Comparison of odour emission rates measured from various sources using two sampling devices

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 100, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 118-124

  Hudson, N ^a,b   Ayoko, G A ^a   Dunlop, M ^b   Duperouzel, D ^b   Burrell, D ^b   Bell, K ^b   Gallagher, E ^b   Nicholas, P ^c   Heinrich, N ^c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES   (Australia)

^c FSA Consulting   (Australia)

Author keywords

Device; Emission rate; Odour; Sampling

Indexed keywords

ODORS; SAMPLING; WIND TUNNELS;

COMPLEX RELATIONSHIPS; DEVICE; DISPERSION MODELS; DYNAMIC OLFACTOMETRY; EMISSION RATES; ODOUR CONCENTRATIONS; ODOUR EMISSION RATES; SAMPLING DEVICES;

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS;

AGRICULTURAL EMISSION; AIR QUALITY; AIR SAMPLING; ATMOSPHERIC MODELING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FLUSHING; FLUX CHAMBER; ODOR; POLLUTANT SOURCE; WIND TUNNEL;

AGRICULTURE; AIR ANALYSIS; AIR SAMPLING; ARTICLE; ODOR; OLFACTOMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 51349155029     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.043     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bicudo J., Clanton C., Schmidt D., Powers W., Jacobson L., and Tengman C. Geotextile covers to reduce odor and gas emissions from swine manure storage ponds. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 20 (2004) 65-75
2. Bliss P., Jiang K., and Schulz T. The development of a sampling system for determining odor emission rates from areal surfaces: part II. Mathematical model. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association 45 (1995) 989-994
3. Carson P., and Round P. Feedlot odours. Agricultural odour workshop Sydney (1990), State Pollution Control Commission, Australia
4. CEN, 1999. EN 13725 Odour Concentration Measurement by Dynamic Olfactometry, EN 13725. CEN, Brussels, Belgium.
5. Cicek, N., Zhou, X., Zhang, Q., Tenuta, M., 2004. Impact of straw cover on greenhouse gas and odor emissions from manure storage lagoons using a flux hood. In: 2004 ASAE/CSAE Annual International Meeting. ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan, 044054 p.
6. Gao F., and Yates S. Laboratory study of closed and dynamic flux chambers: experimental results and implications for field application. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (1998) 26 115-126, 125
7. Gao F., and Yates S. Simulation of enclosure-based methods for measuring gas emissions from soil to the atmosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (1998) 26 127-26, 136
8. Gostelow, P., Longhurst, P., Parsons, S., Stuetz, R., 2003. Sampling for measurement of odours. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 17. IWA Publishing, London.
9. Hudson N., and Ayoko G. Odour sampling. 1. Physical chemistry considerations. Bioresource Technology 99 (2007) 3982-3992
10. Hudson N., and Ayoko G. Odour sampling. 2. Comparison of physical and aerodynamic characteristics of sampling devices. A review. Bioresource Technology 99 (2007) 3993-4007
11. Hudson N., Ayoko G., Collman G., Gallgher E., Dunlop M., and Duperouzel D. Long-term assessment of efficacy of permeable pond covers for odour reduction. Bioresource Technology 99 (2008) 6409-6418
12. Hudson N., Gies A., and Duperouzel D. Assessment of permeable covers for odour reduction in piggery effluent ponds. 2. Field-scale trials. Bioresource Technology 97 (2006) 2015-2023
13. Hudson N., McGahan E., Casey K., Lowe S., Galvin G., and Dunlop M. Odour emissions from anaerobic piggery ponds. 1. Results of a three-season, 14-month survey. Bioresource Technology 98 (2007) 1877-1887
14. Irish Environmental Protection Agency, 2001. Odour impacts and odour emission control measures for intensive agriculture. R&D Report Series No. 14, Bath. OdourNet UK, UK.
15. Jiang K., Bliss P., and Schulz T. The development of a sampling system for determining odor emission rates from areal surfaces. Part I. Aerodynamic performance. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association 45 (1995) 917-922
16. Klenbusch, M., 1986. Measurement of gaseous emission rates from land surfaces using an emission isolation flux chamber. EPA/600/8-86/008. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, US EPA, Las Vegas, Nevada.
17. Lawes Agricultural Trust, 2005. GenStat Version 8.1.0.152. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted.
18. Lim T.-T., Heber A., Ni J.-Q., Sutton A., and Shao P. Odor and gas release from anaerobic treatment lagoons for swine manure. Journal of Environmental Quality 32 (2003) 406-416
19. Liss P., and Slater P. Flux of gases across the air-sea interface. Nature (London) 247 (1974) 181
20. Lunney, C., Smith, R., 1995. An odour emission model for feedlots. Research and the feedlot industry: meeting the challenge. In: Feedlot Waste Management Conference, Meat & Livestock. Australia.
21. National Research Council of the National Academies. Air Emissions from Animal Feeding Operations: Current Knowledge Future Needs (2003), The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
22. Nicholas, P., Watts, P., Heinrich, N., Hudson, N., Bell, K., 2004. Development of odour performance criteria for the Australian feedlot industry. Report Prepared for MLA, Project FLOT. 323. FSA Consulting, Toowoomba, Queensland.
23. Nicholas, P., Casey, K., James, V., 1999. Redevelopment of the DPI ILEMS forced-choice dynamic olfactometer. In: Third Queensland Pig Science Seminar. Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Queensland, 39 p.
24. Ormerod R. Modelling emissions and dispersion of feedlot odour: a case study. Proceedings of a Workshop on Agricultural Odours (1991), Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
25. Pollock, T., 1997. Dispersion modelling to predict off-site impact of odour sources. In: Proceedings of the National Workshop on Odour Measurement Standardisation. UNSW, Sydney, 95-104 p.
26. Smith R. A Gaussian model for estimating odour emissions from area sources. Mathematical Computer Modelling 22 (1995) 23-29
27. Smith, R., Kelly, J., 1996. A comparison of two methods for estimating odour emissions from area sources. In: International Conference on Air Pollution from Agricultural Operations. ASAE, St. Joseph, Michigan.
28. Smith R., and Watts P. Determination of odour emission rates from cattle feedlots. Part 1. A review. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 57 (1994) 145-155
29. Smith R., and Watts P. Determination of odour emission rates from cattle feedlots. Part 2. Evaluation of two wind tunnels of different size. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 58 (1994) 231-240
30. Standards Australia, Standards New Zealand, 2001. Stationary source emissions. AS/NZS 4323.3:2001. Standards Australia, Strathfield, New South Wales.
31. Wang, X., Jiang, J., Kaye, R., 2001. Improvement of wind tunnel sampling system for odour and VOC's. In: First IWA International Conference on Odour and VOCs: Measurement, Regulation and Control Techniques. IWA, 147-154 p.
32. Wanninkhof R. Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. Journal of Geophysical Research 97 (1992) 7373-7382
33. Watts P., Jones M., Lott S., Tucker R., and Smith R. Feedlot odor emissions following heavy rainfall. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 37 (1994) 629-636
34. Zeller, L., Atzeni, M., Jacuinde, G., 2002. Automation of a dynamic olfactometer for odour determination. In: Australian Conference on Engineering in Agriculture, Wagga Wagga. Institution of Engineers, Australia.