Triangulation and mixed methods designs: Practicing what we preach in the evaluation of an Israel experience educational program

Field Methods

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 46-65

  Kadushin, Charles ^a   Hecht, Shahar ^a   Sasson, Theodore ^a   Saxe, Leonard ^a  

^a BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Field methods; Mixed methods; Triangulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 51249132552     PISSN: 1525822X     EISSN: 15523969     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X07307426     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bond, T.G., and M. Fox. 2001. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Creswell, J.W., V.L. Plano Clark, M.L. Gutmann, and W.E. Hanson. 2003. Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research, edited by A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, 209-40. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Goldberg, H., S. Heilman, and B. Kirshenblatt-Gimblett. 2002. The Israel experience: Studies in youth travel and Jewish identity. Jerusalem, Israel: Studio Kavgraph, Andrea and Charles Bronfman Philanthropies.
4. Goldwater, C. 2002. Constructing the narrative of authenticity: Tour educators at work in the Israel experience. Master's thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.
5. Hanson, W.E., J.W. Creswell, V.L. Plano Clark, K.S. Petska, and J.D. Creswell. 2005. Mixed methods research designs in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology 52 (2): 224-35.
6. Henry, N.W., and P.F. Lazarsfeld. 1968. Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7. Ivankova, N.V., J.W. Creswell, and S.L. Stick. 2006. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods 18 (1): 3-20.
8. Johnson, R.B., and A.J. Onwegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research 33 (7): 14-26.
9. Kelner, S. 2002. Almost pilgrims: Authenticity, identity and the extra-ordinary on a Jewish tour of Israel. PhD diss., Department of Sociology, City University of New York.
10. Miller, S.I., and J.L. Gatta. 2006. The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity 40 (4): 595-610.
11. Perneger, T.V. 1998. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments? The British Medical Journal 316 (7139): 1236-38.
12. Sale, J.E.M., L.H. Lohfeld, and K. Brazil. 2002. Revisiting the quantitative-qualitative debate: Implications for mixed-methods research. Quality & Quantity 36: 43-53.
13. Saxe, L., C. Kadushin, S. Kelner, M.I. Rosen, and E. Yereslove. 2002. A mega-experiment in Jewish education: The impact of birthright israel. Waltham, MA: Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, Brandeis University.
14. Saxe, L., C. Kadushin, H. Shahar, and M.I. Rosen. 2004. birthright israel: Recent findings and long-term effects. Waltham, MA: Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, Brandeis University.
15. Saxe, L., T. Sasson, and S. Hecht. 2006. Taglit-birthright israel: Impact on Jewish identity, peoplehood, and connection to Israel. Waltham, MA: Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies, Brandeis University.
16. Sieber, S.D. 1973. The integration of fieldwork and survey methods. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1335-59.
17. Tashakkori, A., and C. Teddlie. 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.