Encoding and decoding spikes for dynamic stimuli

Neural Computation

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 2325-2360

  Natarajan, Rama ^a   Huys, Quentin J M ^b   Dayan, Peter ^b   Zemel, Richard S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 51349131136     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2008.01-07-436     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ackley, D. H., Hinton, G. F., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1985). A learning algorithm for Boltzmann machines. Cognitive Science, 9, 147-169.
2. Barbieri, R., Frank, L. M., Nguyen, D. P., Quirk, M. C., Solo, V., Wilson, M. A., & Brown, E. N. (2004). Dynamic analyses of information encoding in neural ensembles. Neural Comp., 16, 277-307.
3. Baxter, J., & Bartlett, P. L. (2001). Infinite-horizon policy-gradient estimation. Journal of Artificial intelligence Research, 15, 319-350.
4. Brockwell, A. E., Rojas, A. L., & Kass, R. E. (2004). Recursive Bayesian decoding of motor cortical signals by particle filtering. J. Neurophysiol., 91, 1899-1907.
5. Brown, E. N., Frank, L. M., Tang, D., Quirk, M. C., & Wilson, M. A. (1998). A statistical paradigm for neural spike train decoding applied to position prediction from ensemble firing patterns of rat hippocampal place cells. J. Neurosci., 18(18), 7411-7425.
6. Cover, T., & Thomas, J. (2006). Elements of information theory (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
7. Dean, I., Harper, N. S., & McAlpine, D. (2005). Neural population coding of sound level adapts to stimulus statistics. Nat. Neurosci., 8(12), 1097-6256.
8. Gao, Y., Black, M. J., Bienenstock, E., Shoham, S., & Donoghue, J. P. (2002). Probabilistic inference of hand motion from neural activity in motor cortex. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 14. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Hinton, G. E., & Brown, A. D. (2000). Spiking Boltzmann machines. In S. A. Solla, T. K. Leen, & K.-R. Miller (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 12. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Huys, Q. J. M., Zemel, R., Natarajan, R., & Dayan, P. (2007). Fast population coding. Neural Comp., 19(2), 404-441.
11. Kistler, W., Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J. L. (1997). Reduction of Hodgkin-Huxley equations to a threshold model. Neural Comput., 9, 1069-1100.
12. Körding, K., & Wolpert, D. M. (2004). Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, 427(6971), 244-247.
13. MacKay, D. J. (2003). information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Nirenberg, S., Carcieri, S. M., Jacobs, A. L., & Latham, P. E. (2001). Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders. Nature, 411, 698-701.
15. Paninski, L. (2003). Convergence properties of three spike-triggered analysis techniques. Network, 14(3), 437-464.
16. Pola, G., Thiele, A., Hoffmann, K.-P., Sr Panzeri, S. (2003). An exact method to quantify the information transmitted by different mechanisms of correlational coding. Network: Comput. Neural Syst., 14(1), 35-60.
17. Pouget, A., Dayan, P., & Zemel, R. S. (2003). Inference and computation with population codes. Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 26, 318-410.
18. Pouget, A., Deneve, S., Ducom, J.-C., & Latham, P. E. (1999). Narrow vs. wide tuning curves: What's best for a population code? Neural Computation, 11(1), 85-90.
19. Pouget, A., Zhang, K., Deneve, S., & Latham, P. E. (1998). Statistically efficient estimation using population coding. Neural Comp., 10(2), 373-401.
20. Seung, S. H., & Sompolinsky, H. (1993). Simple models for reading neuronal population codes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90(22), 10749-10753.
21. Smith, E., & Lewicki, M. S. (2005). Efficient coding of time-relative structure using spikes. Neural Comp., 17, 19-45.
22. Twum-Danso, N., & Brockett, R. (2001). Trajectory estimation from place cell data. Neural Networks, 14, 835-844.
23. Vickers, N. J., Christensen, T. A., Baker, T., & Hildebrand, J. G. (2001). Odour-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code. Nature, 410, 466-470.
24. Wu, S., Nakahara, H., & Amari, S. (2001). Population coding with correlation and an unfaithful model. Neural Comp., 13(4), 775-797.
25. Wu, W., Black, M. J., Mumford, D., Gao, Y., Bienenstock, E., & Donoghue, J. P. (2004). Modeling and decoding motor cortical activity using a switching Kalman filter. IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engineering, 51(6), 933-942.
26. Zemel, R. S., Dayan, P., & Pouget, A. (1998). Probabilistic interpretation of population codes. Neural Comp., 10(2), 403-430.
27. Zemel, R. S., Huys, Q. J. M., Natarajan, R., & Dayan, P. (2005). Probabilistic computation in spiking populations. In L. K. Saul, Y. Weiss, Bottou (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 17 (pp. 1609-1616). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Zhang, K., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1999). Neuronal tuning: To sharpen or To broaden. Neural Comp., 11(1), 75-84.