Poor Predictive Value of Intraoperative Real-Time Dosimetry for Prostate Seed Brachytherapy

International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 605-609

  Igidbashian, Levon ^a   Donath, David ^a   Carrier, Jean François ^a   Lassalle, Stephanie ^a   Hervieux, Yannick ^a   David, Sandrine ^a   Bahary, Jean Paul ^a   Taussky, Daniel ^a  

^a NOTRE DAME HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Brachytherapy; Intraoperative planning; Prostate cancer; Real time dosimetry

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; DOSIMETERS;

BRACHYTHERAPY; INTRAOPERATIVE PLANNING; PROSTATE CANCER; REAL-TIME DOSIMETRY;

DOSIMETRY;

IODINE 125; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CANCER RISK; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATING ROOM; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; RADIATION DOSE; ROC CURVE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TREATMENT PLANNING;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; BRACHYTHERAPY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IODINE RADIOISOTOPES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RADIOMETRY; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 51449086066     PISSN: 03603016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1484     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Nag S., Ciezki J.P., Cormack R., et al. Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: Report of the American Brachytherapy Society. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51 (2001) 1422-1430
2. Zelefsky M.J., Yamada Y., Marion C., et al. Improved conformality and decreased toxicity with intraoperative computer-optimized transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55 (2003) 956-963
3. Nag S., Bice W., DeWyngaert K., et al. The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46 (2000) 221-230
4. Stock R.G., and Stone N.N. Importance of post-implant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy. Eur Urol 41 (2002) 434-439
5. Fuller D.B., Jin H., Koziol J.A., et al. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: A dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases. Brachytherapy 4 (2005) 207-216
6. Kaplan I.D., Meskell P., Oldenburg N.E., et al. Real-time computed tomography dosimetry during ultrasound-guided brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 5 (2006) 147-151
7. Meijer G.J., van den Berg H.A., Hurkmans C.W., et al. Dosimetric comparison of interactive planned and dynamic dose calculated prostate seed brachytherapy. Radiother Oncol 80 (2006) 378-384
8. Potters L., Calguaru E., Thornton K.B., et al. Toward a dynamic real-time intraoperative permanent prostate brachytherapy methodology. Brachytherapy 2 (2003) 172-180
9. Stock R.G., Stone N.N., Wesson M.F., et al. A modified technique allowing interactive ultrasound-guided three-dimensional transperineal prostate implantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32 (1995) 219-225
10. Stone N.N., and Stock R.G. Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Real-time three-dimensional interactive seed implantation. Tech Urol 1 (1995) 72-80
11. Chauveinc L., Flam T., Solignac S., et al. Prostate cancer brachytherapy: Is real-time ultrasound-based dosimetry predictive of subsequent CT-based dose distribution calculation? A study of 450 patients by the Institut Curie/Hospital Cochin (Paris) Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59 (2004) 691-695
12. Stone N.N., Hong S., Lo Y.C., et al. Comparison of intraoperative dosimetric implant representation with postimplant dosimetry in patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2 (2003) 17-25
13. Stock R.G., Stone N.N., Tabert A., et al. A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41 (1998) 101-108
14. Wallner K., Merrick G., Sutlief S., et al. High-dose regions versus likelihood of cure after prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 170-174
15. Nag S., Shi P., Liu B., et al. Comparison of real-time intraoperative ultrasound-based dosimetry with postoperative computed tomography-based dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70 (2008) 311-317
16. Zelefsky MJ. Prostate dosimetry before leaving the operating room: Fact or fiction? American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) Annual Meeting. Orlando, FL; 2007.
17. Dogan N., Mohideen N., Glasgow G.P., et al. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 53 (2002) 483-489
18. Taussky D., Austen L., Toi A., et al. Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 62 (2005) 974-980
19. Waterman F.M., Yue N., Corn B.W., et al. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: An analysis based on serial CT acquisition. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41 (1998) 1069-1077
20. Dubois D.F., Prestidge B.R., Hotchkiss L.A., et al. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of MR imaging- and CT-derived prostate volumes after transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy. Radiology 207 (1998) 785-789
21. Kalkner K.M., Kubicek G., Nilsson J., et al. Prostate volume determination: Differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS. Radiother Oncol 81 (2006) 179-183
22. Fuller D.B., Koziol J.A., and Fend A.C. Prostate brachytherapy seed migration and dosimetry: Analysis of stranded sources and other potential predictive factors. Brachytherapy 3 (2004) 10-19
23. Reed D.R., Wallner K.E., Merrick G.S., et al. A prospective randomized comparison of stranded vs. loose 125I seeds for prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 6 (2007) 129-134
24. Fuller D.B., Haoran J., Koziol J.A., et al. CT-ultrasound fusion prostate brachytherapy: A dynamic dosimetry feedback and improvement method. A report of 54 consecutive cases. Brachytherapy 4 (2005) 207-216