The Akropong approach to multi-sector project planning

Futures

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 834-840

  Kemp Benedict, Eric ^a   Agyemang Bonsu, William Kojo ^b  

^a STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (Ghana)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; PLANNING PROCESS; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

AFRICA; GHANA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; WEST AFRICA;

EID: 51549090958     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.014     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fuller T. Futures studies and foresight. In: Sardar Z. (Ed). Rescuing All Our Futures: The Future of Futures Studies (1999), Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT 134-145
2. Slaughter R.A. Implementing critical futures studies. In: Sardar Z. (Ed). Rescuing All Our Futures: The Future of Futures Studies (1999), Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT 83-97
3. Gordon T.J., and Hayward H. Initial experiments with the cross impact matrix method of forecasting. Futures 1 2 (1968) 100-116
4. Helmer O. Cross-impact gaming. Futures 4 2 (1972) 149-167
5. Kane J. A primer for a new cross-impact language-KSIM. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 4 (1972) 129-142
6. Alter S. The evaluation of generic cross-impact models. Futures 11 2 (1979) 132-150
7. Helmer O. Reassessment of cross-impact analysis. Futures 13 5 (1981) 389-400
8. Beasley J.E., and Johnson R. Some cross-impact refinements. Futures 15 3 (1983) 226-228
9. Gordon T.J. Cross-impact analysis. In: Glenn J.C., and Gordon T.J. (Eds). Futures Research Methodology, V. 2. 0 (CD-ROM) (2003), American Council for the UNU, Washington, DC
10. Weimer-Jehle W. Cross-impact Balances: a system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 73 (2006) 334-361
11. T. Temel, A cross-sector priority setting method: critical information gaps in malaria research in Tanzania, ISNAR Discussion Paper No. 03-14, International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague, 2003.
12. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). A Summary of the Theory Behind the LFA Method (2003), Sida, Stockholm
13. Elgizouli I., Goubti N., Fernandes M., and Dougherty B. NAPAssess: a decision support tool for use in the Sudan NAPA process. Paper presented at the 11th Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (COP-11) (2005)
14. Glenn J.C., and The Futures Group. Scenarios. In: Glenn J.C., and Gordon T.J. (Eds). Futures Research Methodology, V. 2. 0 (CD-ROM) (2003), American Council for the UNU, Washington, DC