PLATHO - A dynamic plant growth model considering competition between individuals and allocation to carbon-based secondary compounds

Proceedings - Second International Symposium on Plant Growth Modeling, Simulation, Visualization and Applications, PMA 2006

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 85-92

  Gayler, Sebastian ^a   Priesack, Eckart ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CIRCUIT SIMULATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CARBON AND NITROGEN; CONCEPTUAL HYPOTHESIS; INTERNAL SOURCE; MIXED CULTURES; PLANT GROWTH MODELING; PLANT GROWTH SIMULATIONS; SECONDARY COMPOUNDS; SIMULATION STUDIES;

VISUALIZATION;

CARBOHYDRATES; CARBON; CONCENTRATION; CONTROL EQUIPMENT; DYNAMICS; GROWTH; NITROGEN COMPOUNDS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PLANTS; PNEUMATIC EQUIPMENT; SYNTHESIS; TREES;

EID: 51349083641     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/PMA.2006.39     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. F. Bazzaz. Allocation of resources in plants: State of the science and critical questions. In F. Bazzaz and J. Grace, editors, Plant Resource Allocation, pages 1-37. Academic Press, San Diego, 1997.
2. H. Bossel. Treedyn3 forest simulation model. Ecological Modelling, 90:187-227, 1996.
3. J. Bryant, F. Chapin, and D. Klein. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos, 40:357-368, 1983.
4. S. v. Caemmerer and G. Farquhar. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 153:376-387, 1981.
5. P. Coley, J. Bryant, and F. Chapin. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science, 230:895-899, 1985.
6. R. A. Dixon. Natural products and plant disease resistance. Nature, 411:843-847, 2001.
7. P. V. Fine, Z. Miller, I. Mesones, S. Irazuzta, H. Appel, M. Stevens, I. Sksjrvi, J. Schultz, and P. Coley. The growthdefense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in amazonian forests. Ecology, 87(7) Supplement:150-162, 2006.
8. S. Gayler, T. Grams, A. Kozovits, G. Luedemann, B. Winkler, and E. Priesack. Analysis of competition effects in mono- and mixed cultures of juvenile beech and spruce by means of the plant growth simulation model platho. Plant Biology, 8:503-514, 2006.
9. S. Gayler, C. Leser, E. Priesack, and D. Treutter. Modelling the effect of environmental factors on the "trade-off between growth and defensive compounds in young apple trees. Trees, 18:363-371, 2004.
10. S. Gayler and E. Priesack. Platho - documentation, 2003. http://www.sfb607.de/english/projects/c2/platho.pdf.
11. S. Gayler, E. Wang, E. Priesack, T. Schaaf, and F.-X. Maidl. Modeling biomass growth, n-uptake and phenological development of potato crop. Geoderma, 105:367-383, 2002.
12. C. Glynn, D. A. Herms, M. Egawa, R. Hansen, and W. J. Mattson. Effects of nutrient availability on biomass allocation as well as constitutive and rapid induced herbivore resistance in poplar. Oikos, 101(2):385-397, 2003.
13. T. E. E. Grams, A. R. Kozovits, I. M. Reiter, J. B. Winkler, M. Sommerkorn, H. Blaschke, K.-H. Haberle, and R. Matyssek. Quantifying competitiveness in woody plants. Plant Biology, 4:153-158, 2002.
14. J. Hamilton, A. Zangerl, E. DeLucia, and M. Berenbaum. The carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis: its raise and fall. Ecological Letters, 4:86-95, 2001.
15. D. A. Herms and W. J. Mattson. The dilemma of plants: To grow or defend. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 67(3):283-335, 1992.
16. F. Hoffmann. Fagus, a model for growth and development of beech. Ecological Modelling, 83:327-348, 1995.
17. J. Hutson and R. Wagenet. Leachm: Leaching estimation and chemistry model: a process-based model of water and solute movement, transformations, plant uptake and chemical reactions in the unsaturated zone, version 3.0. Technical Report Research Series No. 93-3, Cornell University., 1992.
