Closed versus open tracheal suction systems for ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: A systematic review

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 346-351

  Jin, Ling ^a   Wang, Hai Yan ^a   Li, Bin ^b  

^a People Hospital of Xinjiang Urgent care Centre   (China)

^b People Hospital of Xinjiang   (China)

Author keywords

Closed tracheal suction system; Open tracheal suction system; Randomized controlled trials; Systematic review; Ventilator associated pneumonia

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM COLONY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CLOSED DRAINAGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SUCTION DRAINAGE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VENTILATOR ASSOCIATED PNEUMONIA;

EID: 51449096190     PISSN: 16722531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Topeli A, Harmanci A, Cetinkaya Y, et al. Comparison of the effect of closed versus open endotracheal suction systems on the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Hosp Infect, 2004, 58(1): 14-19.
2. Chinese source
3. Blackwood B, Webb CH. Closed tracheal suctioning systems and infection control in the intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect, 1998, 39: 315-321.
4. Chinese source
5. Lorente L, Lecuona M, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia using a closed versus an open tracheal suction system. Crit Care Med, 2005, 33(1): 115-119.
6. Stoller JK, Orens DK, Fatica C, et al. Weekly versus daily changes of in line suction cat heters: impact on rates of ventilator associated pneumonia and associated costs. Respir Care, 2003, 48(5): 494-499.
7. Deppe SA, Kelly JW, Thoi LL, et al. Incidence of colonization, nosocomial pneumonia, and mortality in critically ill patients using a Trach Care closed-suction system versus an open-suction system: prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med, 1990, 18: 1389-1393.
8. Adams DH, Hughes M, Elliott TS. Microbial colonization of closed system suction catheters used in liver transplant patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 1997, 13(2): 72-76.
9. Zeitoun SS, De Barros AL, Diccini S. A prospective, randomized study of ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients using a closed vs. open suction system. J Clin Nurs, 2003, 12(4): 484-489.
10. Combes P, Fauvage B, Oleyer C. Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a prospective randomized evaluation of the Stericath closed suctioning system. Intensive Care Med, 2000, 26(7): 878-882.
11. Lee ES, Kim SH, Kim JS. Effects of a closed endotracheal suction system on oxygen saturation, ventilator- associated pneumonia, and nursing efficacy. Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi, 2004, 34(7): 1315-1325.
12. Johnson KL, Kearney PA, Johnson SB, et al. Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning: costs and physiologic consequences. Crit Care Med, 1994, 22: 658-666.
13. Cordero L, Sananes M, Ayers LW. Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants. J Perinatol, 2000, 20: 151-156.
14. Lee CK, Ng KS, Tan SG, et al. Effect of different endotracheal suctioning systems on cardiorespiratory parameters of ventilated patients. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2001, 30: 239-244.
15. Jongerden IP, Rovers MM, Grypdonck MH, et al. Open and closed endotracheal suction systems in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients: A meta-analysis. Crit Care Med, 2007, 35(1): 260-270.
16. Chinese source
17. Chinese source
18. Chinese source
19. Chinese source
20. Chinese source
21. Chinese source
22. Chinese source