Graduate Preparation in Research Methods: The Current Status of APA-Accredited Professional Programs in Psychology

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 42-49

  Rossen, Eric ^a   Oakland, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

methods; preparation; research; statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 51549097542     PISSN: 19313918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1931-3918.2.1.42     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Advanced Statistical Training in Psychology Program. (2006, July). Retrieved October 3, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/science/astp.html
2. Aiken L. Report: Task force plans directory of quantitative psychologists. The Score 28 (October 2006) 7
3. Aiken L.S., West S.G., Sechrest L., and Reno R. Graduate training in statistics, methodology, and measurement in psychology: A survey of PhD programs in North America. American Psychologist 45 (1990) 721-734
4. American Psychological Association Accredited Doctoral Programs in Professional Psychology. (2005). Retrieved August 23, 2005, from http://www.apa.org/ed/accreditation/doctoral.html
5. American Psychological Association Accredited Doctoral Programs in Professional Psychology. American Psychologist 41 (1986) 1357-1363
6. American Psychological Association Committee on Accreditation. Guidelines and principles for accreditation of programs in professional psychology (2005, July). http://www.apa.org/ed/G&P052.pdf Retrieved September 28, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ed/G&P052.pdf
7. American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist 61 (2006) 271-285
8. Azar B. Mulling over methods training. Monitor on Psychology 32 (December 2001). http://www.apa.org/monitor/dec01/mulling.html Retrieved May 13, 2006, from www.apa.org/monitor/dec01/mulling.html
9. Childs R.A., and Eyde L.D. Assessment training in clinical psychology doctoral programs: What should we teach? What do we teach?. Journal of Personality Assessment 78 (2002) 130-144
10. Clay R. Too few in quantitative psychology. Monitor on Psychology 36 (2005) 26
11. Fagan T.K., and Wise P.S. School Psychology: Past, present, and future. 2nd ed. (2000), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, MD
12. Goldstein A. Making another big score. Time (2001, March 4). http://www.time.com/time/education/article/0%2C8599%2C101324%2C00.html Retrieved from http://www.time.com/time/education/article/0%2C8599%2C101324%2C00.html
13. Jorgensen M. Can the testing industry meet growing demands?. Issues in Science & Technology 19 (2002) 59
14. Munsey C. Questions of balance. An APA survey finds a lack of attention to self-care among training programs. gradPSYCH (2006, November). http://gradpsych.apags.org/nov06/cover-balance.html Retrieved April 1, 2007, from http://gradpsych.apags.org/nov06/cover-balance.html
15. National Organization for Research. Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 2004 (2004). http://www.norc.org/NR/rdonlyres/E8C1A1BA-DD9F-4AE5-81A2-E40BEC428130/0/ sed2004.pdf Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.norc.org/NR/rdonlyres/E8C1A1BA-DD9F-4AE5-81A2-E40BEC428130/0/ sed2004.pdf
16. Townsend J.T., Golden R., and Wallsten T. Quantitative training in psychology is deteriorating: Traditional methodologists, mathematical psychologists, and psychology face a challenge. Psychological Science Agenda 19 (2005, October). http://www.apa.org/science/psa/monitor.html Retrieved May 5, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/science/psa/monitor.html