The cyclical process of action research: The contribution of Gilles Deleuze

Action Research

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 430-448

  Drummond, John S ^a   Themessl Huber, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

action research; an apprenticeship to signs; Deleuze; minoritorian; problems and solution; the actual and the virtual

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249145212     PISSN: 14767503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1476750307077317     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ansell Pearson, K. (2002). Philosophy and the adventure of the virtual: Bergson and the time of life. London: Routledge.
2. Bonta, M., & Protevi, J. (2004). Deleuze and geophilosophy: A guide and glossary. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
3. Chisholm, R.F., & Elden, M. (1993). Features of emerging action research. Human Relations, 46(2), 275—298.
4. Colebrook, C. (2002). Gilles Deleuze. London: Routledge.
5. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (trans. P. Patton). London: The Athlone Press.
6. Deleuze, G. (2000). Proust and signs (trans. R. Howard). London: The Athlone Press.
7. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans. B. Massumi). London: The Athlone Press.
8. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? (trans. G. Burchell & H. Tomlinson). London: Verso.
9. Dick, B. (2000). A beginner's guide to action research. Action Research Online. Retrieved 20 April 2006 from: www.uq.net.au/action_research/arp/guide.html.
10. Elden, M., & Chisholm, R.F. (1993). Emerging varieties in action research: Introduction to the special issue. Human Relations, 46(2), 121—142.
11. Grundy, S. (1988). Three modes of action research. In S. Kemmis & R. McTaggert (Eds.), The action research reader (pp. 352—361). Victoria: Deakin University Press.
12. Hart, E., & Bond, M. (1995). Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
13. Kemmis, S., & McTaggert, R. (1988). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
14. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: Selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row.
15. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. McMahon, T. (1999). Is reflective practice synonymous with action research? Educational Action Research, 7(1), 163—169.
17. McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and your action research project. London: Routledge.
18. Patton, P. (2000). Deleuze and the political. London: Routledge.
19. Rajchman, J. (2000). The Deleuze connections. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
20. Rapaport, R.N. (1970). Three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23(6), 499—513.
21. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage.
22. Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Koning, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment (Vol. 5, 23). Southampton: Health Technology Assessment.
23. Williams, J. (2003). Gilles Deleuze's difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
24. Williams, J. (2005). Understanding poststructuralism. London: Acumen.
25. Winter, R. (1998). Managers, spectators and citizens: Where does ‘theory’ come from in action research? Educational Action Research, 6(3), 361—376.
26. Winter, R. (2003). Action research, relativism and critical realism: A theoretical justification for action research. Retrieved 5 August 2006 from: http://www.did.stu.mmu.ac.uk/carn/Members_papers/Richard_Winter.html.
27. Zuber-Skerrit, O. (1995). Models for action research. In S. Pinchen & R. Passfield (Eds.), Moving on: Creative applications of action learning and action research (pp. 3—29). Brisbane: ALARPM.