The Possibility of Mixed-Mode Surveys in Sociological Studies

International Journal of Japanese Sociology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 51-63

  Hayashi, Takuya ^a  

^a NARA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Mixed mode survey; Representativeness; Response rate

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249148715     PISSN: 09187545     EISSN: 14756781     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6781.2007.00099.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Dillman, Don A and John Tarnai. 1988. “Administrative Issues in Mixed-mode Surveys.” pp. 509–528. In: Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by Robert M Groves, Paul P Biemer, Lars E Lyberg, James T Massey, William L Nicholls, II, and Joseph Waksberg. New York: John Wiley.
2. Dillman, Don A 2000. “Mixed-Mode Surveys.” pp. 217–244. In: Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method, edited by Don A Dillman. New York: John Wiley.
3. Esbensen, Finn-Aage and Scott Menard. 1991. Interviewer-related Measurement Error in Attitudinal Research: a Nonexperimental Study. Quality and Quantity 25: 151–165.
4. Herman, Jeanne B. 1977. Mixed-mode Data Collection: Telephone and Personal Interviewing. Journal of Applied Psychology 62: 399–404.
5. Hochstim, Joseph R. 1967. A Critical Comparison of Three Strategies of Collecting Data from Households. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 976–989.
6. Holbrook, Allyson L, Melanie C Green and Jon A Krosnick. 2003. Telephone versus Face-to-face Interviewing of National Probability Samples with Long Questionnaires: Comparisons of Respondent Satisficing and Social Desirability Response Bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 67: 79–125.
7. Inaba, Taichi and Tokio Yasuda. 2005. “JGSS-2003 kaishu ritsu narabi ni keppyou no bunseki (Response Rates and Analysis on Nonresponses in JGSS-2003).” pp. 301–305. In: JGSS Kenkyuu Ronbun Shuu[4] (JGSS Monographs No. 4), edited by Institute of Regional Studies, Osaka University of Commerce, and Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo. Osaka: Osaka University of Commerce. (In Japanese.)
8. Karp, Jeffrey A and David Brockington. 2005. Social Desirability and Response Validity: a Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries. The Journal of Politics 67–3: 825–840.
9. De Leeuw, Edith D. 2005. To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys. The Journal of Official Statistics 21: 233–255.
10. Maeda, Tadahiko. 2005. Yusou chousahou no tokuchou ni kansuru ichi kousatsu: mensetsu chousahou tono hikaku wo chushin toshite (A Study on the Characteristics of Mail Survey: a Comparison with Face-to-face Interviewing). Toukei Suuri (Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics) 53–1: 57–81. (In Japanese.)
11. Mamada, Takao and Takeo Nishimura. 1986. Yusou chousa no kanousei (Possibility of Mail Survey). Gendai Shakaigaku (Review of Contemporary Sociology) 12–1: 120–145. (In Japanese.)
12. Mangione, Thomas W, Ralph W Hingson and Jane Barrett. 1982. Collecting Sensitive Data: a Comparison of Three Survey Strategies. Sociological Methods and Research 10: 337–346.
13. Matsumoto, Yasushi. 2002. 2000 nen tokyo ban sougou shakai chousa ni okeru hyouhon no daihyousei (Representativeness of the General Social Survey in Tokyo in 2000). Sougou Toshi Kenkyuu (Comprehensive Urban Studies) 78: 131–145. (In Japanese.)
14. Misumi, Kazuto. 2005. “2003 nen nihon yobichousa ni okeru kaishu joukyouno kiso bunseki (Basic Analysis on Response of Japanese SSM Pilot Survey in 2003).” pp. 277–294. In: Gendai Nihon Ni Okeru Gender to Shakai Kaisou Ni Kansuru Sougou Teki Kenkyu (Comprehensive Study on Gender and Social Stratification in Contemporary Japan), edited by Fumiaki Ojima. Kyoto: Doshisha University. (In Japanese.)
