Reconstruction of humeral length and centering of the prosthetic head in hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 709-714

  Greiner, Stefan H ^a   Kääb, Max J ^a   Kröning, Iris ^a   Scheibel, Markus ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTURE HEALING; HUMAN; HUMERUS; HUMERUS FRACTURE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; REOPERATION; SHOULDER; SHOULDER RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; TENDON; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; HUMERUS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PECTORALIS MUSCLES; SHOULDER FRACTURES; TENDONS;

EID: 51249087941     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Balg F., Boulianne M., and Boileau P. Bicipital groove orientation: considerations for the retroversion of a prosthesis in fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15 (2006) 195-198
2. Boileau P., Krishnan S.G., Tinsi L., Walch G., Coste J.S., and Mole D. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 401-412
3. Boileau P., and Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 (1997) 857-865
4. Boileau P., and Walch G. Hemiprosthetic replacement in fractures of the proximal humerus. Semin Arthroplasty 11 (2000) 54-70
5. Constant C.R., and Murley A.H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1987) 160-164
6. Demirhan M., Kilicoglu O., Altinel L., Eralp L., and Akalin Y. Prognostic factors in prosthetic replacement for acute proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma 17 (2003) 181-188
7. Frankle M.A., Greenwald D.P., Markee B.A., Ondrovic L.E., and Lee III W.E. Biomechanical effects of malposition of tuberosity fragments on the humeral prosthetic reconstruction for four-part proximal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 (2001) 321-326
8. Gerber A, Apreleva M, Warner JP. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture. A new method to obtain correct humeral length. Presented at the Biennial Shoulder and Elbow Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons October 14-17, 2004; Monterey, CA.
9. Gerber C. C. Locked anterior and posterior dislocations. Complex and revision problems in shoulder surgery (1997), Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, PA p. 99-113
10. Germann G, Harth A, Wind G, Demir E. DASH Fragebogen. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand instrument; version 2.0, Deutsche version 2.0, Juni 1999. 1-5-1997.
11. Habermeyer P., and Schweiberer L. [Fractures of the humeral head. Conservative and surgical differential therapy]. Unfallchirurg 94 (1991) 438-446
12. Hempfing A., Leunig M., Ballmer F.T., and Hertel R. Surgical landmarks to determine humeral head retrotorsion for hemiarthroplasty in fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 (2001) 460-463
13. Iannotti J.P., Gabriel J.P., Schneck S.L., Evans B.G., and Misra S. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74 (1992) 491-500
14. Itamura J., Dietrick T., Roidis N., Shean C., Chen F., and Tibone J. Analysis of the bicipital groove as a landmark for humeral head replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 322-326
15. Kralinger F., Schwaiger R., Wambacher M., et al. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86 (2004) 217-219
16. Loew M., Heitkemper S., Parsch D., Schneider S., and Rickert M. Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88 (2006) 345-350
17. Mighell M.A., Kolm G.P., Collinge C.A., and Frankle M.A. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 12 (2003) 569-577
18. Murachovsky J., Ikemoto R.Y., Nascimento L.G., Fujiki E.N., Milani C., and Warner J.J. Pectoralis major tendon reference (PMT): a new method for accurate restoration of humeral length with hemiarthroplasty for fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 15 (2006) 675-678
19. Naranja Jr. R.J., and Iannotti J.P. Displaced three- and four-part proximal humerus fractures: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8 (2000) 373-382
20. Neer C.S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52 (1970) 1077-1089
21. Neer C.S. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52 (1970) 1090-1103
22. Prakash U., McGurty D.W., and Dent J.A. Hemiarthroplasty for severe fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 11 (2002) 428-430
23. Robinson C.M., and Aderinto J. Posterior shoulder dislocations and fracture-dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 (2005) 639-650
24. Robinson C.M., Page R.S., Hill R.M., Sanders D.L., Court-Brown C.M., and Wakefield A.E. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 (2003) 1215-1223
25. Sanchez-Sotelo J., O'Driscoll S.W., Torchia M.E., Cofield R.H., and Rowland C.M. Radiographic assessment of cemented humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10 (2001) 526-531
26. Smith A.M., Mardones R.M., Sperling J.W., and Cofield R.H. Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16 (2007) 14-24
27. Trupka A., Wiedemann E., Ruchholtz S., Brunner U., Habermeyer P., and Schweiberer L. [Dislocated multiple fragment fractures of the head of the humerus. Does dislocation of the humeral head fragment signify a worse prognosis?]. Unfallchirurg 100 (1997) 105-110