메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 283-301

Environmental conflict resolution practice and performance: An evaluation framework

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 51549083111     PISSN: 15365581     EISSN: 15411508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/crq.209     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (31)

References (21)
  • 1
    • 0011469621 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Examining the Claims of Environmental ADR: Evidence from Waste Management Conflicts in Ontario and Massachusetts
    • Andrew, J. S. "Examining the Claims of Environmental ADR: Evidence from Waste Management Conflicts in Ontario and Massachusetts." Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2001, 21(2), 166-183.
    • (2001) Journal of Planning Education and Research , vol.21 , Issue.2 , pp. 166-183
    • Andrew, J.S.1
  • 2
    • 34447318264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dispute Resolution as a Method of Public Participation
    • R. O'Leary and L. Bingham eds, Washington, D.C, Resources for the Future
    • Beierle, T. C., and Cayford, J. "Dispute Resolution as a Method of Public Participation." In R. O'Leary and L. Bingham (eds.), The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2003.
    • (2003) The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution
    • Beierle, T.C.1    Cayford, J.2
  • 3
    • 0022487681 scopus 로고
    • Placing Environmental Mediation in Context: Lessons Learned from 'Failed' Mediations
    • Buckle, L. G., and Thomas-Buckle, S. R. "Placing Environmental Mediation in Context: Lessons Learned from 'Failed' Mediations." Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1986, 6 (1), 55-60.
    • (1986) Environmental Impact Assessment Review , vol.6 , Issue.1 , pp. 55-60
    • Buckle, L.G.1    Thomas-Buckle, S.R.2
  • 4
    • 34547701214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What We Know About Environmental Conflict Resolution: An Analysis Based on Research
    • Dukes, E. F. "What We Know About Environmental Conflict Resolution: An Analysis Based on Research." Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2004, 22 (1-2), 191-220.
    • (2004) Conflict Resolution Quarterly , vol.22 , Issue.1-2 , pp. 191-220
    • Dukes, E.F.1
  • 5
    • 33750882438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Evaluation System for State and Federal Conflict Resolution Programs: The Policy Consensus Initiative
    • R. O'Leary and L. Bingham eds, Washington D.C, Resources for the Future
    • Emerson, K., and Carlson, C. "An Evaluation System for State and Federal Conflict Resolution Programs: The Policy Consensus Initiative." In R. O'Leary and L. Bingham (eds.), The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2003.
    • (2003) The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution
    • Emerson, K.1    Carlson, C.2
  • 7
    • 46749117524 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Implementation of Court-Annexed Environmental Mediation: The District of Oregon Pilot Project
    • Kloppenberg, L. A. "Implementation of Court-Annexed Environmental Mediation: The District of Oregon Pilot Project." Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 2002, 17 (3), 559-596.
    • (2002) Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution , vol.17 , Issue.3 , pp. 559-596
    • Kloppenberg, L.A.1
  • 8
    • 33750869762 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What Do We Know and Need to Know About the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?
    • Koontz, T. M., and Thomas, C. W. "What Do We Know and Need to Know About the Environmental Outcomes of Collaborative Management?" Public Administration Review, 2006, 66(6), 111-121.
    • (2006) Public Administration Review , vol.66 , Issue.6 , pp. 111-121
    • Koontz, T.M.1    Thomas, C.W.2
  • 9
    • 0005412619 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regulatory Negotiation Versus Conventional Rule Making: Claims, Counterclaims, and Empirical Evidence
    • Langbein, L. I., and Kerwin, C. M. "Regulatory Negotiation Versus Conventional Rule Making: Claims, Counterclaims, and Empirical Evidence." Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 2000, 10 (3), 599-632.
    • (2000) Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory , vol.10 , Issue.3 , pp. 599-632
    • Langbein, L.I.1    Kerwin, C.M.2
  • 10
    • 0038300412 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stakeholder Partnerships as Collaborative Policymaking: Evaluation Criteria Applied to Watershed Management in California and Washington
    • Leach, W, Pelkey, N. W., and Sabatier, P. A. "Stakeholder Partnerships as Collaborative Policymaking: Evaluation Criteria Applied to Watershed Management in California and Washington." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2002, 21(4), 645-670.
    • (2002) Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , vol.21 , Issue.4 , pp. 645-670
    • Leach, W.1    Pelkey, N.W.2    Sabatier, P.A.3
  • 12
    • 51549091349 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution Notice: Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
    • OMB, Apr. 12
    • OMB. "U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution Notice: Agency Information Collection: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request." Federal Register, Apr. 12, 2005, 70(69), 19097-19102.
    • (2005) Federal Register , vol.70 , Issue.69 , pp. 19097-19102
  • 13
    • 34250168238 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What Environmental and Natural Resource Attorneys Really Think About ADR: A National Survey
    • O'Leary, R., and Husar, M. "What Environmental and Natural Resource Attorneys Really Think About ADR: A National Survey." Natural Resources and Environment, 2002, 16(4), 262-264.
    • (2002) Natural Resources and Environment , vol.16 , Issue.4 , pp. 262-264
    • O'Leary, R.1    Husar, M.2
  • 14
    • 33747058125 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dispute Resolution at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    • R. O'Leary and L. Bingham eds, Washington, D.C, Resources for the Future
    • O'Leary, R., and Raines, S. S. "Dispute Resolution at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency." In R. O'Leary and L. Bingham (eds.), The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future, 2003.
    • (2003) The Promise and Performance of Environmental Conflict Resolution
    • O'Leary, R.1    Raines, S.S.2
  • 15
    • 51549092187 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is Collaborative Decision Making Good for the Environment? Presentation at Association for Conflict Reso-lution
    • Boston, June
    • Rowe, A., Hall, W, Colby, B., and Niemeyer, M. "Is Collaborative Decision Making Good for the Environment?" Presentation at Association for Conflict Reso-lution, Environment and Public Policy Section Conference, Boston, June 2006.
    • (2006) Environment and Public Policy Section Conference
    • Rowe, A.1    Hall, W.2    Colby, B.3    Niemeyer, M.4
  • 16
    • 0031786090 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Mediation
    • Sipe, N. "An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Mediation." Journal of the American Planning Association, 1998, 64(3), 275-285.
    • (1998) Journal of the American Planning Association , vol.64 , Issue.3 , pp. 275-285
    • Sipe, N.1
  • 17
    • 0028993865 scopus 로고
    • Mediating Environmental Enforcement Disputes: How Well Does It Work?
    • Sipe, N. G., and Stiftel, B. "Mediating Environmental Enforcement Disputes: How Well Does It Work?" Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 1995, 15, 139-156.
    • (1995) Environmental Impact Assessment Review , vol.15 , pp. 139-156
    • Sipe, N.G.1    Stiftel, B.2
  • 19
    • 51549095921 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • U.S. Office of Management and Budget and President's Council on Environmental Quality, Nov. 5, 2005
    • U.S. Office of Management and Budget and President's Council on Environmental Quality. Memorandum on Environmental Conflict Resolution. Nov. 5, 2005. http://www.whitehouse.gov/ceq/joint-statement.html.
    • Memorandum on Environmental Conflict Resolution
  • 21
    • 51549120310 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic Model Development Guide. Oct. 2004. http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf.
    • W. K. Kellogg Foundation. Logic Model Development Guide. Oct. 2004. http://www.wkkf.org/Pubs/Tools/Evaluation/Pub3669.pdf.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.