
30. Ton-Hoang, B., M. Betermier, P. Polard, and M. Chandler. 1997. Assembly of a strong promoter following IS911 circularization and the role of circles in transposition. EMBO J. 16:3357-3371.
31. Ton-Hoang, B., P. Polard, and M. Chandler. 1998. Efficient transposition of IS911 circles in vitro. EMBO J. 17:1169-1181.
32. Ton-Hoang, B., P. Polard, L. Haren, C. Turlan, and M. Chandler. 1999. IS911 transposon circles give rise to linear forms that can undergo integration in vitro. Mol. Microbiol. 32:617-627.
33. Turlan, C., C. Loot, and M. Chandler. 2004. IS911 partial transposition products and their processing by the Escherichia coli RecG helicase. Mol. Microbiol. 53:1021-1033.
34. Turlan, C., B. Ton-Hoang, and M. Chandler. 2000. The role of tandem IS dimers in IS911 transposition. Mol. Microbiol. 35:1312-1325.
35. Ward, C. M., S. J. Wardle, R. K. Singh, and D. B. Haniford. 2007. The global regulator H-NS binds to two distinct classes of sites within the Tn10 transpososome to promote transposition. Mol. Microbiol. 64:1000-1013.
36. Zhang, L., A. Dawson, and D. J. Finnegan. 2001. DNA-binding activity and subunit interaction of the mariner transposase. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:3566-3575.