Nursery practices influence seedling morphology, field performance, and cost efficiency of containerized Cherrybark Oak

Southern Journal of Applied Forestry

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 152-162

  Howell, Kirk D ^a   Harrington, Timothy B ^b  

^a Timberwolf International Inc   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Benefit cost ratio; Forest regeneration; Plantation; Seedling quality

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; CULTIVATION; FERTILIZERS; HARDWOODS; MORPHOLOGY; SEED; SOILS;

BENEFIT COST RATIO; CONTAINER SOIL; CULTURAL TREATMENTS; NURSERY PRACTICES; PRICE EFFICIENCY; SEEDLING MORPHOLOGY; SEEDLING QUALITY; SOIL REMOVAL;

REFORESTATION;

ANATOMY; BIOMASS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; CULTIVATION; FERTILIZERS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; NURSERIES; PLANTATIONS; QUERCUS FALCATA PAGODAEFOLIA; REFORESTATION; SEEDLINGS; SILVICULTURE; SOIL;

QUERCUS; QUERCUS PAGODA;

EID: 5144232803     PISSN: 01484419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sjaf/28.3.152     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allen, J.A., B.D. Keeland, J.A. Stanturf, A.F. Clewell, and H.E. Kennedy, Jr. 2001. A guide to bottomland hardwood restoration. USDA For. Serv., South. Res. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-40. 132 p.
2. Barham, R.O. 1980. Effects of seedbed density on nursery-grown cherrybark oak. Tree Planters' Notes 31(4):7-9.
3. Bowersox, T.W. 1993. Artificial regeneration of oaks in the uplands. P. 250-263 in Proc. of a conf., Oak regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L. and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Southeastern For. Expt. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, Asheville, NC. 319 p.
4. Clutter, J.L., J.C. Fortson, L.V. Pienaar, G.H. Brister, and R.L. Bailey. 1983. Timber management: A quantitative approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 333 p.
5. Conrad, J.M. 1999. Resource economics. Cambridge University Press, New York, . 213 p.
6. Davidson, H., R. Mecklenburg, and C. Peterson. 1994. Nursery management: Administration and culture. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 486 p.
7. Harrington, T.B., and K.D. Howell. 1998. Planting cost, survival, and growth one to three years after establishing loblolly pine seedlings with straight, deformed, and pruned taproots. New Forests 15(2):193-204.
8. Hodges, J.D., and E.S. Gardiner. 1993. Ecology and physiology of oak regeneration. P. 54-65 in Proc. of a conf., Oak regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L. and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Southeastern For. Expt. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, Asheville, NC. 319 p.
9. Hunt, R. 1990. Basic growth analysis. Unwin Hyman, London, United Kingdom. 112 p.
10. Kennedy, H.E., Jr. 1993a. Artificial regeneration of bottomland oaks. P. 241-249 in Proc. of a conf., Oak regeneration: Serious problems, practical recommendations, Loftis, D.L. and C.E. McGee (eds.). USDA For. Serv., Southeastern For. Expt. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-84, Asheville, NC. 319 p.
11. Kennedy, H.E., Jr. 1993b. Effects of crown position and initial spacing on foliar nutrient composition of seven bottomland hardwoods. USDA For. Serv., South. For. Expt. Sta., Res. Note SO-371. 6 p.
12. Kormanik, P.P., R.P. Belanger, and E.W. Belcher. 1976. Survival and early growth of containerized and bareroot seedlings of cherrybark oak. Tree Planters' Notes 27(3):9-10.
13. Kormanik, P.P., S.S. Sung, D.J. Kass, and S. Schlarbaum. 1998. Effect of seedling size and first-order-lateral roots on early development of northern red oak on mesic sites. P. 247-252 in Proc. Ninth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conf., Waldrop, T.A. (ed.). USDA For. Serv., South. Res. Sta., Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-20, Asheville, NC. 628 p.
14. Krinard, R.M. 1990. Quercus falcata var. pagodifolia Ell. Cherrybark oak. P. 644-649 in Silvics of North America: Vol. 2. Hardwoods, Burns, R.M., and B.H. Honkala (tech. coords.). USDA For. Serv. Agric. Handb. 654. Washington, DC. 877 p.
15. Krinard, R.M., and J.K. Francis. 1983. Twenty-year results of planted cherrybark oak on old fields in brown loam bluffs. Tree Planters' Notes 34(4):20-22.
16. May, J.T. 1984. Seedbed preparation. P. 48-56 in Southern Pine Nursery Handbook, Lantz, C.W. (compiler). USDA For. Serv., Southern Region.
17. Moorhead, D.J. 1981. Container size and growth media influence early growth and survival of southern oaks in Mississippi. P. 20 in Proc. of workshop on seedling physiology and growth problems in oak planting, Johnson, P.S., and H.E. Garrett (compilers), USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-62. St. Paul, MO. 26 p.
18. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Vol. 2. Version 8. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 2,552 p.
19. Sokal, R.R., and J.F. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd Ed. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY. 859 p.
20. Stanturf, J.A., and H.E. Kennedy. Jr. 1996. Survival and growth of planted and direct-seeded cherrybark oak in South Carolina. South. J. Appl. For. 20(4):194-196.
21. USDA National Resources Conservation Service. 2003. Official description of the Congaree soil series, ortho.ftw.nrcs.usda.gov/osd/osd.html. Accessed January 23, 2004.
22. Williams, H.M., and M.N. Craff. 1998. First-year survival and growth of bareroot, container, and direct-seeded Nuttall oak planted on flood-prone agricultural fields. P. 300-303 in Proc. of the Ninth Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Waldrop, T.A. (ed.), USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-20, Asheville, NC. 628 p.
23. Williams, H., and M. Stroupe. 2002. First-year survival and growth of bareroot and container water oak and willow oak seedlings grown at different levels of mineral nutrition. P. 338-341 in Proc. of the Eleventh Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Outcalt, K.W. (ed.), USDA For. Serv., Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-48, Asheville, NC. 622 p.