Sensitivity of Eimeria field isolates in the United Sstates: Responses of nicarbazin-containing anticoccidials

Poultry Science

Volumn 87, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1760-1767

  Bafundo, K W ^a   Cervantes, H M ^a   Mathis, G F ^b  

^a Phibro Animal Health Corporation   (United States)

^b Southern Poultry Research Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug sensitivity; Ionophore resistance; Narasin + nicarbazin; Nicarbazin

Indexed keywords

AVES; COCCIDIA; EIMERIA;

EID: 51349136179     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00129     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Augustine, P. C., C. K. Smith, H. D. Danforth, and M. D. Ruff. 1987. Effect of ionophorous anticoccidials on invasion and development of Eimeria: Comparison of sensitive and resistant isolates and correlation with drug uptake. Poult. Sci. 66:960-965.
2. Bafundo, K. W., and B. Hopkins. 2000. Laboratory and field observations on the effectiveness of selected ionophores with reference to continuous usage practices. Poult. Sci. 79(Suppl. 1):106. (Abstr.)
3. Bafundo, K. W., and T. K. Jeffers. 1990. Selection for resistance to monensin, nicarbazin and the monensin plus nicarbazin combination. Poult. Sci. 69:1485-1490.
4. Callender, M. E., D. J. Donovan, L. V. Tonkinson, and R. F. Shumard. 1987. Dose titration of the anticoccidial combination of narasin and nicarbazin. Poult. Sci. 66(Suppl. 1):74. (Abstr.)
5. Callender, M. E., and T. K. Jeffers. 1980. Anticoccidial combinations comprising nicarbazin and the polyether antibiotics. US Patent No. 4,218,438. Eli Lilly and Co., assignee.
6. Chapman, H. D. 1979. Studies on the sensitivity of recent field isolates of Eimeria maxima to monensin. Avian Pathol. 8:181-186.
7. Chapman, H. D. 1980. Studies on the sensitivity of field isolates of Eimeria maxima to combinations of anticoccidial drugs. Avian Pathol. 9:67-76.
8. Chapman, H. D. 1986. Isolates of Eimeria tenella: Studies on resistance to ionophorous anticoccidial drugs. Res. Vet. Sci. 41:281-282.
9. Chapman, H. D. 1989. Field isolates of E. tenella: Sensitivity to diclazuril, maduramicin, narasin, salinomycin and a mixture of nicarbazin/narasin. Pages 323-326 in Coccidia and Intestinal Coccidiomorphs: Proceedings of the Vth International Coccidiosis Conference, Tours, France. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.
10. Chapman, H. D. 1994. A review of the biological activity of the anticoccidial drug nicarbazin and its application for the control of coccidiosis in poultry. Poult. Sci. Rev. 5:231-243.
11. Chapman, H. D. 2005. Perspectives for the control of coccidiosis in poultry by chemotherapy and vaccination. Pages 99-103 in Proceedings of the IXth International Coccidiosis Conference, Foz de Iguassu, Parana, Brazil. Apinco Foundation of Poultry Science and Technology, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
12. Guneratne, J. R. M., and D. I. Gard. 1991. A comparison of three continuous and four shuttle anticoccidial programs. Poult. Sci. 70:1888-1894.
13. Jeffers, T. K. 1989. Anticoccidial drug resistance: A review with emphasis on the polyether ionophores. Pages 295-309 in Coccidia and Intestinal Coccidiomorphs: Proceedings of the Vth International Coccidiosis Conference, Tours, France. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France.
14. Johnson, J., and W. M. Reid. 1970. Anticoccidial drugs: Lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp. Parasitol. 28:30-36.
15. Long, P. L., J. Johnson, and M. E. McKenzie. 1988. Anticoccidial activity of combinations of narasin and nicarbazin. Poult. Sci. 67:248-252.
16. Mathis, G. F. 1999. Anticoccidial sensitivity of recent field isolates of chicken coccidia. Poult. Sci. 78(Suppl. 1):116. (Abstr.)
17. Mathis, G. F. 2005. Poultry coccidiosis control: From now to the next coccidiosis conference. Page 3 in Proceedings of the IXth International Coccidiosis Conference, Foz de Iguassu, Parana, Brazil. Apinco Foundation of Poultry Science and Technology, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
18. McDougald, L. R. 1981. Anticoccidial drug resistance in the United States: Polyether, ionophorous drugs. Avian Dis. 25:600-609.
19. McDougald, L. R., L. Fuller, and J. Solis. 1986. Drug sensitivity of 99 isolates of coccidia from broiler farms. Avian Dis. 30:690-694.
20. Naciri, M., K. DeGussem, G. Fort, N. Bernardet, F. Nerat, and A. M. Chausse. 2003. Utility of anticoccidial sensitivity tests (ASTs) in the prevention of chicken coccidiosis. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:826-827.
21. Ruff, M. D., H. D. Danforth, and G. C. Wilkins. 1997. Interpreting results of anticoccidial testing. Page 53 in Control of Coccidiosis into the Next Millennium: Proceedings of the VIIth International Coccidiosis Conference. Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berks, UK.
22. SAS Institute. 2004. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
23. Smith, C. K., R. B. Galloway, and S. L. White. 1981. Effect of ionophores on survival, penetration and development of Eimeria tenella sporozoites in vitro. J. Parasitol. 67:511-516.
24. Tamas, T., K. D. Schleim, and G. Wilks. 1991. Development of resistance against amprolium, nicarbazin, maduramicin, lasalocid and Maxiban. Poult. Sci. 70(Suppl. 1):119. (Abstr.)
25. Tamas, T., and G. Wilks. 1989. Development of resistance against narasin and narasin + nicarbazin. Poult. Sci. 68(Suppl. 1):146. (Abstr.)
26. Wang, C. C. 1978. Biochemical and nutritional aspects of coccidia. Pages 135-184 in Avian Coccidiosis: Proceedings of the 13th Poultry Science Symposium. P. L. Long, K. N. Boorman, and B. M. Freeman, ed. British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh, UK.
27. Watkins, K. L. 1997. Are sensitivity test results good predictors of anticoccidial field efficacy? in Control of coccidiosis into the next millennium. Page 53 in Proceedings of the VIIth International Coccidiosis Conference. Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berks, UK.
28. Watkins, K. L., and K. W. Bafundo. 1993. Effect of anticoccidial programs on broiler performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2:55-60.