The alignment of form and function: Corpus-based evidence from Russian

International Journal of Corpus Linguistics

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 511-534

  Brown, Dunstan ^a   Tiberius, Carole ^b   Corbett, Greville G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b Radboud University Nijmegen and Institute for Dutch Lexicology (INL)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Form; Frequency; Function; Inflectional allomorphy; Network Morphology; Nominals; Russian; Syncretism

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249156760     PISSN: 13846655     EISSN: 15699811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.12.4.04bro     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baayen, R. H. & Sproat, R. (1996). Estimating lexical priors for low-frequency morphologically ambiguous forms. Computational Linguistics 22, 155-166
2. Baerman, M., Brown, D. & Corbett, G. (2005). The Syntax-Morphology Interface: A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Brown, D. (2007). Peripheral Functions and Overdifferentiation: the Russian Second Locative. Russian Linguistics 31, 1, 61-76
4. Brown, D. (1998a). From the General to the Exceptional: A Network Morphology Account of Russian Nominal Inflection. PhD thesis, University of Surrey
5. Brown, D. (1998b). Defining 'subgender': virile and devirilized nouns in Polish. Lingua 104, 187-233
6. Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1996). Paradigmatic Structure: Inflectional Paradigms and Morphological Classes. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Handbook of Morphology (pp. 322-334). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
7. Corbett, G. G. & Fraser, N. M. (1993). Network morphology: A DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29, 113-142
8. Corbett, G. G., Hippisley, A., Brown, D. & Marriott, P. (2001). Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: a perspective from Russian on a complex relation. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure (pp. 201-226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins
9. Evans, N., Brown, D. & Corbett, G. G. (2001). Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2000 (pp. 187-231). Dordrecht: Kluwer
10. Evans, R. & Gazdar, G. (1996). DATR: A Language for Lexical Knowledge Representation. Computational Linguistics 22, 167-216
11. Mańczak, W. (1966). La nature du supplétivisme. Linguistics 28, 82-89
12. Sharoff, S. (2006). Methods and tools for development of the Russian Reference Corpus. In A. Wilson, D. Archer & P. Rayson (Eds.), Corpus Linguistics Around the World (pp. 167-180). Amsterdam: Rodopi
13. Sitchinava, D. (2002). K zadače sozdanija korpusov russkogo jazyka. Available at: http://www.mccme.ru/ling/mitrius/article.html
14. Stump, G. T. (2001). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
15. Zwicky, A. (1985). How to describe inflection. In M. Niepokuj, M. Van Clay, V. Nikiforidou & D. Feder (Eds.), Proceedings of the eleventh annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 372-386). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society