Word-recognition training: Computer versus tutor

Reading and Writing Quarterly

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 395-410

  Lewandowski, Lawrence ^a   Begeny, John ^a   Rogers, Cynthia ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249134658     PISSN: 10573569     EISSN: 15210693     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10573560500455786     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Zook, D., Ogier, S., Lemos-Britton, Z., & Brooksher, R. (1999). Early intervention for reading disabilities: Teaching the alphabet principle in a connectionist framework. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 491-503.
3. Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, R. (1971). American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
4. Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
5. Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the Internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
6. Daly, E. J. & Martens, B. K. (1994). A comparison of three interventions for increasing oral reading performance: Application of the instructional hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 459-469.
7. Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 383-417). New York: Longman.
8. Farmer, M. E., Klein, R., & Bryson, S. E. (1992). Computer-assisted reading: Effects of whole-word feedback on fluency and comprehension in readers with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 50-60.
9. Fleisher, L. S., Jenkins, J. R., & Pany, D. (1979). Effects on poor readers' comprehension of training in rapid decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 30-48.
10. Jiminez, J. E., Del Rosario Ortiz, M., & Rodrigo, M. (2003). Do the effects of computer-assisted practice differ for children with reading disabilities with and without IQ achievement discrepancy? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, 34-47.
11. Jones, K. M., Torgesen, J. K., & Sexton, M. A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122-128.
12. Keppel, G. (1991). Design & analysis: A researcher's handbook. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Khalili, A. & Shashaani, L. (1994). The effectiveness of computer applications: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 48-61.
14. Levy, B. A., Abello, B., & Lysynchuk, L. (1997). Transfer from word training to reading in context: Gains in reading fluency and comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 174-188.
15. Lovett, M. W., Barron, R. W., Forbes, J. E., Cuksts, B., & Steinbach, K. A. (1994). Computer speech-based training of literacy skills in neurologically impaired children: A controlled evaluation. Brain and Language, 47, 117-154.
16. McCullough, C. S. (1995). Using computer technology to monitor student progress and remediate reading problems. School Psychology Review, 24, 426-439.
17. Montali, J. & Lewandowski, L. (1996). Bimodal reading: Benefits of a talking computer for average and less skilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 271-279.
18. Morrison, F. J. (1987). The nature of reading disability: Toward an integrative framework. In S. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 33-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Report of the National Reading Panel. NIH Publication No. 00-4769. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20. Olson, R. & Wise, B. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 107-144.
21. O'Shea, L. J., Munson, S. M., & O'Shea, D. J. (1984). Error correction in oral reading: Evaluating the effectiveness of three procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 7, 203-214.
22. P. L. 107-110, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (2002, January 8). Retrieved August 1, 2003, from http:==www.ed.gov=legislation=ESEA02=
23. Pearson, P. D., Johnson, D. D., Clymer, T., Indrisano, R., Venezky, R. L., Baumann, J., et al. (1989). Silver, Burdett, and Ginn. Needham, Mass.: Silver, Burdett, and Ginn, Inc.
24. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Rose, T. L. (1984). The effects of two prepractice procedures on oral reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17, 544-548.
26. Rose, T. L. & Beattie, J. R. (1986). Relative effects of teacher-directed and taped previewing on oral reading. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 193-199.
27. Royer, J. M. (1997). A cognitive perspective on the assessment, diagnosis, and remediation of reading skills. In G. D. Phye (Ed.), Handbook of academic learning: Construction of knowledge (pp. 199-234). San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
28. Royer, J. M. & Sinatra, G. M. (1994). A cognitive theoretical approach to reading diagnostics. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 81-113.
29. Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
30. Samuels, S. J. (1988). Decoding and automaticity: Helping poor readers become automatic at word recognition. The Reading Teacher, 41, 756-760.
31. Seidenberg, M. S. & McClelland, M. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
32. Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 53, 410-413.
33. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
34. Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Concepts in developmental theories of reading skill: Cognitive resources, automaticity, and modularity. Developmental Review, 10, 72-100.
35. Swanson, L. (1999). Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis of intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 504-532.
36. Torgesen, J. K. (1986). Using computers to help learning disabled children practice reading: A research-based perspective. Learning Disabilities Focus, 1, 72-81.
37. Wilburg, K. (1995). Integrated learning systems: What does the research say? The Computing Teacher, 22, 7-10.
38. Wise, B. (1992). Whole words and decoding for short term learning: Comparisons on a ''talking-computer'' system. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 147-167.