Antecedents to e-file adoption: The U.S. perspective

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Carter, Lemuria ^a   Schaupp, Ludwig Christian ^b   Evans, Allison ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

E filing; IT adoption

Indexed keywords

E-FILING; INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES; IT ADOPTION; SYSTEM SCIENCES;

COMPUTER NETWORKS; DECISION MAKING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVEYS;

RISK PERCEPTION;

EID: 51449085865     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.68     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30 (2). 361-391.
2. Carter, L. and Belanger, F. The Utilization of E-government Services: Citizen Trust, Innovation and Acceptance Factors. Information Systems Journal, 15 (1). 2-25.
3. Chau, Y.K. and Hu, J.H. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decision Sciences, 32 (4). 699-718.
4. Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. Computer Self-efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test. MIS Quarterly, 19 (2). 189-211.
5. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (3). 319-340.
6. Dejoy, D. The Optimism Bias and Traffic Accident Risk Perception. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 21 (4). 333-340.
7. Fletcher, P.D. E-file: Electronic Tax Administration in the United States, 2002.
8. Fu, J.-R., Farn, C.-K. and Chao, W.-P. Acceptance of electronic tax filing: A study of taxpayer intentions. Information & Management, 43. 109-126.
9. IRS. IRS e-Strategy for Growth, 2004.
10. Moore, G. and Benbasat, I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. . Information Systems Research, 2 (3). 192-222.
11. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1978.
12. Pavlou, P. Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Rsk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7. 69-103.
13. Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, S.J. and Vandenbosch, M. Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions - Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research, 12 (2). 208-222.
14. Sjoberg, L. and Fromm, J. Information Technology Risks as Seen by the Public. Risk Analsys, 21 (3). 427-441.
15. Szajna, B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science, 42 (1). 85-92.
16. Thompson, R., Higgins, C. and Howell, J. Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (1). 167-187.
17. Thompson, R., Higgins, C. and Howell, J. Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15 (1). 124-143.
18. Venkatesh, V. Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Systems Research, 11 (4). 342-365.
19. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G. and Davis, G.B. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3). 425-478.
20. Warkentin, M. and Gefen, D. Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12 (3). 157-162.
21. Weinstein, N.D. Optimistic Bias about personal risks. Science, 246. 1232-1233.
22. Weinstein, N.D. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39. 806-820.
23. Weinstein, N.D. Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 5. 441-460.