Premedication to reduce discomfort during screening mammography

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 765-772

  Lambertz, Colleen K ^a   Johnson, Christopher J ^b   Montgomery, Paul G ^a   Maxwell, James R ^c  

^a St Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute   (United States)

^b Cancer Data Registry of Idaho   (United States)

^c St Luke's Boise Regional Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IBUPROFEN; LIDOCAINE; PARACETAMOL; ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TENDERNESS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTALGIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREMEDICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PRURITUS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKIN DISCOLORATION; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PLACEBO EFFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACETAMINOPHEN; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS, NON-NARCOTIC; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; IBUPROFEN; LIDOCAINE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PLACEBO EFFECT; PREMEDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 51549093016     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071490     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts and figures 2005-2006. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society, 2005.
2. Radice D. Breast cancer management: quality of life and cost considerations. Pharmacoeconomics 2003;21(6):383-396.
3. Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK, et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353(17):1784-1792.
4. Eyre H, Kahn R, Robertson RM; ACS/ADA/ AHA Collaborative Writing Committee. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. CA Cancer J Clin 2004;54(4):190-207.
5. Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, Woolf SH. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002;137(5 pt 1):347-360.
6. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer 2002;95(3):458-469.
7. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 2001;91(9):1724-1731.
8. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. HHS affirms value of mammography for detecting breast cancer, Feb 21 2002. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Web site. http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2002pres/20020221. html. Accessed June, 2008.
9. Breen N, Cronin KA, Meissner HI, et al. Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern? Cancer 2007;109(12):2405-2409.
10. Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Women's attitudes to screening after participation in the National Breast Screening Study: a questionnaire survey. Cancer 1990;65(7):1663-1669.
11. Clark RA. Economic issues in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158(3):527-534.
12. Glockner SM, Holden MG, Hilton SV, Norcross WA. Women's attitudes toward screening mammography. Am J Prev Med 1992;8(2):69-77.
13. Kornguth PJ, Rimer BK, Conaway MR, et al. Impact of patient-controlled compression on the mammography experience. Radiology 1993;186(1):99-102.
14. Levy-Storms L. Predictors of varying levels of nonadherence to mammography screening in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52(5):768-773.
15. Sapir R. Does mammography hurt? J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;25(1):53-63.
16. Stein JA, Fox SA, Murata PJ. The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography. J Health Soc Behav 1991;32(2):101-113.
17. Wallis C. A puzzling plague. Time. January 14, 1991;52.
18. Keefe FJ, Hauck ER, Egert J, Rimer B, Kornguth P. Mammography pain and discomfort: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. Pain 1994;56(3):247-260.
19. Nielsen B, Mioskowski C, Dibble S. Pain with mammography: fact or fiction? Oncol Nurs Forum 1993;20(4):639-642.
20. Rutter DR, Calnan M, Vaile MS, Field S, Wade KA. Discomfort and pain during mammography: description, prediction, and prevention. BMJ 1992;305(6851):443-445.
21. Stomper PC, Kopans DB, Sadowsky NL, et al. Is mammography painful? a multicenter patient survey. Arch Intern Med 1988;148(3):521-524.
22. Cockburn J, Cawson J, Hill D, De Luise T. An analysis of reported discomfort caused by mammographic x-ray amongst attenders at an Australian pilot breast screening program. Australas Radiol 1992;36(2):115-119.
23. Aro AR, Absetz-Ylöstalo P, Eerola T, Pamilo M, Lönnqvist J. Pain and discomfort during mammography. Eur J Cancer 1996;32A(10):1674-1679.
24. Kornguth PJ, Keefe FJ, Conaway MR. Pain during mammography: characteristics and relationship to demographic and medical variables. Pain 1996;66(2:-3):187-194.
25. Nielsen BB, Miaskowski C, Dibble SL, Beber B, Altman N, McCoy CB. Pain and discomfort associated with film-screen mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83(23):1754-1756.
26. Fox SA, Murata PJ, Stein JA. The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women. Arch Intern Med 1991;151(1):50-56.
27. Champion V. Relationship of age to mammography compliance. Cancer 1994;74(suppl 1):329-335.
28. Mandelblatt J, Kanetsky PA. Effectiveness of interventions to enhance physician screening for breast cancer. J Fam Pract 1995;40(2):162-171.
29. Schillinger JA, Mosbaek C, Austin D, et al. Health care reform in Oregon: the impact of the Oregon Health Plan on utilization of mammography. Am J Prev Med 2000;18(1):11-17.
30. Weinberger M, Saunders AF, Samsa GP, et al. Breast cancer screening in older women: practices and barriers reported by primary care physicians. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991;39(1):22-29.
31. Hamblin JE. Physician recommendations for screening mammography: results of a survey using clinical vignettes. J Fam Pract 1991;32(5):472-477.
32. Miller D, Martin I, Herbison P. Interventions for relieving the pain and discomfort of screening mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;(4):CD002942.
33. Cork RC, Isaac I, Elsharydah A, Saleemi S, Zavisca F, Alexander L. A comparison of the verbal rating scale and the visual analog scale for pain assessment. Internet J Anesthesiol 2004;8(1).
34. Asghari A, Nicholas MK. Pain during mammography: the role of coping strategies. Pain 2004;108(1):170-179.