The sensitivity of reconstructed images and process engineering metrics to key choices in practical electrical impedance tomography

Measurement Science and Technology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2008, Pages

  Stephenson, D R ^a   Mann, R ^a   York, T A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Discrete Picard condition; EIT; Gauss Newton; Measurement strategy; Reconstruction algorithm; Singular value decomposition; Tikhonov

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENT; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; ERRORS; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MIXING; PARAMETERIZATION; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION; TANKS (CONTAINERS); TOMOGRAPHY;

DISCRETE PICARD CONDITION; GAUSS NEWTON; MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES; RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHMS; TIKHONOV;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 51349141311     PISSN: 09570233     EISSN: 13616501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/19/9/094013     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Williams R A and Beck M S 1995 Process Tomography: Principles, Techniques and Applications (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann)
2. York T A 2004 Electrical tomography for industrial applications Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications ed D Holder (London: Institute of Physics) pp 295-347 IOP series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
3. Stephenson D R, York T A and Mann R 2007 Requirements and performance of process ERT instruments 5th World Congress on Industrial Process Tomography (Bergen, Norway) pp 895-901
4. Lionheart W R B, Polydorides N and Borsic A 2004 The reconstruction problem Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications ed D Holder (London: Institute of Physics) pp 3-64 IOP series in Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
5. Polydorides N and Lionheart W R B 2002 A MatLab toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the electrical impedance and diffuse optical reconstruction software project Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 1871-83
6. Cheney M and Isaacson D 1992 Distinguishability in impedance imaging IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39 852-60
7. Wang M 1994 Electrical impedance tomography on conducting walled process vessels PhD Thesis University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology
8. Murphy S C, Stanley S J, Rhodes D and York T A 2006 3D electrical tomographic imaging using vertical arrays of electrodes Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 3053-65
9. Hansen P C 1998 Rank-Deficient and Discrete Ill-Posed Problems (Philadelphia: SIAM)
10. Cheng K-S, Isaacson D, Newell J C and Gisser D G 1989 Electrode models for electric current computed tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36 918-24
11. Hansen P C 1990 The discrete Picard condition for discrete ill-posed problems BIT Numer. Math. 30 658-72
12. Wilkinson A J, Randall E W, Long T M and Collins A 2006 The design of an ERT system for 3D data acquisition and a quantitative evaluation of its performance Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 2088-96
13. Yorkey T J, Webster J G and Tompkins W J 1987 Comparing reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance tomography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34 843-52
14. Yang W Q and Peng L 2003 Image reconstruction algorithms for electrical capacitance tomography Meas. Sci. Technol. 14 R1-13
15. Wang M 2002 Inverse solutions for electrical impedance tomography based on conjugate gradients methods Meas. Sci. Technol. 13 101-17
16. Yang W Q, Spink D M, York T A and McCann H 1999 An image reconstruction algorithm based on Landweber's iteration method for electrical capacitance tomography Meas. Sci. Technol. 10 1065-9
17. Ruskowski S 1994 A rational method for measuring blending performance, and comparison of different impeller types IChemE Symp. Series vol 136 pp 283-91
18. Oldshue J Y 1983 Mixing Fluid Technology (New York: McGraw-Hill)