18. M. v. Ittersum, P. Leffelaar, H. v. Keulen, M. Kropff, L. Bastiaans, and J. Goudriaan. On approaches and applications of the wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy, 18:201-234, 2003.
19. C. A. Jones and J. R. Kiniry, editors. CERES-Maize. A Simulation Model of Maize Growth and Development. Texas A&M University Press, 1986.
20. C. G. Jones and S. E. Hartley. A protein competition model of phenolic allocation. Oikos, 86:27-44, 1999.
21. J. Koricheva. The carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis is dead; long live the carbon-nutrient hypothesis? OIKOS, 98(3):537-539, 2002.
22. J. Koricheva. Meta-analysis of sources of variation in fitness costs of plant antiherbivore defenses. Ecology, 83(1):176-190, 2002.
23. 3 levels throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Global Change Biology, 11:1387-1401, 2005.
24. A. R. Kozovits, R. Matyssek, J. B. Winkler, A. Göttlein, H. Blaschke, and T. E. E. Grams. Above-ground space sequestration determines competitive success in juvenile beech and spruce trees. New Phytologist, 167:181-196, 2005.
25. M. J. Kropff and H. H. v. Laar, editors. Modelling Crop-Weed Interactions. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, 1993.
26. W. Loomis. Growth differentiation balance vs. carbohydrate-nitrogen ratio. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 29:240-245, 1932.
27. M. Lötscher and S. Gayler. Contribution of current photosynthates to root respiration of non-nodulated medicago sativa: effects of light and nitrogen supply. Plant Biology, 7(6):601-610, 2005.
28. 2 enrichment and carbon partitioning to phenolics: do plant responses accord better with the protein competition or the growth-differentiation balance model? Oiokos, 111:337-347, 2005.
29. R. Matyssek, R. Agerer, D. Ernst, J. C. Munch, W. Osswald, H. Pretzsch, E. Priesack, H. Schnyder, and D. Treutter. The plant's capacity in regulating resource demand. Plant Biology, 7:560-580, 2005.
30. R. Matyssek, H. Schnyder, E.-F. Elstner, J.-C. Munch, H. Pretzsch, and H. Sandermann. Growth and parasite defence in plants: the balance between resource sequestration and retention. Plant Biology, 4(2):133-136, 2002.
31. H. Nykänen and J. Koricheva. Damage-induced changes in woody plants and their effects on insect herbivore performance: a meta-analysis. Oikos, 104:247-268, 2004.
32. E. Priesack. Expert-N - Dokumentation der Modellbibliothek. FAM-Bericht 60, Hieronymus Verlag, München, 2006.
33. J. Simunek, K. Huang, and M. van Genuchten. The hydrus code for simulating the one-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media.version 6.0. Technical Report Techn. Report 144, U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA, ARS, 1998.
34. N. Stamp. Out of the quagmire of plant defense-hypotheses. The Quaterly Review of Biology, 78:23-55, 2003.
35. J. Tuomi, T. Fagerstrom, and P. Niemela. Carbon allocation, phenotypic plasticity, and induced defense. In D. Tallamy and M. Raupp, editors, Phytochemical Induction by Herbivores, pages 85-104. John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y. USA, 1991.
36. D. Wainhouse, R. Ashburner, E. Ward, and J. Rose. The effect of variation in light and nitrogen on growth and defence in young sitka spruce. Functional Ecology, 12(4):561-572, 1998.
37. E. Wang, M. Robertson, G. Hammer, P. Carberry, D. Holzworth, H. Meinke, S. C. Chapman, J. Hargreaves, N. Huth, and G. McLean. Development of a generic crop model template in the cropping system model apsim. European Journal of Agronomy, 18:121-140, 2002.
38. 2. Photosynthesis Research, 39:413-425, 1994.