15. Morioka, Kiyoshi, Keiko Nakao and Kazushi Tamano. 1997. Toshido to personal network: kenkyu mokuteki, keika, kekka no gaiyou (Urbanity and Personal Networks: Research Objectives, Procedures and Summary Findings). Sougou Toshi Kenkyuu (Comprehensive Urban Studies) 64: 5–15. (In Japanese.)
16. Nakao, Keiko. 2002. “Yusou chousa to mensetsu chousa no hikaku: personal network ni kansuru shitsumon koumoku ni kanshite (Comparison of Mail and Interview Method: Items on Personal Networks).” pp. 197–223. In: Personal Network No Kouzou to Hen’you (Structure and Changes in Personal Networks), edited by Kiyoshi Morioka. Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan University Press. (In Japanese.)
17. Nederhof, Anton J. 1985. Methods of Coping with Social Desirability Bias: a Review. European Journal of Social Psychology 15–3: 263–280.
18. Nihon marketing research kyoukai (Japan Marketing Research Association). 2005. Multi-Modes Chousa No Yukousei Kenshou Houkokusho (Report on Effectiveness of Multi-modes Survey). Tokyo: Nihon marketing research kyoukai. (In Japanese.)
19. Paulhus, Delroy L. 1991. “Measurement and Control of Response Bias.” pp. 17–59. In: Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, edited by John P Robinson, Phillip R Shaver and Lawrence S Wrightsman. San Diego: Academic Press.
20. Phillips, Derek L and Kevin J Clancy. 1972. Some Effects of ‘Social Desirability’ in Survey Studies. American Journal of Sociology 77: 921–940.
21. Schuman, Howard and Jean M Converse. 1971. The Effects of Black and White Interviewers on Black Responses in 1968. Public Opinion Quarterly 35: 44–68.
22. Silver, Brian D, Barbara A Anderson and Paul R Abramson. 1986. Who Overreports Voting? American Political Science Review 80: 613–624.
23. Suzuki, Tatsuzo. 2004. Chousa jisshi jou no ikutsuka no mondai to chousa sekkei no chigai ni yoru chousa kekka no sai (sono 1) (Several Problems in Administraion of Suvey and the Difference of Outcomes by Survey Designs, Part 1). Shin Jouhou 90: 27–31. (In Japanese.)
24. Tamano, Kazushi ed. 2001. Toshi community no shakaiteki keisei katei ni kansuru jisshouteki kenkyu (Study on the Social Composition of the Urban Local Community). Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan University. (In Japanese.)
25. Tamano, Kazushi. 2006. Toshi no kouzou tenkan to community no hen’you ni kansuru jisshou teki kenkyu (Study on the Structural Change of Urban Cities and Transformation of Local Community). Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan University. (In Japanese.)
26. Tanabe, Shunsuke. 2003. Mensetsu chousa no keppyou riyu no kentou: mensetsu chousa no kaishuu ritsu koujou no tameno ichiteigen (Analysis of Non-responses in Face-to-face Surveys: Recommendations for Improving Response Rates). Shakaigaku Ronkou (Sociological Reflections) 24: 1–27. (In Japanese.)
27. Williams, J Allen. 1964. Interviewer–Respondent Interaction: a Study of Bias in the Information Interview. Sociometry 27: 338–352.
28. Woltman, Henry F, Anthony G Turner and John M Bushery. 1980. A Comparison of Three Mixed-Mode Interviewing Procedures in the National Crime Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association 75: 534–543.
29. Yabe, Takuya. 2001a. “Kaishu data no daihyousei ni kanshite (On Representativeness of Collected Data).” pp. 11–16. In: Toshi Community No Shakaiteki Keisei Katei Ni Kansuru Jisshouteki Kenkyu (Study on the Social Composition of the Urban Local Community), edited by Kazushi Tamano. Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan University. (In Japanese.)
30. Yabe, Takuya. 2001b. “Seiji teki kanshin to shudan sanka (Political Concerns and Participation in Groups).” pp. 117–126. In: Toshi Community No Shakaiteki Keisei Katei Ni Kansuru Jisshouteki Kenkyu (Study on the Social Composition of the Urban Local Community), edited by Kazushi Tamano. Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan University. (In Japanese.)