Plover: A proactive low-overhead file replication scheme for structured P2P systems

IEEE International Conference on Communications

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 5619-5623

  Shen, Haiying ^a   Zhu, Yingwu ^b  

^a University of Arkansas   (United States)

^b SEATTLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

FILE REPLICATION;

MAINTAINABILITY;

EID: 51249120983     PISSN: 05361486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICC.2008.1053     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. S. Saroiu and et al. A Measurement Study of Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Systems. In Pro. of MMCN, 2002.
2. M. Chesire, A. Wolman, and et al. Measurement and Analysis of a Streaming-Media Workload. In Proc. of USITS, 2001.
3. A. Rowstron and P. Druschel. Storage Management and Caching in PAST, a Large-scale, Persistent Peer-to-Peer Storage Utility. In Proc. of SOSP, 2001.
4. F. Dabek, M. F. Kaashoek, D. Karger, and et al. Wide-area cooperative storage with CFS. In Proc. of SOSP, 2001.
5. K. Huang and et al. LessLog: A Logless File Replication Algorithm for Peer-to-Peer Distributed Systems. In Proc. of IPDPS, 2004.
6. T. Pitoura, N. Ntarmos, and P. Triantafillou. Replication, Load Balancing and Efficient Range Query Processing in DHTs. In Proc. of EDBT, 2006.
7. T. Stading, P. Maniatis, and M. Baker. Peer-to-peer Caching Schemes to Address Flash Crowds. In Proc. of IPTPS, 2002.
8. V. Gopalakrishnan, B. Silaghi, and et al. Adaptive Replication in Peer-to-Peer Systems. In Proc. of ICDCS, 2004.
9. M. Roussopoulos and M. Baker. CUP: Controlled Update Propagation in Peer to Peer Networks. In Proc. of the USENIX 2003 Annual Technical Conf., 2003.
10. L. Yin and G. Cao. DUP: Dynamic-tree Based Update Propagation in Peer-to-Peer Networks. In Proc. of ICDE, 2005.
11. F. Fessant, S. Handurukande, and et al. Clustering in Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Workloads. In Proc. of IPDPS, 2004.
12. Z. Xu and et al. Turning Heterogeneity into an Advantage in Overlay Routing. In Proc. of INFOCOM, 2003.
13. I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Liben-Nowell, and et al. Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-Peer Lookup Protocol for Internet Applications. TON, 1(1):17-32, 2003.
14. H. Shen, C. Xu, and G. Chen. Cycloid: A Scalable Constant-Degree P2P Overlay Network. Performance Evaluation, 63(3):195-216, 2006.
15. H. Shen and C. Xu. Locality-Aware and Churn-Resilient Load Balancing Algorithms in Structured Peer-to-Peer Networks. TPDS, 2007.
16. Z. Li, G. Xie, and Z. Li. Locality-Aware Consistency Maintenance for Heterogeneous P2P Systems. In Proc. of IPDPS, 2007.
17. X. Chen, S. Ren, H. Wang, and X. Zhang. SCOPE: scalable consistency maintenance in structured P2P systems. In Proc. of INFOCOM, 2005.
18. C. Waldspurger and W. Weihl. Lottery Scheduling: Flexible Proportional-Share Resource Management. In Proc. of OSDI, pages 1-11, 1994.
19. E. Zegura, K. Calvert, and S. Bhattacharjee. How to Model an Internetwork. In Proc. of INFOCOM, 1996.